Savita Jain v. Rajni Malpani; Savita Jain v. Mukesh Malpani

Delhi High Court · 16 Sep 2021 · 2021:DHC:4436
Najmi Waziri
CONT.CAS(C)466/2021; CONT.CAS(C)468/2021
2021:DHC:4436
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions as infructuous after respondents complied with the impugned order and directed filing of a compliance affidavit.

Full Text
Translation output
V
$-15 & 16(1)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)466/2021
SAVITA JAIN SOLEPROPRIETOR M/S NAVKAR SALES .....Petitioner
Through: Mr NamitSuri and Ms Shivani Malik, Advocates.
VERSUS
RAJNI MALPANI SOLE PROPRIETOR M/S KRISHNA SALES Respondent
Through: Mr Abhinav,Advocate.
>- CONT.CAS(C)468/2021 SAVITA JAIN SOLE PROPRIETOR
M/S NAVKAR SALES Petitioner
Through: Mr Namit Suri and Ms Shivani Malik, Advocates.
VERSUS
MUKESH MALPANIPARTNER KRISHNA PACKAGING & ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr Abhinav,Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
16.09.2021 The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).
ORDER

1. The learned counsel for the respondents states, upon instructions,that the impugned order against which the instant petitions have been filed,has been complied with.Letcompliance affidavit be filed by the respondents within four weeks.

2. Nothing survives in the petitions and the same are disposed-off 2021:DHC:4436 accordingly, with liberty to the parties to approach the Court in case ofdifficulty.

NAJMI WAZIRI,J