Delhi High Court
76,343 judgments
Distress Management Collective v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to consider the petitioner's representation on permitting visitors in religious places under COVID-19 protocols but declined to grant a writ mandating reopening.
Anshul Arora v. Welcome India Visit Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 directing a bank manager to appear as a witness and produce original bank statements before the arbitrator.
V. C. Jain v. Radha Kishan Poddar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court fixed reasonable user and occupation charges payable by a tenant during the stay of an eviction order based on market rent of comparable properties, emphasizing compensation to landlords for delay in possession.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, NEW DELHI v. FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR INDIA PVT. LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS NXP INDIA PVT. LTD.)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals challenging the ITAT's exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing assessments for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10, finding no substantial question of law.
M/S NEW INDIA MOTORS (NEW DELHI) PVT LTD. & ORS. v. M/S NORTHERN INDIA IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenant company for subletting premises to distinct legal entities despite common management, affirming the principle of separate corporate identity and deferring to concurrent factual findings under Article 227.
Ram Udagar Mahto v. State
The Delhi High Court held that obtaining fresh blood samples at the trial stage is permissible further investigation under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. and does not violate the accused's constitutional rights against self-incrimination.
V. C. Jain v. Radha Kishan Poddar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court fixed reasonable user and occupation charges payable by the tenant during the stay of an eviction order based on market rent of comparable premises, emphasizing compensation to landlords for delay in possession.
M/S Siddharth Constructions Co. v. India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award denying damages and loss of profit claims for delay in contract completion, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Bimal Kumar Jain; Naresh Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that once a bail order is passed, it cannot be recalled or clarified under inherent powers due to the bar under Section 362 Cr.P.C., dismissing the petitioners' application seeking such relief.
Satinder Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for a petitioner accused of serious sexual offences involving false matrimonial representation, emphasizing careful consideration of gravity and investigation stage.
Bimal Kumar Jain; Naresh Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that once a bail order is passed and signed, it cannot be recalled or reviewed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. except in exceptional circumstances, and dismissed the petitioners' application seeking recall or clarification of observations regarding Section 45 of the PMLA.
Hari Singh v. M S Superhouse Ltd.
Revision petition challenging interlocutory order in a commercial dispute is not maintainable under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and such suits must be adjudicated by Commercial Courts.
Religare Finvest Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that the Income Tax Department cannot recover more than 20% of disputed tax demand during appeal pendency without specific reasons and must refund excess amounts recovered without following prescribed procedures.
Azad Singh @ Mamu v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court refused anticipatory bail to a petitioner with serious criminal antecedents and grievous injury allegations, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation and risk of absconding.
Shriraj Investment and Finance Limited & Ors. v. Union of India Thr. Secretary & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the initiation of company proceedings before the NCLT, holding that exclusive statutory remedies under the Companies Act preclude writ jurisdiction except in extraordinary cases.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Freescale Semiconductor India Pvt. Ltd. (Now Known As NXP India Pvt. Ltd.)
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging the ITAT's exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing assessments, reaffirming the binding effect of prior decisions under Rule 10B(4) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
Ved Prakash Aggarwal v. Deputy Registrar, National Green Tribunal, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against rejection of an RTI application, holding that a writ petition is not maintainable when an alternate statutory appeal remedy exists.
Ajay Pal Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the acquittal under Section 506 IPC, holding that mere threats without means to execute or causing alarm do not constitute criminal intimidation.
S.K. Verma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with proper averments and supporting documents, disposing of the petition and pending applications.
Shriraj Investment and Finance Limited & Ors. v. Union of India Thr. Secretary & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the Central Government's initiation of company proceedings before the NCLT, holding that exclusive statutory remedies under the Companies Act bar writ jurisdiction and that the Court lacks territorial jurisdiction.