Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Chaman Giri & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that appointments made pursuant to an erroneous competitive examination result, later revised by court order, are illegal and cannot be regularized, dismissing petitions of CRPF personnel seeking to retain their promoted rank.
Sunil Kumar Dahiya v. State
Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of a developer accused of large-scale economic offences, emphasizing the gravity of fraud, risk of flight, and lack of bona fide intention to implement a settlement scheme.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-3 v. Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's quashing of reassessment orders under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act due to absence of incriminating material found during search, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
Track and Towers Infratech P Ltd v. National Highway Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld NHAI's decision to disqualify a bidder for failing to meet specific tender eligibility criteria, emphasizing limited judicial interference in tender evaluations absent arbitrariness or mala fides.
Ravi Pal Singh and Ors. v. Additional Divisional Magistrate
The Delhi High Court directed the LAC Reference Court to include all legal heirs of a deceased landowner as interested parties in a pending land acquisition Reference to ensure proper adjudication of compensation claims.
Ravinder Kumar v. The State
The Delhi High Court quashed a rape FIR under Section 482 CrPC after the prosecutrix retracted her allegations and sought to discontinue the case, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process in exceptional circumstances.
Bhateri Devi & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Prince Taneja & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled through mediation and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Chaman Giri & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that appointments based on a competitive exam result subsequently set aside and revised by court orders are illegal and cannot be regularized, dismissing petitions of CRPF personnel seeking continuation as Sub-Inspectors.
Arun Chhibber and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
Retired CRPF officers entitled to retrospective Non-Functional Financial Upgradation at HAG level from 2006, as deputation posts qualify as service posts under DoPT OMs.
Sherin Dua & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Laxman v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 10 of the POCSO Act based on the credible and competent testimony of a child victim, dismissing the appeal despite absence of corroborative forensic evidence or judicial TIP.
Rajiv Saxena v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the award of a Ph.D. degree, holding that the petitioner lacked locus standi as he was not an aggrieved person and the University lawfully appointed alternate Supervisors to conduct the viva-voce.
M/S KALRA PAPERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside the ITAT's ex-parte order and restore the appeal upon finding sufficient cause for non-appearance, emphasizing that merits of the order cannot be examined at the stage of recalling an ex-parte order under Rule 25 ITAT Rules.
Rohit v. Central Bureau of Narcotics
The Delhi High Court held that only an authorized officer who prepared the seizure inventory under the NDPS Act can file an application for disposal of seized narcotics, setting aside disposal orders filed by an unauthorized officer.
Anil Dutt Sharma v. Shri Amulya Patnayak & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for contempt, holding that the respondents complied with the order to communicate final findings and no fresh inquiry or detailed reply to each allegation was mandated.
Vijay Israni v. Salim Lalvani
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to plaintiff's failure to demonstrate readiness and willingness and rejected refund and compensation claims under a forfeiture clause in the agreement.
Manoj v. The State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act due to material inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of corroborative medical evidence, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mehta Charitable Prajanalaya Trust
The Delhi High Court dismissed income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner against Mehta Charitable Prajanalaya Trust due to the tax effect being below the prescribed threshold limit under Circular No. 17/2019.
Siti Networks Limited v. New Likitha Cable and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal to urgently list and hear petitions concerning alleged unauthorized subscriber migration under Interconnection Agreements, without expressing any opinion on the merits.