Delhi High Court

99,566 judgments

Year:

Snehil Deota v. University of Delhi and Anr

18 Dec 2020 · Jayant Nath · 2020:DHC:3634

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the University of Delhi's exclusion of certain sports certificates and upheld the final Sports Merit List prepared in accordance with prescribed guidelines and deadlines.

administrative petition_dismissed Sports Quota Admission University of Delhi Writ Petition Admission Guidelines

Vijay Mann @ Kapil v. State (NCT of Delhi)

18 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3627
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that sanction for prosecution under MCOCA can be granted based on multiple charge sheets pending against the organized crime syndicate as a whole, not necessarily against the individual accused, and dismissed the petition challenging the sanction.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 sanction for prosecution organized crime syndicate continuing unlawful activity

Mother Teresa College for Girls v. National Council for Teacher Education

18 Dec 2020 · D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:3635-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal confirming that unexplained delay in replying to a Show Cause Notice and filing appeals under the NCTE Act justifies rejection of recognition applications and dismissal of writ petitions on grounds of delay and laches.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant NCTE Act, 1993 Show Cause Notice delay and laches appeal under Section 18 NCTE Act

Monica Sehgal v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1

18 Dec 2020 · Manmohan; Sanjeev Narula · 2020:DHC:3911-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of income tax appeals as not pressed since the appellant filed applications under the Vivad se Vishwas Amnesty Scheme, 2020, granting liberty to revive if unresolved.

tax appeal_dismissed Vivad se Vishwas Amnesty Scheme, 2020 income tax appeal amicable resolution appeal disposal

Krishan Lal Garg v. Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority & Anr.

18 Dec 2020 · Navin Chawla · 2020:DHC:3631

The Delhi High Court held that a procedural requirement mandating probate of Will under amended IEPF Rules applies prospectively and cannot be imposed retrospectively on pending claims for transmission of shares.

civil petition_allowed Significant Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority Rules probate of Will retrospective application procedural requirement

Mandeep Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3633-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking withdrawal of resignation by a BSF officer, holding that such withdrawal is discretionary and the petitioner failed to satisfy the conditions under applicable rules and policy.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant withdrawal of resignation Central Civil Services Pension Rules DoPT Office Memorandum 2019 Border Security Force

Amit Khaneja and Ors. v. IL & FS Financial Services Ltd.

18 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3626

The Delhi High Court held that RBI COVID-19 moratorium circulars do not apply to pre-pandemic defaults and dismissed the writ petition challenging revocation of a One Time Settlement under SARFAESI Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant One Time Settlement SARFAESI Act Non-Performing Asset RBI COVID-19 circulars

Bal Bhagwan v. Delhi Development Authority

18 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3628
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a person claiming settled possession without title over government land cannot prevent lawful dispossession by injunction once due process is followed, dismissing the petitioner’s writ under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Significant settled possession interim injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India

Ganpat Rai v. Rajiv Garg

18 Dec 2020 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2020:DHC:3632

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte eviction order due to non-service of summons, holding that the burden to prove service lies on the respondent and ex parte orders without valid service can be set aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order IX Rule 13 CPC service of summons ex parte eviction Delhi Rent Control Act

Manoj Anand & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

17 Dec 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:3616

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC complainant's consent

SRF Limited v. Commissioner of VAT & Anr.

17 Dec 2020 · Manmohan; Sanjeev Narula · 2020:DHC:3614-DB

The Delhi High Court directed amendment of VAT returns and issuance of Form 'F' but suspended relief pending Supreme Court decisions on similar issues.

tax petition_dismissed Procedural Form F VAT return amendment CST (Delhi) Rules 2005 time limit for revised returns

Brig. Ravi Navet v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3613-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Army posting orders, holding that organizational requirements prevail over officers' posting preferences absent mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed posting orders Indian Army Brigadier Posting Planning Self Analysis

Charu Jain v. Directorate of Education, GNCT of Delhi and Anr.

17 Dec 2020 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2020:DHC:3620

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination but directed interim payment of salary to the petitioner pending adjudication before the statutory Tribunal.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant termination order interim salary payment Delhi School Education Tribunal writ petition

DESIGNCO v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

17 Dec 2020 · Chief Justice D. N. Patel; Justice Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:3622-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious adjudication of a pending Show Cause Notice and left other refund and order-challenging issues open for appropriate proceedings.

administrative other Show Cause Notice Adjudication Customs Notification Refund claim

Jyoti Thakur v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3623-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a CISF recruit on grounds of medical unfitness after a valid fresh medical examination, dismissing the petition challenging the termination during probation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical fitness probation termination CISF recruitment Article 14

DR KHEDKAR PUJA DEELIPRAO v. UNION SERVICE PUBLIC COMMISSION

17 Dec 2020 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2020:DHC:3625-DB

The Delhi High Court directed UPSC to dispose of the petitioner’s representation concerning examination grievances by a speaking order within two weeks, ensuring procedural fairness under Articles 14 and 21.

administrative petition_allowed Union Public Service Commission Article 14 Article 21 Fundamental Rights

Vateena Begum v. Shamim Zafar & Anr.

17 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3612

The Delhi High Court held that objections in execution proceedings involving disputed title and possession must be adjudicated after framing issues and trial, especially where a Will is involved, and set aside the summary rejection of objections based on unregistered documents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Order XXI Rule 101 CPC execution proceedings unregistered documents

Ashok Singh Bhadauria and Ors. v. The Union of India and Ors.

17 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3624-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that unchallenged seniority lists attaining finality cannot be altered retrospectively based on a judgment in personam, restoring petitioners' promotions and setting aside their reversion.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Protection Force Seniority list Promotion Reversion

Indian Railways Medical Laboratory Technologists Association v. Ministry of Railways and Anr.

17 Dec 2020 · Jyoti Singh · 2020:DHC:3618

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking 7th CPC benefits to Central Government employees for lack of jurisdiction, directing the petitioners to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.

administrative appeal_dismissed 7th Central Pay Commission service matter jurisdiction Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Ajai Kumar Srivastava v. University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi) and Ors.

17 Dec 2020 · Jyoti Singh · 2020:DHC:3619

The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to decide the petitioner’s representation for upgradation of his post within a stipulated time, without adjudicating on the substantive claim.

administrative other regularization absorption lecturer radiological physics