Delhi High Court

32,551 judgments

Year:

Rachit Malhotra v. One97 Communications Ltd

02 May 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:1814-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified that interlocutory observations do not bar the appellant from arguing that his rights under an ESOP scheme did not lapse, allowing the appeal and vacating the interim order.

civil appeal_allowed ESOP scheme lapse of rights interlocutory order employee stock options

Chhavi v. University of Delhi

01 May 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:4155

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the University of Delhi's restriction limiting the number of papers in the Second Centenary Chance examination, holding that academic policy decisions are within the university's exclusive discretion and not subject to judicial interference absent arbitrariness.

constitutional petition_dismissed academic policy Centenary Chance University of Delhi examination attempts

CLN ENERGY PVT. LTD. v. E ASHWA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED

01 May 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5567
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve disputes arising from a contract containing a valid arbitration clause after the respondent failed to cooperate.

arbitration petition_allowed Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause arbitrability

Mainudeen v. State

29 Apr 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:1660

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for robbery with a deadly weapon and illegal possession of arms, rejecting challenges based on discrepancies in the victim’s statement and lack of documentary proof of ownership.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC deadly weapon

Harinder Singh Chawla v. Rupinder Nayar

29 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1613

The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant's appeal permitting production of the original Will only upon court direction and for forensic examination, balancing the need for evidence with procedural efficiency.

civil appeal_allowed Will production of original Will genuineness of Will forensic examination

Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. CBSE

29 Apr 2022 · Najmi Waziri; Swarana Kanta Sharma Najmi Waziri · 2022:DHC:1908-DB

The High Court dismissed the writ petition for failure to exhaust the statutory appeal remedy and held that procedural orders complied with do not warrant judicial interference.

administrative petition_dismissed statutory remedy disciplinary proceedings Central Administrative Tribunal writ petition

Yogesh Middha v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (South) and Ors

29 Apr 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:1684

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging illegal construction for lack of locus standi and absence of infringement of fundamental or legal rights, emphasizing that only affected parties or municipal authorities can seek such relief under Article 226.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 illegal construction locus standi fundamental rights

M/S MM9 INTERNATIONAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

29 Apr 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1686-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an order and notice under the Income Tax Act for failure to grant the mandatory minimum statutory time to the assessee, emphasizing compliance with procedural safeguards and natural justice.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d)

Amit Gupta v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence Headquarters

29 Apr 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:1661

The Delhi High Court held that reversal of Input Tax Credit in the electronic ledger is a valid mode of satisfying bail deposit conditions under the CGST Act and set aside the cancellation of bail on this ground.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 bail conditions electronic credit ledger

Deepak Madan v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

29 Apr 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:5962

The Delhi High Court granted transit anticipatory bail for 14 days to the petitioner apprehending arrest, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with investigation, clarifying that the order is interim and without prejudice to trial.

criminal bail_granted transit anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. false implication

Pradeep Kumar Chhabra v. Kumud Sharma@ Karun Sharma

29 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1841
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a suit based on title and ownership despite prior withdrawal of an eviction petition without liberty to file a fresh suit, holding the two proceedings involve distinct subject matters under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC withdrawal of suit subject matter Delhi Rent Control Act

Raghav Yadav v. The State NCT of Delhi

29 Apr 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:1705

Bail was denied to the accused in a sexual offence case involving a minor victim, holding that consent of a minor is legally invalid and contradictions in victim’s statements cannot be examined at the bail stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail minor POCSO Act consent

M/S Satish Chand Rajesh Kumar Pvt. Ltd. v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

29 Apr 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:1597

The Delhi High Court held that a contractual debarring order challenged during pending arbitration proceedings is not maintainable as a writ petition and must be adjudicated by the arbitral tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration contractual debarring blacklisting principles of natural justice

Vikash v. Union of India and Anr.

29 Apr 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Asha Menon · 2022:DHC:1678-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging medical boards' findings of unfitness for recruitment, holding that courts will not interfere with medical assessments absent manifest error.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness medical board review petition Order XLVII Rules 1 & 2 CPC

Kaushal Kishor v. Union of India

29 Apr 2022 · Najmi Waziri; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:1757-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to participate in a fresh recruitment exercise despite cancellation of the earlier process, to prevent irreparable prejudice, without conferring any special equity.

administrative petition_allowed recruitment cancellation legitimate expectation select list interim relief

V K Verma v. CBI

29 Apr 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:1609
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the framing of charges against V.K. Verma for criminal conspiracy and corruption in the CWG 2010 licensing case, holding that a prima facie case existed and no patent illegality warranted interference.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge revisional jurisdiction Section 397 CrPC Section 482 CrPC

Sanjay Yadav v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

29 Apr 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:1596

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging retendering of a parking site, holding no concluded contract existed and limited judicial review applies in tender matters under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 tender provisional allotment Letter of Intent

Sunil Gupta v. Indure Pvt. Ltd.

29 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1614

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to refer contractual disputes to arbitration and appointed a sole arbitrator by consent of parties under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_allowed arbitration clause reference to arbitration appointment of arbitrator section 12 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

T. N. Haokip v. Registrar, Co-operative Societies

29 Apr 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:1722-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the three-year residence proof requirement under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 cannot be retrospectively applied to deny membership rights acquired before the Act's enforcement, directing membership clearance of the petitioner without this condition.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 membership clearance proof of residence retrospective application

Pradeep Khandelwal v. Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) & Anr

29 Apr 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:1708-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a Customs order for lack of notice to the petitioner, holding that natural justice requires prior notice and opportunity to participate in proceedings under Section 110(1D) of the Customs Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 110(1D) natural justice notice