Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
PhonePe Private Limited v. EZY Services & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction application, holding that the defendants' use of 'BharatPe' does not infringe the plaintiff's 'PhonePe' trademark as the suffix 'Pe' is descriptive and not exclusively protectable.
Megha Enterprises and Ors. v. M/s Haldiram Snacks Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that electronic acknowledgment of debt validly resets limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, dismissing the petition challenging the award.
PETA India v. Asiad Circus
The Delhi High Court allowed PETA India's petition to ensure lifelong care of a hippopotamus by a certified welfare trust and directed government authorities to frame rules for exotic animals not covered under existing wildlife laws.
SH Ajay Kumar and Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 386/2015 and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
National Highways Authority of India v. Vijaywada Tollways Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interlocutory order restraining recovery of ₹16.77 crores by the arbitral tribunal, leaving the order intact until the final award is passed.
Ram Vilas @ Monu & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's non-objection to prosecution.
Ashok Kumar and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent not to prosecute further.
Sunil v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 385/2020 and all proceedings arising therefrom based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their unwillingness to continue prosecution.
M/S CL INTERNATIONAL v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE
The Delhi High Court held that an entity placed on the Denied Entity List must be supplied the material relied upon and given a personal hearing before a final order is passed, ensuring compliance with natural justice.
S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. v. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's award permitting future interest on interest and directed adjustment of security deposits against the awarded amount as on the award date, refusing to reopen disputes at enforcement.
S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. v. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting future interest on pre-award interest and directed adjustment of security deposits against awarded amounts as of the award date, refusing to revisit calculation disputes at enforcement.
S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. v. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting future interest on awarded amounts including pre-award interest and clarified that security deposits must be adjusted against the awarded sum at the date of the award, rejecting fresh disputes at enforcement stage.
S. E. Investments Ltd. v. Shakuntla Educational & Welfare Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting future interest on awarded amounts including interest thereon and clarified that security deposits must be adjusted against principal and pre-reference interest as on the award date, refusing to entertain fresh disputes at enforcement stage.
Jankalyan Lakshya Foundation v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the DDA's cancellation of a lease and sealing of premises, leaving enforcement to proceed and related petitions to be adjudicated separately.
Raj Sharma v. The General Manager, N. Rly
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve contractual disputes between the petitioner and Northern Railway, overriding the respondent's contractual right to appoint the arbitrator.
Hassad Food Company Q.S.C. v. Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Recovery Certificate and related orders, holding that the petitioner must exhaust statutory remedies including mandatory pre-deposit before invoking writ jurisdiction.
S. E. Investments Ltd. v. Shakuntla Educational & Welfare Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting future interest on pre-award interest and directed adjustment of security deposits against principal and pre-reference interest as on the award date, refusing to entertain fresh disputes at enforcement stage.
Geeta Rai Devi v. Shushila Devi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to allow amendment of the written statement to alter admitted facts regarding tenancy and construction dates, emphasizing that admissions in pleadings cannot be withdrawn to deny legal benefits.
Mahesh Namkeen Pvt Ltd v. Om Prakash Nebhwani Trading as Mahesh Matar Namkeen
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s plea to have the Local Commissioner inspect the actual premises where infringing goods were stored, emphasizing that procedural compliance should not defeat the purpose of the injunction.
NEW OM CONSTRUCTION CO. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court appointed a qualified engineer as arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve contract disputes arising from a construction work order.