Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
Niranjan Lal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension to petitioners similarly placed as in prior judgments, with arrears payable with interest, preserving rights of verification and appeal.
SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANTS PVT. LTD. v. D S FOODS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order referring a trademark dispute to arbitration, holding that parties cannot take inconsistent stands on arbitrability and that the dispute is non-arbitrable as both parties agreed.
Shri Baba Mastnath Ayurvedic College v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of an Ayurvedic college seeking increased admission capacity for 2020-21, holding that lack of continuous permission and Supreme Court precedent precluded relief beyond the prescribed intake and cut-off date.
WHATSAPP LLC ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Harish Salve and Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocates with Mr.Tejas Karia, Mr.Shashank Mishra, Ms.Nitika Dwivedi, Mr.Aasish Somasi, Advs v. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Competition Commission of India's jurisdiction to investigate WhatsApp's 2021 data sharing update under the Competition Act despite pending privacy litigation, dismissing challenges to the investigation order.
Sheikh M. Maroof v. Phoenix ARC Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition upholding the DRAT's order forfeiting the petitioner's deposit and dismissing his appeals for failure to comply with conditional interim relief and dishonest conduct in a SARFEASI Act possession dispute.
Pankaj Nayak v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 336 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties involving minor injury, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Concentrix Services Netherlands B.V. v. Income Tax Officer (TDS) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the MFN clause in the protocol to the India-Netherlands DTAA entitles Dutch resident companies to a 5% withholding tax rate on dividends, overruling the 10% rate fixed by tax authorities.
WHATSAPP LLC ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Harish Salve and Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocates with Mr.Tejas Karia, Mr.Shashank Mishra, Ms.Nitika Dwivedi, Mr.Aasish Somasi, Advs v. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Competition Commission of India's suo moto order directing investigation into WhatsApp's 2021 privacy policy update for alleged abuse of dominance, dismissing challenges based on pending judicial proceedings.
HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA LTD. & ANR. v. DR. T.N. GROVER
The Delhi High Court upheld the decree directing Hyundai Motor India Ltd. to deliver the third prize gold coin to the contest winner, holding that a suit for mandatory injunction is maintainable without declaratory relief when the plaintiff's title is clear and the defendant fails to prove a corrigendum letter disputing that title.
M/S INSTAPOWER LTD. v. AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that blacklisting based on forgery allegations not raised in the show cause notice violates natural justice and directed a fresh opportunity for the petitioner to respond.
Bata India Limited v. Sarla Sharma & Ors.
Appeal under Section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act is not maintainable against dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC in eviction petitions governed by Section 25B; remedy lies only by revision under Section 25B(8).
Niranjan Lal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension to petitioners similarly placed as in earlier judgments, with arrears and interest payable if delayed.
JKUMAR - CRTV JV, Mumbai v. Regional Labour Commissioner, New Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order condoning delay in minimum wages claims without sufficient reasons and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with proper opportunity to the parties.
Niranjan Lal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension with arrears and interest to petitioners similarly placed as in prior binding judgments, preserving rights of appeal.
David Collin @ Madhuabuchi Okoro v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that statutory presumptions and evidence warranted denial of bail at the trial stage.
Pothens Vehicles and Service Pvt Limited v. Honda Cars India Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a retired Supreme Court judge as arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, clarifying that allegations in arbitration petitions do not affect arbitrator appointment and referring interim relief applications to the arbitrator.
Nastor Farirai Ziso v. NCB
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused under Sections 9A and 25A of the NDPS Act, holding that the bar under Section 37 does not apply to controlled substances and emphasizing the constitutional right to personal liberty.
Dinesh Chaudhary v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No.204/2020 and all proceedings against the petitioner based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers.
SI GD Pradeep v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the medical unfitness declaration of a CAPF LDCE candidate with varicose veins, affirming that medical standards for direct recruits apply equally to LDCE candidates and the Government’s discretion in medical acceptance is final.
Surinder Pal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination from Sahastra Seema Bal for failure to complete training within prescribed time, emphasizing strict adherence to training rules and condemning suppression of material facts.