Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Syed Sadique Raza v. Jamia Millia Islamia & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a student barred from 5th semester exams due to low attendance, holding that attendance and passing prior semester exams are mandatory for promotion and result declaration.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to ex-servicemen petitioners holding No Objection Certificates, following established precedents.
Dominant Systems Private Limited v. Surjeet Singh
The Delhi High Court held that assisting a relative in a family business does not necessarily constitute gainful employment under Section 17B of the ID Act and directed payment of 50% wages pending appeal due to insufficient evidence of adequate income.
Secretary Delhi General Workers Union v. Vijay Kumar Uppal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against Union Bank for alleged non-compliance of reinstatement orders, holding the Bank had complied by allowing the workmen to report and attaching them as drivers, and disposed the petition in light of a detailed judgment on regularization.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to discharged personnel holding NOCs, following established precedents.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears to ex-servicemen petitioners within 12 weeks, consistent with prior precedents, or provide written reasons for denial.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to ex-servicemen petitioners in line with established precedents, allowing their petitions conditionally.
Om Prakash Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions challenging AFT orders denying pro rata pension, holding the AFT bound by High Court precedents and directing payment with arrears and interest.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to ex-servicemen petitioners in line with established precedents or provide written reasons for denial within 12 weeks.
Om Prakash Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's denial of pro rata pension, holding that the Tribunal must follow binding precedents and directing payment of pension with arrears and interest.
H.C. Ram Naresh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the diagnosis of Alcohol Dependence Syndrome by the Medical Board and dismissed the petitioner’s writ seeking a third medical opinion and quashing of invalidation from ITBP service.
Union of India v. Vodafone Group PLC & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that issues of jurisdiction and abuse of process in parallel BIPA arbitrations are to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal, dismissing UOI's suit as infructuous and binding Vodafone to proceed with India-UK BIPA arbitration only if the India-Netherlands BIPA award is set aside.
Fahim v. The State (Govt of GNCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC but reduced his sentence considering mitigating factors and unreliable public witness testimony.
Indian Naturopathy and Yoga Graduates Medical Association v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a writ petition challenging the appointment of an Adviser in the Ministry of AYUSH after the appointment ceased by official order.
Kanodia Oil Mills v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of the petitioner's GST refund claim and granted liberty to initiate further proceedings if the refund is not granted.
K. M. Yadav v. Director of Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging dismissal after superannuation, holding that the petitioner must approach the statutory Tribunal under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, as the writ was not maintainable in presence of an efficacious alternative remedy.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to discharged personnel holding No Objection Certificates, following established precedents.
Om Prakash Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions challenging AFT orders, directing payment of pro rata pension with arrears and interest to discharged Indian Air Force personnel, affirming the High Court's jurisdiction and binding nature of its precedents on the AFT.
Deepak Singh Jatav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of a candidate's recruitment in the Railway Protection Force for non-disclosure of a criminal case despite acquittal on compromise, emphasizing strict adherence to disclosure norms in disciplined force recruitment.
Indo Swiss Chemicals Ltd and Another v. Willowood Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals against interlocutory orders under Order XXXIX CPC, emphasizing procedural fairness and directing expeditious hearing of pending applications.