Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
CINEPOLIS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. SARITA MULTIPLEXES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the parties' commercial disputes and permitted the petitioner to file an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the arbitrator, directing interim orders to continue pending arbitration.
BISWAJIT ROY v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging only show cause notices issued by Sashastra Seema Bal are premature and directed that termination orders, if passed, be stayed for two weeks to enable statutory appeals under Rule 29 of the SSB Rules, 2009.
Business Standard Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Lohitaksha Shukla & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a defamation complaint and summoning order for lack of locus of the complainant as a 'person aggrieved' under Section 199 CrPC and absence of prima facie offence under Sections 499 and 500 IPC.
Hero Motocorp Limited v. M S Deep Automobiles & Anr.
The Delhi High Court referred a contractual dispute under a dealership agreement to arbitration and directed appointment of an arbitrator due to the respondents' failure to respond or participate.
Manish Kumar v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
The Delhi High Court set aside the NCDRC's order condoning delay beyond the statutory period for filing a written version under the Consumer Protection Act, holding such delay condonation without reasons and jurisdiction is illegal.
Parveen Kumar v. M/S Poonam Securities Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an order appointing a receiver under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act after the parties amicably settled their loan dispute and the vehicle was returned.
Jagat Ram & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and grant the petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with binding Supreme Court and Division Bench judgments, subject to any future Supreme Court orders.
Saleem v. State of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed revision petitions challenging the discharge of two accused due to vague allegations, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction in interference with discharge orders.
Saleem v. State of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of two accused from dowry harassment and murder charges due to vague allegations and lack of supporting evidence, emphasizing the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction at the charge framing stage.
Vinod Kumar and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the method of fixing inter se seniority of ITBP Assistant Commandants promoted through LDCE by combining marks of the LDCE and Basic Professional Course, dismissing the petition challenging the seniority list.
EX HC GD HANUMAN PRASAD v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and decide the petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with Supreme Court and Division Bench precedents within twelve weeks.
CINEPOLIS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. SARITA MULTIPLEXES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between Cinepolis India Pvt. Ltd. and Sarita Multiplexes Pvt. Ltd., permitting a Section 17 application before the arbitrator and continuing interim orders.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 v. M/S Cinestaan Entertainment Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order rejecting the Revenue's addition under Section 56(2)(viib), holding that valuation by a prescribed expert using the DCF method cannot be disregarded merely because actual results differ from projections.
Ajay Kumar Saroj & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Ram Krishna & Ors v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial discord under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a voluntary settlement and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Daryav Singh & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed petitioners to file representation against their seniority fixation order and stayed its operation pending reasoned disposal, holding that a prior judgment not quashing the standing order is not binding on non-parties.
Ram Mehar v. Ali Mohd. & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the second appeal holding that secondary evidence without proof of destruction is inadmissible and a caretaker cannot transfer leasehold rights, thus the appellant failed to establish possession.
CPL Roni Sen v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in precedent cases, with arrears payable with interest, preserving respondents’ right to appeal.
Satayender Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking seniority fixation due to inordinate delay, laches, and non-joinder of necessary parties, emphasizing that delay defeats equity in administrative service matters.
Manashwy Jha v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Bar Association to consult stakeholders on hybrid hearings and vaccination of lawyers amid COVID-19, while suspending adverse orders against lawyers unable to appear physically for justifiable reasons.