Delhi High Court
76,343 judgments
Sadiq@ Sahil v. The State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to a petitioner involved in the 2020 Delhi riots where he was identified on CCTV actively participating in violence leading to police officer's death, affirming that members of an unlawful assembly are vicariously liable under Section 149 IPC and bail discretion must consider gravity of offence.
VRG Energy India Pvt. Ltd. - Avni Traders v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s bid was wrongly rejected due to incorrect interpretation of turnover criteria in the tender, directing reassessment in accordance with the tender conditions.
LAGAAM v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to consider and act on the petitioner's complaint regarding encroachments on pedestrian pathways in a time-bound manner in accordance with law.
Reebok International Limited v. Focus Energy Limited
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing execution of foreign arbitral awards due to prior legal uncertainty on limitation, following the Supreme Court's Vedanta Ltd. ruling.
Shahnawaz v. The State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged with murder during the 2020 Delhi riots, holding that bail denial in unlawful assembly cases involving serious offences requires careful fact-based discretion and that prolonged pre-trial detention without conclusive evidence violates constitutional liberty.
DVR Anil Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging dismissal from service, holding that the disciplinary inquiry was fair and the petitioner’s habitual misconduct justified the punishment.
Akash Builders v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed the arbitrator as agreed by the parties under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, referring the disputes to arbitration without expressing any opinion on their merits.
Akash Builders v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed the agreed arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, referring the disputes for arbitration while leaving all substantive issues open for the arbitral tribunal.
Akash Builders v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed the agreed arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, referring the disputes for arbitration while leaving all substantive issues open for the arbitral tribunal.
Ajay Kumar v. Manoj Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Rent Controller's refusal to implead the petitioner as a joint tenant in eviction proceedings due to inordinate delay and lack of documentary proof.
Technocrats Advisory Services Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the respondent's failure to timely nominate its arbitrator as per the contract terms.
Anju Parwani and Anr. v. Ashwani Parwani and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a partition suit by incorporating a valid mediated settlement agreement into the decree, thereby amicably resolving the property dispute among family members.
Mayank Agrawal v. Jaiprakash Associates Limited
The Delhi High Court held that it has territorial jurisdiction to refer disputes to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, despite conflicting jurisdiction clauses, and allowed the petition to refer the dispute to arbitration at New Delhi.
Taikisha Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the award of a tender under the Make in India Policy, holding that the petitioner could not alter its declared local content post-bid and that the award to the next lowest local supplier who matched the price was lawful.
CEC-CICI JV v. GRIM-TECH PROJECTS INDIA (P) LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing subcontractor's claims as within limitation and rejecting main contractor's counter-claims for rectification costs due to non-compliance with contractual defect notification requirements.
H S Oberoi Buildtech Pvt. Ltd v. Mahamaya Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the Court’s power to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act is not restricted by contractual panels and appointed an arbitrator independently after the petitioner defaulted in selection.
Akash Builders v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes between Akash Builders and Northern Railway, leaving all substantive issues to arbitration.
Union of India v. M/S Rama Contractor
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by limitation, holding that the delay beyond the statutory three months and thirty days could not be condoned without bona fide and diligent prosecution.
KLA Const Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. The Embassy of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
The Delhi High Court decreed an execution petition enforcing an arbitral award in terms of a Settlement Agreement between KLA Const Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and the Embassy of Afghanistan, recalling prior interim orders.
Dr. Maheep Kumar Meena v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 376 IPC on the basis of a settlement, holding that offences of rape are non-compoundable and affect society at large, thus not amenable to quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.