Delhi High Court
76,521 judgments
Sukhbir Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to decide the petitioner's claim for pension and retiral benefits within eight weeks by passing a reasoned order after hearing him, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Kailash Kumari Sharma v. Kamla Devi through her Legal Heirs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a trial court must frame an issue and allow evidence on disputed service of summons before dismissing an application to set aside an ex parte decree under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.
Master Akash Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the statutory minimum age of 17 years for NEET eligibility, dismissing a petition seeking relaxation for an underage candidate and affirming deference to expert regulatory bodies in academic matters.
Maan Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that a multistate scheduled cooperative bank authorized by RBI qualifies as a 'Commercial Bank' under tender conditions, quashing the disqualification of bids based on non-acceptance of its bank guarantees.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Anita Rani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld workmen's entitlement to arrears and regularization subject to correct calculation, directing remand for discrepancies and dismissing petitions in view of a clarifying circular.
Amit Meharia v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption of sensitive matrimonial complaint information from RTI disclosure under Section 8(1)(j), emphasizing available alternative legal remedies and protecting privacy.
Amit Meharia v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC’s refusal to disclose sensitive personal information under RTI, emphasizing privacy protections and availability of alternate legal remedies.
M/S SHEEL BIOTECH LTD v. RAM BAHADUR YADAV
The Delhi High Court modified an ex-parte Labour Court award reinstating an employee by substituting reinstatement with lump sum compensation under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, due to the Management's negligence and delay.
Pawan Buildwell Pvt Ltd v. Bajaj Finance Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous following a subsequent NCLT order, holding that a secured creditor not in default may retain security but cannot have claims admitted barred under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
MAAN PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. v. EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to replace Performance Bank Guarantees issued by a scheduled cooperative bank with those from a Scheduled Commercial Bank as per tender conditions, allowing compliance within a stipulated timeframe.
Divyam Shekhawat v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the cut-off date for submission of provisional degree certificates in SSC recruitment, holding that eligibility criteria in advertisements are binding and non-compliance justifies disqualification without violating natural justice.
Amit Meharia v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption of personal information under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005, denying disclosure of sensitive matrimonial complaint details while affirming availability of alternative legal remedies.
Experion Developers Pvt Ltd v. Larsen & Toubro Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of cross-appeals between Experion Developers and Larsen & Toubro by recording and enforcing their mutually agreed settlement.
Medeor Hospital Limited v. Ernst and Young LLP
The Delhi High Court upheld a majority arbitral award awarding success fees to EY, holding that an award signed by the majority of arbitrators is valid despite dissent and that the share sale fell within the engagement scope.
Madan Lama v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to a Nepalese drug supplier accused of possessing 475 grams of charas, distinguishing his case from a co-accused granted bail for small quantity possession, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence and flight risk.
Upendra Prakash Balodi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as premature for non-exhaustion of the statutory remedy under Section 131(2) of the Sashastra Seema Bal Act, 2007, directing the petitioner to first file the prescribed petition before the competent authority.
Vimlesh Agnihotri & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a rape FIR on the ground of compromise, reaffirming that offences under Section 376 IPC are non-compoundable and cannot be quashed merely due to settlement between parties.
Pankaj Goyal v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of kidnapping for ransom, holding that prima facie evidence of his knowledge of the conspiracy was lacking and the question of complicity is to be decided at trial.
Nisha Tayal v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused of kidnapping and ransom under Section 364A IPC, holding that a prima facie case exists against her and bail is not warranted at this stage.
M/S Bhushan Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court modified a two-year blacklisting order against a pharmaceutical company due to employee-submitted fabricated reports, reducing the debarment period as disproportionate while upholding the company's responsibility for employee actions.