Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
X v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the enforceability of court orders for removal of unlawful online content, clarifying intermediary liabilities under the IT Act and the 2021 Rules to ensure effective redressal against unauthorized posting of private images.
M/S SQUIRREL DESIGN HOUSE v. NATIONAL FERTILIZERS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging termination of a commercial contract with a public sector undertaking, holding that contractual disputes with arbitration clauses are not amenable to writ jurisdiction.
Savita Jain Sole Proprietor of M S Navkar Sales v. M/S Krishna Packaging
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, directing the respondent to furnish security for the admitted liability to prevent rendering arbitration proceedings infructuous.
Savita Jain v. MS Krishna Sales
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed the respondent to furnish a bank guarantee for the admitted amount under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, holding that interim relief is warranted where liability is prima facie admitted to prevent rendering arbitration proceedings infructuous.
Trosifol India Private Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court ordered the dissolution of Trosifol India Private Limited in members voluntary liquidation after finding full compliance with the Companies Act, 1956 and no prejudice to members or public interest.
Abhishek Kumar v. Office of District and Sessions Judge (HQ) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the authority's decision to dispense with the descriptive test and reduce interview marks in judicial recruitment, holding that the change was lawful, non-arbitrary, and within the advertised and statutory framework.
Rajesh Kumar v. Anurag Jain
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to supply deficiency notices to petitioners and deliver possession within three weeks after curing defects, disposing of the petitions accordingly.
KBM FOODS PVT. LTD. v. SACHIN GUPTA
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favor of KBM Foods Pvt. Ltd. restraining the defendant from using the deceptively similar 'GAI CHAAP' mark with 'COW' device, affirming prior user rights and passing off principles despite defendant's trademark registration.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to implement a comprehensive National Policy for Rare Diseases, establish dedicated funding and committees for treatment, and ensure timely and transparent healthcare support for rare disease patients.
Ashok Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension with arrears and interest to a petitioner similarly placed to earlier pension beneficiaries, preserving rights of appeal.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to implement a comprehensive National Policy for Rare Diseases with institutional mechanisms and dedicated funding to ensure treatment and research for rare disease patients.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to implement a comprehensive National Policy for Rare Diseases, establish dedicated funds and committees for treatment and research, and ensure statutory compliance for financial support to patients suffering from rare diseases.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India and AIIMS to implement and report on the National Policy for Rare Diseases, ensuring adequate treatment, funding, and research mechanisms for patients suffering from rare diseases.
Sunil Sud & Anr. v. Ajay Sud
The Delhi High Court referred partnership disputes involving allegations of mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duties to arbitration, appointing an independent arbitrator to adjudicate all issues.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to implement a comprehensive National Policy for Rare Diseases with dedicated institutional and funding mechanisms to ensure treatment and research support for patients.
Jai Bhagwan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and dispose of petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with binding Supreme Court and Division Bench precedents within twelve weeks.
Uma Pati Sood v. Rakesh Katyal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the doctrine of lis pendens does not bind an alienee who is not a party or successor-in-interest to pending litigation, dismissing the appellant's challenge to a partition decree.
Utkarsh Indrajit Pawar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to implement a comprehensive National Policy for Rare Diseases with institutional mechanisms and dedicated funding to ensure timely treatment and research for rare disease patients.
The Delhi Golf Club Employees Union v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Delhi Golf Club is a private body not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 for termination of employees during COVID-19, dismissing petitions on maintainability and statutory grounds.
DUFRY INDIA WHOLESALE TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and dissolution of DUFRY INDIA WHOLESALE TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED after finding full compliance with the Companies Act, 1956 and no prejudice to members or public interest.