Delhi High Court

32,551 judgments

Year:

M/S CONARCH ASSOCIATES v. UNION OF INDIA

28 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1579

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to refer disputes under a contract to arbitration and appointed a sole arbitrator with parties' consent despite respondent's contention of a superseding agreement.

civil appeal_allowed arbitration arbitral tribunal contract agreement supplementary agreement

Interglobe Aviation Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 10 (1)

28 Apr 2022 · Manmohan; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:1656-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for failure to consider the petitioner’s timely filed response after an extension of time was requested.

tax appeal_allowed Section 148 Income Tax Act extension of time notice under Income Tax Act reply to notice

Jeet Nath v. Govind Ram Bafna & Anr.

28 Apr 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain

The Delhi High Court dismissed contempt petitions against respondents for non-compliance with salary payment orders, finding no continuing contempt and noting prior compliance and liquidation proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed contempt of court compliance with court orders salary payment liquidation

MS PROMAX POWER LTD v. MS TAHAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS INDIA PVT LTD

28 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1574

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator and referred the dispute to arbitration with the parties' consent under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil other arbitration arbitration clause appointment of arbitrator Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Kanishk Kumar v. Union of India

28 Apr 2022 · Najmi Waziri; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:1769-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to honor the petitioner’s communicated posting preference for Delhi in SSC CGL 2018 recruitment, recognizing the unfairness of posting him to Bengaluru over juniors.

administrative petition_allowed SSC CGL 2018 Examination posting preference seniority administrative fairness

Babu Ram Sagar v. Lt. Governor of NCT of Delhi and Anr

28 Apr 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:1620-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that acceptance of compensation awarded by the Labour Court bars the terminated employee from seeking reinstatement thereafter.

labor appeal_dismissed Labour Court termination compensation reinstatement

Suchit Gupta v. Gaurav Saini & Anr.

28 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1659

The Delhi High Court set aside a ₹5 lakh cost imposed on a petitioner for granting time to vacate after warrants of possession were issued, holding that such conduct is not abuse of process and advising judicial temperance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant abuse of process eviction order warrants of possession imposition of costs

Prince Facility Management Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Container Corporation of India Limited and Anr.

28 Apr 2022 · VIPIN SANGHI, ACJ; NAVIN CHAWLA, J · 2022:DHC:1676-DB

The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a tender after declaring a bidder L-1 without giving an opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and mala fide, directing the respondent to process the original tender fairly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant tender cancellation natural justice public procurement arbitrariness

Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited v. ACS Cars Private Limited

28 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1575

Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the arbitration agreement and directed compliance with disclosure and fee provisions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitral Tribunal Arbitration agreement Section 12 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Appointment of arbitrator

Rajeev Sadh v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 58(7), Delhi and Anr

28 Apr 2022 · Manmohan; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:1655-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order and remanded the matter for disposal of objections filed under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, reaffirming the mandatory requirement of adjudicating objections before proceeding with assessment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act reassessment notice objections disposal speaking order

TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. V. JETHALAL RAMJI & ORS.

27 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:997

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that underwriters' obligations arise only upon under-subscription after closure of a public issue and that the arbitrator's award was valid despite ex parte proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Underwriting Agreement Fully Convertible Debentures Public Issue SEBI Regulations

TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. DHIRAJ MANILAL THAKAR

27 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1560
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld ex parte arbitral awards against underwriters for failure to subscribe to an undersubscribed public issue, allowing ex post facto extension of arbitration time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act, 1940 Section 28 extension Underwriting Agreement Fully Convertible Debentures

Tomorrowland Limited v. Real Growth Financial Services Ltd.

27 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1555
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld ex parte arbitral awards against underwriters in a public issue dispute, granting ex-post-facto extension of time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, and held that underwriting obligations continued despite early closure due to SEBI-directed withdrawals.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act 1940 Section 28 extension of time Underwriting Agreement Fully Convertible Debentures

TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN LTD

27 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1587
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld ex parte arbitral awards against underwriters for failing to fulfill obligations in an undersubscribed public issue and granted ex-post-facto extension of time for the arbitrator to conclude proceedings under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.

civil appeal_allowed Significant underwriting agreement public issue fully convertible debentures SEBI regulations

M/S RHEIMETALI AIR DEFENCE AG v. ORDANCE FACTORY BOARD AND ORS

27 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1658

The Delhi High Court clarified that the ten-year debarment of the petitioner has expired and allowed withdrawal of the writ petition with a direction that the expired ban shall not prevent participation in government tenders.

administrative petition_allowed debarment blacklisting public procurement Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020

MakeMyTrip India Private Limited v. Booking.com B. V.

27 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1593

The Delhi High Court held that use of a registered trademark as a keyword on Google Ads by a competitor constitutes trademark infringement and granted interim injunction restraining such use within India.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement Google Ads Program keyword bidding passing off

Sh Ishwar Chand v. Union of India

27 Apr 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:1693-DB

The Delhi High Court restored the petitioner’s GSTIN number and granted three months to file GST returns, disposing of the writ petition without adjudicating the claim for damages.

administrative appeal_allowed GSTIN restoration Writ of Mandamus Goods and Services Tax filing GST returns

Tomorrowland Limited v. HDFC Bank Ltd

27 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1562
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court upheld ex parte arbitral awards against underwriters in a public issue dispute, granting ex post facto extension of time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, and rejected challenges based on service and merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act 1940 Section 28 extension of time Underwriting agreement liability Ex parte arbitral award

Dhruv Jyoti Goel v. State & Anr.

27 Apr 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:1531

Anticipatory bail was denied in a cheating case involving disputed property ownership and non-cooperation in investigation where custodial interrogation was necessary to recover the cheated amount.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 420 IPC cheating property dispute

PREMCO RAIL ENGINEERS LIMITED v. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED

27 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1573

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator by consent of parties despite the arbitration agreement stipulating a three-member tribunal for disputes exceeding Rs. 25 lakhs.

other other Arbitration agreement Appointment of arbitrator Sole Arbitrator Three-member Arbitral Tribunal