Delhi High Court
32,492 judgments
Tomorrowland Limited v. Prasad & Co. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld ex parte arbitral awards against underwriters in a public issue dispute, granting ex post facto extension of arbitration time and rejecting challenges on service and merits.
Tommorrowland Limited v. R.N. Ahuja & Co.
The Delhi High Court upheld ex-post-facto extension of time for arbitral awards and enforced awards against underwriters in a public issue dispute, rejecting challenges on service and merits.
TransAsia Private Capital Limited & Anr. v. Parmanand Agarwal & Ors.
Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction to entertain a summary suit against personal guarantor despite foreign judgment and dismissed defendant's leave to defend application for lack of substantial defence.
Rachin Bansal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for a guarantor accused of criminal conspiracy and fraud in a multi-crore loan default case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation in economic offences.
SANJEEV KHOSLA v. RAJIV KHOSLA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that in a partition suit where the plaintiff pleads possession of a portion of the property, only fixed court fee is payable, setting aside the Registry's demand for additional ad valorem court fee.
Veena Madan v. Income-Tax Officer, Ward 28(2) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the income tax assessment order in writ jurisdiction but allowed the petitioner to file a belated appeal against penalty orders, directing expeditious disposal by the appellate authority.
Pawan Kumar Chotia v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a property owner must provide tenant details to the police before police can verify occupants, dismissing the petition seeking police-initiated tenant verification and protection.
Tomorrowland Limited v. Shakti & Co. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld ex-post-facto extension of time for arbitration awards and enforced ex parte awards against underwriters in a public issue dispute, rejecting objections on service and discharge of liability grounds.
Tommorrowland Limited v. Hemdev Securities (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding underwriters liable for failure to fulfill obligations after a public issue became undersubscribed post-SEBI withdrawal direction, rejecting challenges on service and merits.
TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. VEERHEALTH CARE LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award enforcing underwriting obligations triggered by undersubscription after SEBI-directed withdrawals, rejecting the Defendant’s challenge on service and merits grounds.
Tommorrowland Limited v. Analysis Trade Consultancy LLP
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award enforcing underwriting obligations triggered by undersubscription post-SEBI withdrawal directive, rejecting service and merit-based objections by the Defendant under the Arbitration Act, 1940.
Tomorrowland Limited v. Madan Bafna & Co.
The Delhi High Court upheld ex-post-facto extension of time for arbitration awards and enforced arbitral awards against underwriters for undersubscription in a public issue, rejecting objections on service and discharge of underwriting obligations.
Lucina Land Development Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a class action consumer complaint under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and clarified the scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 vis-Ã -vis appellate remedies.
TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. ENSOURCE FINANCE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld ex parte arbitral awards against underwriters in a public issue dispute, granting ex-post-facto extension of time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, and rejecting challenges on service and merits.
TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. MANOJ BHARGAVA & CO.
The Delhi High Court upheld ex post facto extension of arbitration time and enforced awards against underwriters liable for undersubscription following SEBI-directed withdrawal in a 1995 public issue.
Pushplata Sharma v. Estate Officer Public Works Department
The Delhi High Court directed the Principal District and Sessions Judge to expeditiously decide the petitioner's stay application against eviction, maintaining interim protection until then, and held that prejudicial remarks without deciding the stay application are improper.
Bablu Tiwari @ Jata Shankar Tiwari v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a de novo trial, holding that the petitioner was not denied a fair opportunity to defend himself and that procedural safeguards under Sections 294 and 313 Cr.P.C. were duly complied with.
TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. SHAKTI AND CO.
The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition under Order XXI CPC based on the judgment debtors' counsel's undertaking to pay the remaining decretal amount within two weeks.
Jindal Dyechem Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13-1 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a reassessment order for violating natural justice by issuing a show cause notice requiring compliance before its issuance and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Farida Kalia and Others v. Arjun Gupta and Others
The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of bonafide purchasers in a suit for demolition of unauthorized construction, emphasizing natural justice over caveat emptor.