Delhi High Court
96,004 judgments
Monu @ Seth v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. due to his involvement in further criminal activities during bail and multiple pending cases.
Kamil Kureshiyan v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence in a POCSO and IPC sexual offence case, holding that consent of a minor is immaterial and the serious nature of the offences precludes suspension.
DISHA ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS [PREVENTIVE] & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed the customs authority to treat the writ petition as an application for refund and pass orders for refund of appropriated customs duty along with interest.
Gian Chand v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for applying for an alternative plot under the Scheme of 1961 runs from receipt of original compensation, and applications filed beyond one year are barred, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to rejection on limitation grounds.
PCIT, Delhi-7 v. Ratnagiri Gas and Power Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a business liability to pay bonus under a service agreement accrues in the relevant year and is deductible under the mercantile system of accounting, dismissing the revenue's appeal against the Tribunal's order allowing the expenditure.
Priyanka Rani v. Government of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing appointment of the appellant as Nursing Officer under OBC (NCL) category, holding that caste certificates issued outside a narrowly prescribed period cannot defeat a candidate's substantive reservation rights.
Aryan Management Services Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the income tax reassessment notice and order for failure to share material information with the assessee, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in compliance with natural justice.
Entertainment Network (India) Ltd v. HT Media Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, late filing of documents existing prior to the written statement requires reasonable cause, which was not shown for the Brand Report, and disallowed other late documents to prevent prejudice and delay.
Dheeraj Rastogi v. Dnata International Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a notice invoking arbitration under Section 21 was valid and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) due to the respondent's failure to comply with the arbitration agreement, invalidating the unilateral appointment clause.
Rattan Mehta & Anr. v. Gayatri Shah & Ors.
The High Court held that denial of execution or possession of a document in interrogatories does not justify striking off defense under Order 11 Rule 21 CPC absent willful non-compliance, and set aside the Trial Court's order striking off the defendants' defense.
Jindal Public School v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order rejecting the genuineness of a teacher's resignation and directing reinstatement, emphasizing limited writ jurisdiction and procedural fairness.
Institute of Chartered Tax Advisers of India Ltd. v. The Chartered Institute of Taxation
The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction exists where a defendant promotes or advertises its business, rejected the challenge to jurisdiction at the preliminary stage, and allowed the defendant to raise jurisdictional issues post-trial.
Deepti v. Ravi Shokeen
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer petition under Section 24 CPC to consolidate related family court matters for judicial efficiency and directed exploration of mediation.
Gunjesh Kumar v. Prerna Kumari
The Delhi High Court declined to issue directions for expeditious disposal of a matrimonial petition but expected the Family Court to conduct proceedings as expeditiously as practicable.
Union of India v. M/S Incom Cables (Pvt) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as time-barred, holding that administrative delays and pandemic restrictions do not constitute sufficient cause to condone a 62-day delay beyond the statutory 60-day limitation for appeals under the Arbitration and Commercial Courts Acts.
Vedanshi Pathak v. National Testing Agency & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's plea to appear in JEE Advanced 2022 despite alleged duplication in the shortlist, holding that her merit score was insufficient for eligibility even after correcting the duplication.
Dr Brahma Deo v. Secretary, National Commission for Scheduled Castes
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for failure to implead officials against whom personal allegations of malafides were made, emphasizing the necessity of impleading such persons to enable fair adjudication.
Madan Lal Suryawanshi v. Tara Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the continuation of an ex parte decree due to the petitioner's failure to deposit the court-ordered amount within a reasonable time, affirming the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.
Inspector Raj Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging show cause notices for eviction from government accommodation as premature, emphasizing that such notices do not constitute an adverse order warranting judicial interference under Article 226.
Living Media India Ltd v. Mohammad Sahid
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petitions directing the Labour Court to admit and consider relevant electronic and documentary evidence at the final stage and decide the matter expeditiously.