Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Neelam v. Yashpal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging enhanced maintenance, directing retrospective payment from petition dates in line with Supreme Court precedent.
ASI/GD Shyam Oraon v. Union of India and Ors.; ASI GD Shekhar Chandra Pandey v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and grant the petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with binding Supreme Court and Division Bench judgments within twelve weeks.
db0f4338c829baeffa16e8de04b3bc4993f3f985abc4dabc1190952c602d55ac
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications in a murder conspiracy case, emphasizing cautious exercise of discretion in heinous offences based on prima facie evidence and the nature of the crime.
Raghvender Singh@ Rinku v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Bail applications of the accused in a double murder case were dismissed due to prima facie evidence including recovery of stolen property and conspiracy established through phone records.
3c6d8144a573f653b38eaa58d80151a6cca51e21714b911350350362d3ae2aa5
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications in a murder conspiracy case, emphasizing cautious judicial discretion and the strength of prima facie evidence in denying bail for heinous offenses.
Raghvender Singh@ Rinku v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of the accused in a double murder case, holding that prima facie evidence including recovery of deceased's property and communication with prime accused justified denial of bail.
Gautam Philip & Vivek Berry Barrister at Law LLP v. M/S Sun Chemical Group Cooperatief UA
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil commercial suit in terms of the parties' settlement agreement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, disposing of the suit and pending applications with partial refund of court fees.
Dharampal v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for financial upgradations under the ACP and MACP schemes in accordance with binding Supreme Court and High Court precedents within twelve weeks, subject to any future Supreme Court orders.
Sumit Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging rejection of OBC status in a 2015 examination due to delay and laches, emphasizing that rights must be enforced promptly to avoid prejudice to others.
Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh v. Bar Council of India
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection to the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh against unauthorized interference by the Bar Council of India pending mediation to resolve their administrative dispute.
Satish Seth v. Indu Kapoor
The Delhi High Court held that an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act is not maintainable against an order rejecting a suit on limitation grounds when the suit is pending before an ordinary court and not a Commercial Court.
Om Prakash Gupta v. Anjani Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the respondent wife's statutory right to reside in her husband's co-owned matrimonial home under the DV Act, dismissing the petition challenging the residence order despite strained family relations and separate living arrangements.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3 v. M/S Sheraton International LLC
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals by relying on an earlier Division Bench judgment covering the same legal questions in an income tax dispute involving Sheraton International LLC.
Rahul Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compensatory attempts in UPSC Civil Services Examinations due to last-minute syllabus changes, holding that candidates are estopped from challenging the examination process after participation and delay.
Sonam Asrani @ Ramila & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restrained government officials from unlawfully interfering with petitioners' possession of property and ordered an inquiry into alleged coercion during ongoing family property disputes.
Delhi Jal Board v. Nirmala Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Delhi Jal Board's delayed writ petition challenging the CAT order directing reconsideration of compassionate appointment based on proper educational qualifications.
Dr. Angela Ann Joseph v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Rehabilitation Council of India and Ministry of Health to decide on the recognition of the petitioner’s PhD in Clinical Psychology from AIIMS within 30 days, emphasizing statutory obligations under the Rehabilitation Council of India Act.
Azmira Bhima v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the power to relax service rules for promotion applies only to classes or categories of persons for valid reasons and denied individual relaxation to the petitioner lacking eligibility and justification.
Manish Kumar Nathubhai v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the BSF's termination of a constable for self-inflicted injury and sleeping on duty, upholding the disciplinary authority's decision based on SSFC findings.
Chandra Bhawan Pandey and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and grant financial upgradations under the ACP and MACP schemes to petitioners in accordance with binding Supreme Court and High Court judgments, pending final adjudication by the Supreme Court.