Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears to former personnel within 12 weeks or provide reasons for denial, affirming entitlement based on prior precedents.
Om Prakash Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed petitions challenging AFT orders denying pro rata pension, holding the AFT bound by High Court precedents and directing payment of pension with arrears and interest.
Indo Swiss Chemicals Ltd and Another v. Willowood Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging interlocutory orders granting interim relief under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, holding that pending applications under Rule 4 CPC must be heard first and procedural objections cannot be raised at the appellate stage.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension and arrears with interest to ex-servicemen holding No Objection Certificates, in line with established precedents.
Indo Swiss Chemicals Ltd and Another v. Willowood Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals against interlocutory orders in commercial suits, refusing to interfere pending substantive applications under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension and arrears with interest to ex-servicemen petitioners holding No Objection Certificates, following established precedents.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to ex-servicemen petitioners holding No Objection Certificates, following precedents affirming such entitlement.
ICICI Bank v. Lalit Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed ICICI Bank's petition permitting sale of a repossessed vehicle by public auction under Order XXXIX Rule 6 CPC, emphasizing timely adjudication and procedural safeguards.
Vikas Chowdhary v. Principal Director of Income Tax (Investigation)-I, New Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the income tax investigation, holding that the investigation was lawful and no interference was warranted.
Vinay Kumar v. Sudhir Kumar @S Balyan
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s applications to admit documents and amend pleadings, set aside the Trial Court’s partial rejection, and directed expeditious disposal of the respondent’s interim injunction application.
Vinay Kumar v. Sudhir Kumar @S Balyan
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s applications to place documents on record and amend the written statement, setting aside the Trial Court’s partial rejection and directing expeditious hearing of the respondent’s interim injunction application.
ICICI Bank v. Archana Raj & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed ICICI Bank's petition permitting sale of a repossessed vehicle through public auction after due notice, clarifying the procedure under Order XXXIX Rule 6 CPC to prevent loss due to delay.
Saurabh Jain v. Shilpa Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that for maintenance proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the Family Court has jurisdiction where the wife resides temporarily or permanently, and thus upheld the Family Court, Rohini's jurisdiction despite the wife's temporary stay outside the district.
Shri Raghav Mann & Ors. v. The Office of District & Sessions Judge Headquarters
The Delhi High Court upheld the employer's discretion to adopt the 'unrestricted' method for evaluating typing tests in recruitment, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the evaluation criteria and result.
ICICI Bank v. Subodh Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed ICICI Bank's petition permitting sale of a repossessed vehicle through public auction under Order XXXIX Rule 6 CPC, emphasizing timely adjudication and procedural safeguards to protect the bank's interests.
ABC v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to consider the petitioner’s reward claim under the applicable policy expeditiously and in accordance with law, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Pankaj Mehta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions on safe disposal of COVID-19 test swabs, holding that existing detailed guidelines must be followed and allowing the petitioner to approach the Court if non-compliance occurs.
Pramod Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of a BSF employee seeking relief against his transfer and protection as a whistleblower after his complaint was found false and disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him.
Sasanka Sahoo v. Director General, Border Security Force & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal of a BSF constable for prolonged unauthorized absence and upheld the disciplinary action without trial by Security Force Court.
ICICI Bank v. Mohd. Adil
The Delhi High Court allowed ICICI Bank's petition permitting sale of a repossessed vehicle by public auction with prior court permission and notice to the debtor, emphasizing timely adjudication to prevent loss to the secured creditor.