Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Ramesh Chander v. Central Board of Direct Taxes
The Delhi High Court held that only the Finance Minister has authority to issue Charge Memos against Group A officers appointed by the President, setting aside an improperly sanctioned Charge Memo.
Springboard Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Finaxar Technology Solutions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed the disputes arising under the Coworking Letter to be referred to arbitration under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre in accordance with the arbitration clause and applicable law.
K.S. Textiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Sheen India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate's order permitting pre-summoning evidence of the bank manager in Section 138 NI Act proceedings, dismissing the petition challenging procedural steps as causing delay.
P D KANUNJNA v. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings against a Group A officer appointed by the President require sanction from the Finance Minister, and quashed a Charge Memo issued without such sanction.
Vistrat Real Estates Private Limited v. Asian Hotels North Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that disputes involving third parties not signatories to the arbitration agreement are for the arbitrator to decide under the doctrine of competence-competence.
M/S Jindal Industries Private Limited v. The Registrar of Trade Mark
Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the refusal of trademark registration for a mark containing the map of India, holding that such use is not prohibited under the Trade Marks Act or Emblems and Names Act when permission from Survey of India exists.
Sumandeep Vidyapeeth v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld MARBISM's denial of permission to start a new Ayurvedic Medical College due to non-compliance with minimum infrastructure and faculty standards, emphasizing the primacy of expert regulatory assessments.
Trikutta Travel Planners v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that ground handling agents have no indefeasible right to continue operations once third-party agencies are duly identified and cleared under the 2018 Regulations, modifying interim orders to permit transition.
Praveen Garg v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
A writ petition challenging unauthorized construction is not maintainable under Article 226 unless the petitioner demonstrates infringement of a fundamental or legal right.
Rajni Kukreja v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ seeking removal of a municipal wall obstructing her shop’s entrance, holding that suppression of material facts and lawful municipal reconstruction disentitled her from relief.
DHL International GmbH v. DLH Express Services Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and declared 'DHL' a well-known trademark, restraining the Defendant from using the deceptively similar mark 'DLH' in courier services.
Manish Gupta v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a complaint filed by a single member Appropriate Authority appointed for part of the State under the PC&PNDT Act is valid, and cognizance taken thereon is lawful, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the complaint and proceedings.
Saga Lifesciences Limited v. Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction protecting the plaintiff's prior user rights in the trademark "ULTRAMOL" against identical use by the defendant on pharmaceutical products, emphasizing the stricter standard for confusion in medicinal trademarks.
State v. Ganesh Chhetri
The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 324 IPC but dismissed the State's appeal to convict under Section 307 IPC due to lack of evidence of intention to kill.
MCCAIN FOODS INDIA PVT LTD v. BHARAT KUMAR THAKOR AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed substitution of the sole arbitrator with a Gujarati-speaking arbitrator and permitted flexible venue arrangements to facilitate arbitration proceedings.
HERO FINCORP LIMITED v. SAMTEL HAL DISPLAY SYSTEMS LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator pursuant to the arbitration clause in the parties' agreement, allowing the petition for reference of disputes to arbitration.
KAMAL ENTERPRISE v. HERO MOTOCORP LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator by consent of parties under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, despite the agreement providing for a panel of three arbitrators.
M/S DRS LOGISTICS (P) LTD & ANR v. GOOGLE INDIA PVT LTD & ORS
Delhi High Court issued notice in contempt proceedings against Google entities for alleged violation of interim injunction restraining use of plaintiffs' trademarks as keywords in online ads, emphasizing need for investigation and removal of infringing ads upon complaint.
Jindal Realty Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for failure to issue a mandatory draft assessment order and show cause notice, emphasizing compliance with natural justice and procedural requirements under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act.
Elcom Innovation Pvt. Ltd. v. Harish Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's applications for interim injunction against misuse of confidential information and for share transfer, holding that confidentiality obligations survive termination but injunctions require specific pleadings and share transfer must follow fair market valuation after plaintiff's default.