Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Astral Poly Technik Limited v. MS Dharti Pipe & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction protecting the trademark 'ASTRAL' against use of identical or deceptively similar marks by the Defendants, who consented to cease use and efface infringing marks from seized goods.
National Council for Teacher Education and Anr v. OM College of Education and Anr
The Delhi High Court affirmed that the NCTE holds exclusive authority to grant recognition to teacher education institutions and that the State Government cannot obstruct this process by refusing to nominate experts, with the NCTE empowered to relax regulations to ensure recognition proceeds.
National Council for Teacher Education and Anr v. OM College of Education and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the State Government cannot obstruct NCTE's grant of recognition to teacher education institutions and upheld the power of the NCTE Chairperson to relax procedural requirements when the State refuses to cooperate.
Apurv Shankar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the statutory requirement that candidates with foreign medical qualifications must have at least 50% marks in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology to be eligible for the Screening Test and registration in India, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the rejection of his application.
Delhi Development Authority v. Samar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting proportionate reduction in license fee due to partial possession of a parking site, rejecting DDA's challenge based on tender terms and patent illegality.
Anuj Kaicker & Anr. v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that when a defendant denies tenancy and claims ownership, the landlord's remedy lies in a civil suit for possession, which is not barred by the Delhi Rent Control Act.
INTEL CORPORATION v. RAKESH JAIN AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Intel Corporation against unauthorized use of its registered trademark 'CELERON' by defendants, rejecting their claim of Sanskrit origin and upholding trademark infringement and passing off.
Sanofi India Limited v. Ridley Life Science Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed habitual pharmaceutical trademark infringer Ridley Life Science Pvt. Ltd. to disclose all products and sales, deposit Rs. 1 crore security, and comply with injunctions to prevent further trademark violations and protect public health.
Court on its Own Motion v. State
The Delhi High Court held that Magistrates lack inherent power to discharge accused after issuance of process in summons trial cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, affirming that Section 258 CrPC does not apply to such complaints.
Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd v. Dr. Ashish Jain and Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that limitation and other preliminary objections must be decided by the arbitral tribunal, thereby preserving arbitral autonomy.
State v. Gauransh Godiyal @ Sandeep & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in an alleged kidnapping and ransom case due to contradictions in evidence, investigative deficiencies, and tampering of case property.
Priyanka Taksh Sood & Ors. v. Sunworld Residency Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes under real estate agreements containing arbitration clauses are arbitrable despite concurrent remedies under RERA, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the matter.
Kulan Rukhsana Amin & Ors. v. Gaurang Kanth & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking interim injunction restraining construction on disputed property, holding no change in circumstances or prima facie case to override prior dismissal and applying the doctrine of lis pendens.
Festus Chukwudi Odom v. NCB
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused of possessing intermediate quantities of heroin and cocaine under the NDPS Act, emphasizing that procedural violations are for trial and imposing strict bail conditions to mitigate risks.
Samadhan Management Services Pvt. Ltd and Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against a due diligence agency and its authorized signatory for facilitating a fraudulent bank loan by issuing a false verification report, emphasizing the duty to verify documents and the standard for charge framing.
Veena Garg v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking refund of earnest money forfeited due to failure to deposit the bid premium within the stipulated time as per the tender conditions.
Stenovate Synergies and Exports Private Limited & Anr. v. Falcon Synergies Hong Kong Limited & Anr.; BRG Tie Up Private Limited v. Falcon Synergies Hong Kong Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by accepting a lawful Settlement Agreement reached through mediation, directing parties to abide by its terms.
M/S TRAVEL RETAIL SERVICES PVT. LTD v. M/S THREE VEE MARKETING PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court directed disputes under a sub-licence agreement to arbitration, appointing a sole arbitrator to adjudicate claims and counter claims, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Mahesh Chand Khandelwal & Anr. v. Delhi Hardware Stores & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed reference of partnership disputes and counterclaims to arbitration at DIAC, appointing an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Delhi Development Authority v. M/S Watcon Water Specialists Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award on reimbursement of airlifting charges and interest, setting aside only the impermissible interest on interest, affirming limited judicial interference in arbitral contract interpretation.