Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Kinri Dhir v. Veer Singh

19 Apr 2022 · Yashwant Varma · 2022:DHC:1389
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of family court proceedings, holding that mere adverse orders or strong language do not establish judicial bias warranting transfer.

family petition_dismissed Significant transfer of proceedings apprehension of bias family court Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

Vibhor Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Anupama Kapoor & Ors.

19 Apr 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:1388

The Delhi High Court vacated an ex parte interim injunction in a suit for specific performance due to misrepresentation, lack of a binding contract, and insufficient readiness and willingness by the plaintiffs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction specific performance oral agreement to sell Order XXXIX CPC

Muduli Suprava v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Another

19 Apr 2022 · Asha Menon · 2022:DHC:1384

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging fraudulent promise of a DDA flat, holding that a prima facie case was made out and the accused must face trial.

criminal petition_dismissed quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C. fraud cheating

Indra Pasricha v. Deepika Chauhan & Ors.

19 Apr 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:1381

The Delhi High Court held that respondents who wilfully disobeyed a consent decree based on an undertaking given to the Court committed civil contempt, even though they were not original parties to the suit.

civil conviction_upheld Significant civil contempt consent decree undertaking to Court wilful disobedience

Abhinav Anand @ Babbal v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

19 Apr 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:1497

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ seeking parole release due to his unsatisfactory jail conduct and previous parole violations, upholding the rejection under Delhi Prison Rules, 2018.

criminal petition_dismissed parole Delhi Prison Rules 2018 jail conduct parole violation

Emeka Charles Omuka v. Narcotic Control Bureau

19 Apr 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:1424
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Bail was denied to the accused under Section 37 of the NDPS Act as the recovery involved commercial quantity of heroin and no reasonable grounds to believe innocence were found.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail NDPS Act Section 37 commercial quantity

Britannia Industries Ltd v. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd & Anr.

19 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1403

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining Parle from using Britannia's registered cookie design in advertisements and allowed amendment of plaint to include additional advertisements alleging similar infringement.

civil appeal_allowed permanent injunction design infringement advertisement disparagement Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Dwarka Private ITI v. Directorate General of Training & Anr.

19 Apr 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:1401

The Delhi High Court quashed the de-affiliation order against Dwarka Private ITI for violation of natural justice and directed a fresh inspection and restoration of affiliation pending further lawful action.

administrative petition_allowed Significant de-affiliation principles of natural justice show cause notice inspection report

Stenovate Synergies and Exports Private Limited & Anr. v. Falcon Synergies Hong Kong Limited & Anr.; BRG Tie Up Private Limited v. Falcon Synergies Hong Kong Limited & Anr.

19 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1400

The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions challenging an arbitral award by enforcing a lawful Settlement Agreement reached through mediation, modifying the award and waiving interest and costs.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Arbitral award Settlement Agreement

McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited v. Steel Authority of India Limited

19 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:1683
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ICA Arbitral Tribunal's order requiring separate payment of arbitration fees for claims and counter-claims under ICA Rules, dismissing the petition challenging the fee calculation.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ICA Rules Arbitrators' fees Administrative charges

Pravin Kumar v. The Registrar Co-operative Societies and Anr.

19 Apr 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:1603-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s father was exempt from the residency requirement for cooperative society membership under valid government circulars, set aside the rejection of allotment recommendation, and directed the Registrar Cooperative Societies to forward the petitioner’s case for flat allotment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 residency requirement cooperative housing society membership government circulars

SPLENDOR BUILDWELL PVT LTD & ANR. v. RAJESH KUMAR PASRICHA

19 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:1452

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral tribunal's interim order directing security of disputed assured returns, holding that mere pendency of cases and prima facie claim do not justify such relief without cogent material showing risk of asset dissipation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 17 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Interim measures Assured returns Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC

Modicare Limited v. Registrar of Trademarks

19 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1461

Delhi High Court allowed Modicare's appeals to register 'ACHIEVERS ACADEMY' trademarks with conditions including prefixing the house mark 'MODICARE' to avoid conflict with prior similar marks.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark registration ACHIEVERS ACADEMY house mark distinctiveness

Commissioner of Customs v. S R Traders

19 Apr 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:1445-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Customs Department's appeal, upholding that no limitation period applies to refund claims involving Special Additional Customs Duty, following coordinate bench precedents.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Special Additional Customs Duty refund claim limitation period Customs Act

Anita Saxena v. Ajit Saxena

19 Apr 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:1594-DB

The Delhi High Court enhanced the pendente lite maintenance awarded to the wife under the Hindu Marriage Act after finding the husband had understated his income to evade maintenance obligations.

family appeal_allowed Significant pendente lite maintenance Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C.

Sourabh Khatri v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

19 Apr 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:1465

Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of murder and arms offences due to grave allegations, corroborated evidence, and threats to witnesses despite chargesheet being filed.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 439 Cr.P.C murder Section 302 IPC

Kamla Devi v. Jeet Singh & Anr

19 Apr 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:1458
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic dismissal of an employee compensation claim for lack of reasons and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 compensation claim non-application of mind recording of reasons

Modicare Limited v. Registrar of Trademarks

19 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1460

The Delhi High Court allowed Modicare's appeals to register 'ACHIEVERS ACADEMY' trademarks subject to adding the house mark 'MODICARE' and limiting the description to direct selling business, balancing prior marks and acquired distinctiveness.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark registration ACHIEVERS ACADEMY House mark Distinctiveness

Commissioner of Customs New Delhi (ICD TKD) v. Radial Rubber Industries

19 Apr 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:1446-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Customs Department's appeal, holding that no limitation period applies to refund claims involving Special Additional Customs Duty, following coordinate bench precedents.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Special Additional Customs Duty refund claim limitation period Customs Act

Modicare Limited v. Registrar of Trademarks

19 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1459

The Delhi High Court allowed Modicare's appeals for registration of the trademark 'ACHIEVERS ACADEMY' subject to prefixing the house mark 'MODICARE' and restricting the scope to direct selling business, directing advertisement despite prior similar marks.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark registration ACHIEVERS ACADEMY House mark Distinctiveness