Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Tomorrowland Limited v. Madan Bafna & Co.

27 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1551
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld ex-post-facto extension of time for arbitration awards and enforced arbitral awards against underwriters for undersubscription in a public issue, rejecting objections on service and discharge of underwriting obligations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act 1940 Section 28 extension of time Underwriting Agreement SEBI regulations

Lucina Land Development Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1665

The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a class action consumer complaint under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and clarified the scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 vis-à-vis appellate remedies.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 class action complaint Section 12(1)(c) Article 227 Constitution of India

TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. ENSOURCE FINANCE LIMITED

27 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1585
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld ex parte arbitral awards against underwriters in a public issue dispute, granting ex-post-facto extension of time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, and rejecting challenges on service and merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act, 1940 Section 28 extension Underwriting Agreement Fully Convertible Debentures

TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. MANOJ BHARGAVA & CO.

27 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1590
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld ex post facto extension of arbitration time and enforced awards against underwriters liable for undersubscription following SEBI-directed withdrawal in a 1995 public issue.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act 1940 Section 28 extension Underwriting Agreement Fully Convertible Debentures

Pushplata Sharma v. Estate Officer Public Works Department

27 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1657

The Delhi High Court directed the Principal District and Sessions Judge to expeditiously decide the petitioner's stay application against eviction, maintaining interim protection until then, and held that prejudicial remarks without deciding the stay application are improper.

civil other stay application eviction unauthorised occupant interim protection

Bablu Tiwari @ Jata Shankar Tiwari v. State of NCT of Delhi

27 Apr 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:1689

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a de novo trial, holding that the petitioner was not denied a fair opportunity to defend himself and that procedural safeguards under Sections 294 and 313 Cr.P.C. were duly complied with.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 313 Cr.P.C. Section 294 Cr.P.C. ineffective assistance of counsel de novo trial

TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. SHAKTI AND CO.

27 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6120

The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition under Order XXI CPC based on the judgment debtors' counsel's undertaking to pay the remaining decretal amount within two weeks.

civil other execution petition Order XXI CPC decree holder judgment debtors

Jindal Dyechem Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13-1 & Ors.

26 Apr 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1524-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a reassessment order for violating natural justice by issuing a show cause notice requiring compliance before its issuance and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 147 natural justice

Farida Kalia and Others v. Arjun Gupta and Others

26 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1537

The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of bonafide purchasers in a suit for demolition of unauthorized construction, emphasizing natural justice over caveat emptor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order I Rule 10 CPC impleadment natural justice caveat emptor

Subhash Mendiratta v. Suresh Mendiratta

26 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1540

The court refused to allow amendment of the written statement to include a DNA test report already supported by existing pleadings but permitted the report to be taken on record subject to proof.

civil petition_dismissed amendment of written statement DNA test report Article 227 Constitution of India plea already pleaded

Satyendar Kumar Jain v. Central Bureau of Investigation

26 Apr 2022 · Asha Menon · 2022:DHC:1477
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to summon documents not in CBI's custody at the charge framing stage and held that validity of sanction for prosecution is to be considered at the appropriate stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 91 Cr.P.C. framing of charge sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Rohit Kumar v. Union of India & Others

26 Apr 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:1513-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of candidature for Indian Coast Guard recruitment due to non-compliance with prescribed OBC certificate format and mismatched issuance date, rejecting relief for inadvertent error.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant candidature cancellation OBC certificate format document verification recruitment advertisement

Navin Soni v. Munish Soni & Ors.

26 Apr 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:1480

The Delhi High Court held that wilful violation of a consent decree and undertaking to vacate premises constitutes contempt of court, affirming the court's power to punish such disobedience notwithstanding available execution remedies.

civil conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court consent decree undertaking to court wilful disobedience

Kinri Dhir v. Veer Singh

26 Apr 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:1492
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the husband for alleged non-compliance of maintenance orders, holding that no wilful disobedience was established under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

family petition_dismissed Significant civil contempt wilful disobedience maintenance order Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

Jitendra Kumar Garg v. Manju Garg

26 Apr 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:1493

The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court's order directing interim maintenance of Rs. 20,000 per month to the wife, emphasizing the husband's obligation under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and limiting interference under revisional jurisdiction.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 CrPC interim maintenance revisional jurisdiction family court

Kuldeep Singh Dhankar v. Central Bureau of Investigation; Sanjay Gupta v. CBI

26 Apr 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait

The Delhi High Court acquitted two accused of corruption charges due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the necessity of credible evidence for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 13(1)(d) criminal conspiracy benefit of doubt

Sheetal Makol v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

26 Apr 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:1501

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain the trial court from conducting the trial hastily, affirming that the trial must be conducted expeditiously with due regard to fairness and the petitioner’s medical condition.

criminal petition_dismissed expeditious trial medical condition trial court directions blue corner notice

M/S Pradeep Vinod Construction Co. v. Union of India

26 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1509

The Delhi High Court appointed a new Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate disputes afresh after setting aside the earlier arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitral Tribunal Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 12

MR. REEMAR MALHOTRA & ORS. v. BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED

26 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1510

The Delhi High Court appointed an Arbitral Tribunal pursuant to arbitration clauses in loan agreements, allowing the petition for arbitration to proceed.

civil petition_allowed Arbitral Tribunal Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12 Fourth Schedule

Mohd. Aamir v. State and Anr.

26 Apr 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:1532

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a rape case arising from a matrimonial dispute, citing delay in FIR, refusal of medical examination, and absence of injuries as key factors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC rape delay in FIR