Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Summy Bhasin v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that disputed factual defenses must be adjudicated at trial and not at the summoning stage under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Sunita Aggarwal v. Yogesh Garg & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the order directing temporary de-sealing of a property for repairs and subsequent re-sealing, affirming municipal authority powers and court's contempt jurisdiction to enforce compliance.
ICICI BANK v. KANTA MALHOTRA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the execution order, holding that the petitioner’s withdrawal of the challenge without leave confirmed the trial court’s order directing payment of interest on a fixed deposit.
Paramjeet Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce decree between the parties.
Modern College v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the NCTE Appellate Committee’s rejection of the petitioner’s delayed appeal for recognition of two D.El.Ed. units, holding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for condonation of delay.
Sumit Bhasin v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of a complaint under Section 138 NI Act against a director, holding that liability extends to persons in charge and disputed defenses must be adjudicated at trial.
PBE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and dissolution of PBE India Private Limited after finding full compliance with statutory requirements and absence of outstanding liabilities.
2103f3e6bae230b088608dd1850cb71ee180d13ac064ddf8e77ca679c13be428
The Supreme Court restored criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 406, and 34 IPC in a commercial dispute, holding that the High Court erred in quashing them under Section 482 CrPC where prima facie cognizable offenses were disclosed.
Nature Essence Private Limited v. Protogreen Retail Solutions Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interlocutory injunction to the plaintiff restraining defendants from using the deceptively similar trademark "Nature's Tattva", holding that the plaintiff established a prima facie case of infringement and the defendants' prior use claim was not credible.
M/s Gwalior Transmissions Systems Ltd. v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Authority's review petition seeking recall of a consent order fixing scaled down dues and interest payable by an auction purchaser in a liquidation sale, affirming the binding nature of consent orders and auction terms over original lease contract terms.
Saddam Husain v. Ram Prasad and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a motor accident claim petition withdrawn due to mistaken legal advice on jurisdiction, affirming that claims can be filed where the insurance company carries on business.
Delhi Development Authority v. Varindera Construction Limited
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing and re-filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that re-filing after curing defects does not restart limitation and sufficient cause was shown to entertain the petition.
Kent Ro Systems Ltd. & Anr. v. Jaideep Kishnani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed defendants' application to file additional documents after written statement in a design infringement suit for failure to show reasonable cause for prior non-disclosure under Order 11 Rule 1(10) CPC.
Ashish Bansal & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Ganesh Prasad Ram v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings against a CISF member, holding no violation of natural justice and upholding the enhanced punishment as not disproportionate.
Vaibhav Gupta v. Real Estate Regulatory Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by a proposed buyer challenging a real estate project's legality, holding that only aggrieved parties have locus and unauthorized construction issues must be addressed by designated authorities.
Pitabasa Panigrahi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to petitioners similarly placed as in prior judgments, with interest on delayed arrears and procedural safeguards.
Linkquest Quippo Infra Limited v. A2Z Infra Engineering Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a presiding arbitrator to complete the arbitral tribunal and granted interim reliefs restraining payments outside the escrow account pending arbitration of disputes arising from a subcontract termination.
Meena v. Delhi Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court directed the parties to resolve their contractual disputes through arbitration under the DIAC as per the arbitration clause in their license agreement.
Rajendra Prasad Sharma v. Union Public Service Commission; Union Public Service Commission v. Akul Bhargava
The Delhi High Court upheld its jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition challenging UPSC's cancellation of IAS induction interviews despite alternative remedy before the CAT, emphasizing natural justice and extraordinary circumstances.