Delhi High Court
36,653 judgments
Geeta Sinha v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction as the impugned order was passed by an authority outside Delhi and no part of the cause of action arose there.
Rohini Educational Society and Anr v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed property tax demand notices due to incorrect computation and lack of personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh assessment.
Pravesh Dhawan & Ors. v. Jatin Dhawan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order rejecting the defendants' application to dismiss a suit based on an unregistered family settlement, holding the suit maintainable and emphasizing the limited scope of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Dr. Arjun Saili v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that respondents cannot retain a candidate's original documents beyond course completion without express contractual authority and must recover dues through legal proceedings.
Pawan Puri v. The State
The Delhi High Court held that legal heirs of a deceased Executor are entitled to Letters of Administration with the Will annexed after Probate has been granted but before full estate administration, allowing conversion of Probate into Letters of Administration without fresh proceedings.
M/S RAJIV GANDHI CANCER INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, DELHI (NORTH)
The Delhi High Court held that orders imposing interest under Section 7Q and damages under Section 14B arising from common proceedings should be treated as composite and appealable together before the Tribunal, directing the petitioner to challenge the interest demand before the Tribunal rather than by writ petition.
Pramod Gupta & Anr. v. Cyber Media Research and Services Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the respondents must finalize the Qualified IPO strictly as per Clause 8.1.2 of the Shareholders' Agreement, leaving other disputes to arbitration and disposing of the petition accordingly.
Gaurav Enterprises v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that orders under Sections 7Q and 14B of the EPF Act arising from common proceedings are composite and appealable before the CGIT, allowing the writ petition to stay coercive action on the interest demand.
Varun Moudgil & Ors. v. Neena Khatry
The Delhi High Court upheld the execution of a consent decree enforcing a Settlement Agreement with strict timelines, rejecting the appellants' belated extension plea and confirming that the agreement itself operated as a power of attorney for sale of properties.
Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Department of Social Welfare & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that contractual Data Entry Operators have no absolute right to prevent change of contractor under mandatory government procurement rules, provided existing employees are retained on current terms pending regularization claims.
Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Department of Social Welfare & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Government's right to procure Data Entry Operator services through the GeM portal while directing retention of existing contractual employees and maintenance of their service conditions during pending regularization proceedings.
Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Department of Social Welfare & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that contractual Data Entry Operators must be retained with unchanged service conditions under new contractors procured via GeM portal, while regularization claims proceed before labour courts.
Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Department of Social Welfare & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that while the Government must comply with mandatory procurement via the GeM portal, existing contractual Data Entry Operators must be retained with unchanged service conditions during pending regularization proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Kiran Tandon v. State of NCT (Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order disposing of an appeal as withdrawn with liberty to re-file, holding that failure to avail the liberty and delay barred relief.
PNB Housing Finance Limited v. Parulben Pareshbhai Thakkar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act due to the petitioner’s failure to serve respondents and initiate arbitration, negating urgency and bona fides.
BLS International Services Limited v. M/S Digicall Global Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award in favor of Digicall, dismissing BLS's challenge based on alleged patent illegality and unsubstantiated counter claims of deficient services.
National Highways Authority of India v. Wainganga Expressway Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order granting partial relief to the concessionaire pending final arbitration in a dispute over Additional Concession Fee under a highway concession agreement.
Bhumika Chawla v. Jaswant Rai Chawla
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's grant of divorce on grounds of mental cruelty where the wife voluntarily consumed poison and lodged police complaints against the husband, causing irretrievable breakdown of marriage.
Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Department of Social Welfare & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that contractual Data Entry Operators can be retained under new contractors procured via the GeM portal without change in service conditions, dismissing petitions seeking to restrain such procurement.
Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Department of Social Welfare & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that while contractual Data Entry Operators' service conditions must be maintained during pending regularization claims, the government can lawfully change contractors via GeM procurement provided existing DEOs are retained with unchanged wages and conditions.