Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
Perot Systems India Foundation v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's petition to dissolve Perot Systems India Foundation after confirming full compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.
Bobby Collin v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a foreign national accused of trafficking commercial quantity of cocaine under the NDPS Act, holding that procedural lapses alleged can be examined during trial and bail is not warranted at the fag end of trial.
Kusum Lata v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking direction to register FIR, holding that the Magistrate rightly exercised discretion under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. as the complainant had full knowledge of facts and evidence, and the dispute was essentially matrimonial.
Salman @ Takli v. The State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainants' consent to discontinue prosecution.
Arun Attri v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical unfitness for Airmen recruitment, holding that Armed Forces doctors' medical opinions prevail over civilian opinions and no further review examination was warranted.
Sunil Sud & Anr. v. Ajay Sud
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate partnership disputes involving alleged exclusion, mismanagement, and diversion of business assets, holding such disputes to be arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to implement a comprehensive National Policy for Rare Diseases, including funding mechanisms and specialized committees, ensuring treatment and research support for patients with rare diseases.
Avon Healthcare Private Limited v. Trade International & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act cannot be granted against a non-party to the arbitration when execution of the award is stayed and disputed factual issues require separate adjudication.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to implement the National Policy for Rare Diseases, establish dedicated committees and funds for treatment and research, and address funding and disability-related concerns for rare disease patients.
The Delhi Golf Club Employees Union v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Delhi Golf Club is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 as an authority performing public functions and quashed illegal termination of permanent employees during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subhash Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with binding Supreme Court and Division Bench precedents within twelve weeks, subject to any future Supreme Court orders.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to implement a comprehensive National Policy for Rare Diseases, establish specialized committees and funds, and ensure timely treatment and funding for patients suffering from rare diseases.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed compliance with its detailed orders for finalizing a National Policy on Rare Diseases, constitution of expert committees, and proper management of funds to ensure timely treatment and funding for patients suffering from rare diseases.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India and AIIMS to implement and report on the National Policy for Rare Diseases, ensuring treatment funding and institutional mechanisms for rare disease patients.
Bishan Swaroop v. Mahender Kumar Pandey
The Delhi High Court upheld the rights of female heirs to perform puja sewa and receive offerings in the Kalkaji Mandir bari, appointed court receivers to secure these rights and ensure transparent accounting during the Navratri period.
Kavita Malik v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the six-month cooling-off period for mutual consent divorce is directory and directed the Family Court to pass the first motion order retrospectively, remedying procedural delay and enabling expeditious divorce.
Taruna Saxena v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that advocates have the right to represent parties before Maintenance Tribunals under the Act, and that Tribunals have discretion to regulate summary procedures including evidence.
Mujeebuddin and Another v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 306 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's non-objection, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice.
Anant Raj Projects Ltd. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant a brief extension to deposit the second instalment as per the Single Judge's order, without expressing any opinion on the case merits.
Yuva Vyavsaik Shikspian Mahavidyalaya v. Dr. Anand Mishra & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh, as parties were attempting an amicable resolution.