Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Omwati v. The Bank of Maharashtra and Anr

26 Sep 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:8676
Cites 9 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Bank’s policy of including notional interest income from terminal benefits in family income calculation, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for ex-gratia payment under compassionate appointment scheme.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant ex-gratia payment compassionate appointment notional interest income terminal benefits

Naresh Batra v. Anand Prakash Bansal

26 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8600-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the decree of specific performance, holding that the plaintiff proved continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract under the Agreements to Sell.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act Agreement to Sell

Poonam Agarwal v. Government of NCT

26 Sep 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:8681
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that non-renewal of a contractual employee’s contract contrary to established appraisal policy and motivated by pregnancy was arbitrary, entitling her to contract renewal and maternity benefits with compensation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant contract renewal performance appraisal maternity benefits maternity leave

Sallauddin v. The State NCT of Delhi

26 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8680

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a murder case, emphasizing that prolonged pre-trial detention violates the right to speedy trial under Article 21, despite the seriousness of charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail prolonged pre-trial detention right to speedy trial Article 21

State of Delhi v. Shyam & Anr

26 Sep 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:8672

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Sections 325/323/34 IPC and dismissed the State's appeal seeking conviction under Section 308 IPC, affirming that grievous injuries without intention or knowledge to cause death do not attract Section 308 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 308 IPC grievous hurt intention to cause death probation of good behaviour

CROCS INC v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS NEW DELHI & ANR.

26 Sep 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:8660

The Delhi High Court allowed Crocs Inc.'s petition to cancel a deceptively similar trademark registration, holding that the impugned mark infringed the prior registered 'CROCS' mark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Trademark cancellation Deceptive similarity Prior user

Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v. Bhanwar Lal Dhabhai and Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:8659
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against Defendant No. 1 for infringing the registered trademark "SANDVIK" by using deceptively similar marks on identical goods, establishing liability for trademark infringement and passing off.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Permanent injunction Deceptively similar marks

ChamelI Devi v. Ashwani Kumar & Anr.

26 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:8675

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief under Article 227 preventing MCD from demolishing the petitioner's property until the non-functional Appellate Tribunal MCD hears the stay application.

administrative petition_allowed Article 227 Constitution of India Appellate Tribunal MCD interim relief stay application

Manish Kumar Giri alias Sabi Giri v. Union of India and Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8653-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court referred to a Full Bench the question of whether the Armed Forces Tribunal can adjudicate constitutional challenges to statutory provisions like Section 9 of the Navy Act, holding that such challenges generally lie within the exclusive jurisdiction of constitutional courts.

constitutional other Significant Armed Forces Tribunal Navy Act constitutional validity jurisdiction

M/S DEN DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT NETWORKS PVT LTD v. M/S EXPLORER ASSOCIATES

26 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:8683

The High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to allow additional evidence before the defendant's evidence commenced, emphasizing that disputes must be decided on merits rather than procedural defaults.

civil appeal_dismissed additional evidence trial court discretion Article 227 Constitution of India leading evidence

Helsinn Healthcare SA v. AET Laboratories Private Limited & Anr

26 Sep 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:8655

The Delhi High Court vacated the interim injunction against defendants for patent infringement, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish imminent threat or territorial jurisdiction for quia timet relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant quia timet injunction patent infringement territorial jurisdiction Order XXXIX CPC

Varinder Kaur v. Daljit Kaur & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela; Devendra Kumar Upadhya... · 2025:DHC:8641-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a gift deed executed by a senior citizen can be declared void under Section 23(1) of the Senior Citizens Act even without an express maintenance condition if the transferee fails to provide basic amenities and physical needs, affirming the cancellation of the gift deed in favor of the appellant.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Senior Citizens Act Section 23(1) gift deed cancellation basic amenities

BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR v. KAMESWAR RAO

26 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8710-DB

The Delhi High Court holds that both Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers have concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment under Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to this view.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 148 Income-Tax Act Faceless Assessing Officer Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Reassessment proceedings

Huawei Technologies Cooperatief U.A. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation-2(1)(1), Delhi

26 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8708-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices issued without information of escapement of income and directed the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh reasoned order considering all relevant facts and tax provisions.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Section 194LC

Bed Ram v. Union of India & Anr.

26 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, holding that 'Sailabi' land lacking building potential justifies lower valuation and that claimants failed to prove entitlement to higher compensation based on adjacent lands.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 fair market value Sailabi land compensation enhancement

Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. v. Svera Agro Limited & Anr.

26 Sep 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:8797

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction protecting Tata's well-known trademarks and packaging against infringing rock salt products, exempted pre-institution mediation due to urgency, and ordered refund of court fees following early settlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trade Mark infringement Well-known trademark Permanent injunction Trade dress

Amit Kumar v. Union of India

26 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8651-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the ex parte dismissal of a CRPF constable due to violation of natural justice in departmental enquiry and remanded for fresh enquiry ensuring right to cross-examination and defence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry natural justice right to cross-examination CRPF Act 1949

Dropadi Tripathi v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 895
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing grant of disability pension for hypertension to an Army retiree, holding that absent medical evidence attributing the disability to a non-service cause, the disability must be presumed service-connected.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disability pension military service causal connection Release Medical Board

Naveen Vedi v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8718-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to dispose of the petitioner’s representation under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act within three weeks, emphasizing timely administrative action before considering suspension of sentence.

criminal other Procedural writ petition suspension of sentence Section 117(2) BSF Act, 1968 Section 118 BSF Act, 1968

Attar Singh v. Union of India

26 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8714-DB

The Delhi High Court directed substitution of the petitioner’s daughter as the family pension beneficiary following the death of the original beneficiary, the petitioner’s wife.

administrative petition_allowed family pension Central Reserve Police Force pension beneficiary substitution retiral benefits