Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Tepander Giri v. SHO & Ors.

29 Mar 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:1120

The Delhi High Court held that in corruption allegations against public servants, preliminary inquiry before FIR registration is permissible under Lalita Kumari, and dismissed the petition seeking immediate FIR registration.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant FIR registration Preliminary inquiry Prevention of Corruption Act Section 154 CrPC

Deepayan Mohanty v. Cargill India Pvt Ltd & Ors.

29 Mar 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:1181

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing written statements in a summary suit, holding that limitation commenced after the Supreme Court stayed the deposit condition and COVID-19 related limitation exclusions apply.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary suit condonation of delay written statement limitation period

National Highways Authority of India v. Oriental Nagpur Betul Highways Private Limited

29 Mar 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1129

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by enforcing the parties' lawful Settlement Agreement resolving their arbitration dispute.

civil petition_allowed Settlement Agreement Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Arbitral Award

Abinash Kumar and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

29 Mar 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:1131-DB

The Delhi High Court directed grant of pro-rata pension to discharged Airmen in line with prior judgments, holding discriminatory exclusion of non-commissioned defence personnel unconstitutional.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pro-rata pension defence service pension commissioned officers Airmen

Hindustan Engineering and Industries Limited v. SpiceJet Limited

29 Mar 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:1104-DB

The Delhi High Court permitted sale of shares at prevailing market price instead of earlier fixed price due to drastic fall in share value and liquidation of the company, directing proceeds to be secured with the Court.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant share sale fixed price market price dematerialization

Amit Srivastava v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd & Ors.

29 Mar 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:1132-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the transfer of a government employee with a specially abled child, holding that the transfer to an equidistant location did not violate exemption policies, while directing facilitation of uninterrupted medical treatment.

administrative appeal_dismissed transfer order specially abled dependent Office Memorandum 08.10.2018 intellectual disability

Sacheerome Advanced Technologies v. NEC Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

29 Mar 2022 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2022:DHC:1155

The Delhi High Court held that challenges to an arbitrator’s appointment on grounds of bias must follow the procedure under Section 13 and cannot be raised by a petition under Section 14(2) before the arbitral award is rendered, dismissing the petitioner’s request to terminate the arbitrator’s mandate.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14(2) Section 13 challenge Arbitrator impartiality

Mohd. Imran v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

29 Mar 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:1118

The Delhi High Court set aside the proclamation declaring the petitioner a proclaimed offender under Section 82 Cr.P.C. due to procedural irregularities and non-application of mind, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory procedure and recording of reasons.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 82 Cr.P.C. proclaimed offender proclaimed person non-application of mind

Marshal Infradevelopers India Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

29 Mar 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:1184
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that invocation of a Performance Bank Guarantee must strictly comply with its terms, and restrained invocation where the demand failed to specify loss or damage caused by breach of contract.

civil petition_allowed Significant Performance Bank Guarantee invocation of bank guarantee contract termination interim relief

M/S MUCHIPARA CONSUMERS CO-OPERATIVE STORES LTD. v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & ANR.

28 Mar 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:1215-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition challenging forfeiture of earnest money in an e-auction conducted before relevant guidelines, granting liberty to seek departmental relief.

administrative appeal_dismissed forfeiture of earnest money e-auction government circular as is where is basis

Jitender Nath v. Central Board of Direct Taxes and Others

28 Mar 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1116-DB W.P.(C) 4847/2022

The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authorities to dispose of the petitioner’s stay application with a reasoned order and personal hearing within four weeks, restraining coercive action meanwhile.

tax petition_allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 246A Section 220(6) Section 144

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Teracom Limited

28 Mar 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2022:DHC:1091

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing BSNL to refund the encashed Performance Bank Guarantee and outstanding dues to Teracom, rejecting BSNL's claim of forfeiture and set off.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Performance Bank Guarantee Forfeiture Set off Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Dharmalingam v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Mar 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:1127-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to represent against recovery of excess salary paid during service post-retirement and stayed enforcement of recovery orders pending such consideration.

administrative other excess salary recovery retired employee Central Reserve Police Force natural justice

Kartar Singh v. Suresh Chhikara

28 Mar 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1098

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking interim possession relief against his son, holding that settled possession and prior judicial findings preclude such relief without due process.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction possession Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC mandatory injunction

M/S SARADA CONSTRUCTION v. M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

28 Mar 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2022:DHC:1103

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award denying payment for extra work done without written approval and affirmed that no payment is due for work during the Defect Liability Period under the contract.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Defect Liability Period Extra work Contract variations

Radico Khaitan Limited v. Sarao Distillery (OPC) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

28 Mar 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1150

The Delhi High Court granted an ad interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'EVENING MOMENT' for alcoholic beverages, holding it deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark 'MAGIC MOMENTS' due to the dominant feature 'MOMENT'.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Deceptive similarity Dominant feature Ad interim injunction

Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 16(1) New Delhi & Ors.

28 Mar 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1114-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Department to release pending tax refunds with interest to Mother Dairy after confirming no order under Section 241A was passed to withhold them.

tax petition_allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 143(1) Section 143(3) Section 241A

Bhagwan Dass v. Vinita

28 Mar 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1119

The High Court held that a civil court must consider bonafide reasons such as counsel’s illness before ordering arrest of a judgment debtor and remanded the recall application for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI Rule 37 CPC arrest of judgment debtor civil execution proceedings recall of arrest order

Sajjan Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Mar 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:1126-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with interest to a former Indian Air Force officer who served over 10 years, in line with government notifications and prior judgments.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pro-rata pension Indian Air Force qualifying service government notification

Sujit Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

28 Mar 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:1134

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a suicide abetment case, holding that apprehension of witness influence alone does not justify denial of bail when key witness statements are recorded and appropriate conditions can be imposed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC Section 164 Cr.P.C.