Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Shomit Finance Limited v. Mahesh Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227, upholding the dismissal of the consumer appeal for non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s repeated inaction and failure to comply with procedural requirements.
Amit Malviya v. Samajwadi Party Media Cell & Ors
The Delhi High Court granted an ad interim injunction restraining defamatory social media posts against a political public figure, balancing freedom of speech with the right to reputation.
Sunayana Sibal & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the relocation of dairies from hazardous landfill-adjacent sites to safer, well-equipped locations to protect public health and animal welfare, emphasizing the State's duty and issuing procedural directions for implementation.
Utpal Tripathi v. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed visitation and procedural compliance in a divorce petition involving a mentally ill wife admitted to a rehabilitation centre, emphasizing welfare and capacity considerations.
Rajeev Mohan v. M/S. Delton Cables Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court referred the dispute to arbitration under DIAC, directing appointment of an arbitrator and compliance with statutory disclosure requirements.
Select Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Advent Hospitality Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted a one-year extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon parties' consent.
Shiven Gupta and Ors. v. M/S Green Bay Infrastructure Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of an arbitration petition by treating the mediated settlement agreement as a conciliated agreement with the status of an arbitral award under Sections 73 and 74 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Hiranand Kishinchand Gangwani v. Oyo Apartment Investment LLP
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
M/S RATNA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PVT LTD v. M/S MEJA URJA NIGAM PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the arbitrator by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing arbitration proceedings to continue.
M/S OM PRAKASH SURINDER MOHAN v. AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD
The Delhi High Court allowed the joint petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by one year under Sections 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Lacoste & Anr. v. Crocodile International Pte Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Lacoste owns the copyright and trademark rights in the standalone crocodile device in India, and the defendants' use of a similar device infringes those rights, rejecting defendants' claims under co-existence agreements and jurisdictional objections.
Man Kunwar v. Delhi Building and Other Construction Workers Board
The Delhi High Court held that registration under the BOCW Act can be restored despite delayed renewal caused by administrative hurdles, allowing pension benefits to the petitioner’s deceased husband.
The Commissioner of Police v. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the dismissal of a police officer for misconduct, holding that dismissal without departmental enquiry under Article 311(2)(b) requires valid, objective reasons and evidence.
Shree Bhavani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(3)
The Delhi High Court held that failure to electronically file the audit report under Section 80-IA(7) prior to its 2020 amendment is a procedural lapse not justifying reassessment under Section 148 absent escapement of income.
Vinod Kumar Solanki v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle- 61-1, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a mechanical, blanket approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act without application of mind is invalid, quashing the reassessment notice issued under Section 148.
Ram Niwas v. Principal Chief Security Commissioner and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a substituted penalty must take effect from the original penalty date, directing pay scale reduction to run from the date of dismissal and restoration of pay after the penalty period.
Jai Pal v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the BSF dismissal order due to procedural lapses in recording plea of guilty under Rule 142 but declined reinstatement, directing pensionary benefits and partial back wages.
Daljeet Singh Bhatia v. M/S Karamsar Electronics Pvt. Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of leave to defend in a summary suit, holding that a defence based on a blank cheque as security is a sham and does not raise a triable issue.
Inspector Naveen Kumar v. Sachin Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the factory owner from negligence charges under Section 285 IPC, holding no prima facie case was made out for negligent storage of acid used in an acid attack.
St. George School v. Director of Education & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that unaided minority schools are bound by Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act to implement pay commission recommendations and pay salaries, bonus, and allowances at par with government schools, dismissing the school's challenge to the DoE circular.