Delhi High Court
76,032 judgments
Cyfuture India Private Limited v. Futuretimes Technology India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that once an Arbitral Tribunal is constituted, courts should generally defer interim relief applications under Section 9 to the Tribunal under Section 17 unless the Tribunal remedy is inefficacious, and existing interim orders continue until the Tribunal decides.
Jamshed Ansari & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging transfer and clarified that irrelevant tribunal observations would not affect the petitioners' career progression.
CYFUTURE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. FUTURETIMES TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that after constitution of the arbitral tribunal, interim relief applications under Section 9 must be relegated to the tribunal unless the Section 17 remedy is inefficacious, and accordingly directed the petitions to be decided by the arbitrator.
Manoj Jain v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier judgments, with interest on delayed arrears and procedural safeguards.
AXIS TRUSTEE SERVICES LIMITED v. BRIJ BHUSHAN SINGAL & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed rectification of an order to remove an erroneous direction permitting a written statement in a summary suit under Order 37 CPC, affirming the court's power under Section 152 CPC to correct clerical errors.
Hans Ram Chandawat v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier decisions, with interest on arrears and procedural safeguards.
Association of Industries and Institutions v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the legal basis for mandatory Aadhaar seeding with UAN under the EPF Act but granted interim relief extending the deadline and prohibiting penalties pending final adjudication.
Dy. Comdt. Ramesh Kumar Punia v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of a CAPF officer after respondents offered accommodations and directed the petitioner to join the new posting within a stipulated time.
MS PVR LIMITED v. MS TIRUPATI BUILDINGS AND OFFICES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that failure to comply with a non-specific pre-arbitration amicable resolution requirement does not bar arbitration and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rajesh Kumar Tomar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under the ITBP Act, a person tried by a General Force Court is entitled to copies of proceedings only after confirmation of findings and sentence, and dismissed the petition seeking pre-confirmation access to records.
VISIONS APROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MS PAYAL KAPOOR v. MEGA MALL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and referred the disputes between the parties to arbitration under DIAC, appointing a sole arbitrator.
M/S. AUTO MOVERS v. LUMINOUS POWER TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's jurisdiction to try a suit for recovery of price where part of the cause of action, including payments, arose in Delhi despite the defendant being located in West Bengal.
R C S Panwar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the disciplinary penalty imposed for unauthorized recording and circulation of official audio, upholding the penalty after finding due process was followed.
METRO HERITAGE PVT. LTD v. STERLING HOLIDAY RESORTS LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed the Presiding Arbitrator to complete the three-member Arbitral Tribunal as per the arbitration agreement when party-appointed arbitrators failed to agree.
Deepak Sharma & Anr. v. Sriniwaspuri Mitra Mandal CGHS Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the dispute resolution mechanism under the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 ousts Civil Court jurisdiction, and the Arbitration Act does not override this bar, dismissing the appellants' Section 9 petition.
M/S NO.1 WORLD WIDE EXPRESS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral admission of tax liability does not constitute 'quantification' by the department under SVLDRS, dismissing the petitioner's claim for scheme benefits due to lack of written quantification before the cut-off date.
Uttar Pradesh State Rifle Association v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interim order directing authorities to decide representations on the tenure and election issues of a sports association President, permitting further proceedings before the Single Judge.
GIESECKE AND DEVRIENT MS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OSD RANGE 10 & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authorities to dispose of the petitioner's rectification application within six weeks and pay any refund due, emphasizing the statutory duty of timely disposal without adjudicating the substantive tax dispute.
M/S GULAB OIL AND FOOD (AHMEDABAD) PVT. LTD. v. SMT. MADHU GUPTA
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining the appellant from using the 'Gulab' trademark on Namkeen products, affirming protection of a registered mark with established goodwill against passing off.
Hem Singh v. Raj Kumar Saini and Anr
The High Court allowed the appeal restoring the application disposed of without notice, permitted repair work under strict conditions, and directed monitoring by a Court Commissioner.