Delhi High Court

Shadab v. State

Pacific Spirits Pvt. Ltd. v. Minus30 Private Ltd. & Ors.

North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. IJM Corporation Berhad

Toshiaki Aiba as the Bankruptcy Trustee of the Estate of Vipan Kumar Sharma v. Vipan Kumar Sharma & Anr.

Anil Syal v. Union Bank of India & Ors.

Dr Gaurav Malik v. Anti Corruption Branch, Central Bureau of Investigation

Shweta Thusoo v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Tarun Preet Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

Ahmed Khan & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi

Ranjeet Singh Khatri v. Union of India

Micro Focus Software Solutions India Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

Sandesh v. Delhi Development Authority

Avinash v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi

National Research Development Corporation & Anr. v. M/S SMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd

CCTEB INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-17, DELHI AND ANR.

CCTEB INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-17, DELHI AND ANR.

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3 v. Evalueserve.com Pvt. Ltd.

M/S JBM ECOLIFE MOBILITY PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

The Delhi High Court upheld the automatic disqualification of a bidder due to debarment of its sister concern, emphasizing the binding nature of debarment guidelines and limited judicial interference in tender matters absent arbitrariness or mala fide.

Rathesh Babu Unnikrishnan v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

The High Court correctly refused to quash summons under Section 138 NI Act at the pre-trial stage, emphasizing the limited scope of quashing and the applicability of legal presumptions requiring trial to determine the existence of debt.

Rathesh Babu Unnikrishnan v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings under Section 138 NI Act cannot be quashed at the pre-trial stage on mere factual disputes about debt existence, affirming the need for trial to adjudicate such issues.