Delhi High Court
60,196 judgments
Deepti v. Ravi Shokeen
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer petition under Section 24 CPC to consolidate related family court matters for judicial efficiency and directed exploration of mediation.
Gunjesh Kumar v. Prerna Kumari
The Delhi High Court declined to issue directions for expeditious disposal of a matrimonial petition but expected the Family Court to conduct proceedings as expeditiously as practicable.
Union of India v. M/S Incom Cables (Pvt) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as time-barred, holding that administrative delays and pandemic restrictions do not constitute sufficient cause to condone a 62-day delay beyond the statutory 60-day limitation for appeals under the Arbitration and Commercial Courts Acts.
Vedanshi Pathak v. National Testing Agency & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's plea to appear in JEE Advanced 2022 despite alleged duplication in the shortlist, holding that her merit score was insufficient for eligibility even after correcting the duplication.
Dr Brahma Deo v. Secretary, National Commission for Scheduled Castes
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for failure to implead officials against whom personal allegations of malafides were made, emphasizing the necessity of impleading such persons to enable fair adjudication.
Madan Lal Suryawanshi v. Tara Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the continuation of an ex parte decree due to the petitioner's failure to deposit the court-ordered amount within a reasonable time, affirming the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.
Inspector Raj Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging show cause notices for eviction from government accommodation as premature, emphasizing that such notices do not constitute an adverse order warranting judicial interference under Article 226.
Living Media India Ltd v. Mohammad Sahid
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petitions directing the Labour Court to admit and consider relevant electronic and documentary evidence at the final stage and decide the matter expeditiously.
Devasri Bali v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that CBSE's arbitrary change of weightage formula for Class XII Board results violated legitimate expectation and directed recalculation of the petitioner's result as per the original scheme without disturbing the overall revised scheme.
Wing Commander A.S. Oberai & Anr. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust, holding that the FIR prima facie disclosed cognizable offences and investigation must proceed.
Om Prakash v. The Delhi Pinjrapole Society
The Delhi High Court held that trial courts are competent to decide questions of law even if pending before a higher bench and need not adjourn proceedings awaiting such decisions.
Peeyush Kumar Aggarwal v. ITO Ward 19 (1), Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order and notice under the Income Tax Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's reply and improper issuance sequence, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.
CL PRODUCTS INDIA LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5 1 DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that the original Assessing Officer retains jurisdiction during a stay on transfer of jurisdiction and set aside an order for failure to provide the statutory minimum seven days' notice to respond to a show cause notice under the Income Tax Act.
Kiran Mittal v. Kanika Mittal
The Delhi High Court upheld the issuance of summons under the Domestic Violence Act, holding that at the summons stage, courts must apply their mind to material on record without reappreciating evidence.
Vedanshi Pathak v. National Testing Agency & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging duplications in the JEE Main 2022 rank list and refused to allow the petitioner to appear for JEE Advanced 2022, holding that alleged duplications were minimal and did not affect eligibility.
Avdhesh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
Bail was denied to the petitioner in a narcotics case involving commercial quantity where co-accused's disclosure and corroborative evidence invoked stringent NDPS provisions barring bail.
Living Media India Ltd v. Mohammad Sahid
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petitions directing the Labour Court to admit and consider certain electronic and documentary evidence at the final arguments stage without further delay.
Johnson Controls India Private Limited v. DLF Southern Towns Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that at the pre-reference stage, an arbitrator must be appointed unless claims are manifestly time-barred, leaving limitation issues to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.
Curil Tradex Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner, Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the GST registration cancellation order due to non-furnishing of foundational documents and lack of prior notice of inspection, directing reconsideration with adherence to procedural fairness.
Living Media India Ltd v. Mohammad Sahid
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to place certain electronic and documentary evidence on record at the final arguments stage, setting aside the Labour Court's order dismissing the same.