Delhi High Court
67,052 judgments
M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. v. The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Inv.)-4(3), New Delhi & Ors.
Delhi High Court modified interim order restricting foreign payments by Huawei India, allowing limited remittances subject to security deposits and expeditious assessment, balancing business interests and revenue protection.
Jeevesh Sabharwal v. Aruna Gupta & Anr.
The High Court held that a complainant under Section 138 NI Act who is unable to attend court due to infirmity must be examined through a Commission, and a Special Power of Attorney holder can lead evidence only if specifically authorized and possessing personal knowledge.
Pandit Digamber Sharma v. Shri Ram Prakash Anand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that criminal proceedings under Section 340 Cr.P.C. cannot be initiated for forgery committed before a document is produced in court, dismissing the petition challenging rejection of such proceedings.
Sunita Wilson v. St. Pauls Diocesan School and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed payment of withheld terminal benefits and arrears with interest to a retired teacher, mandating the Directorate of Education to determine the correct dues after hearing both parties.
PhonePe Private Limited v. EZY Services & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that defendants may file additional documents created after filing the written statement without showing reasonable cause for non-disclosure, while documents in possession earlier require such cause, and allowed confidential contracts to be filed in sealed cover in a trademark infringement suit.
Antrix Corporation Ltd. v. Devas Multimedia Private Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award holding that Antrix's termination of the satellite lease contract with Devas was justified due to a sovereign governmental decision constituting Force Majeure, and emphasized proper interpretation of contract terms and admissibility of evidence.
MS M K Engineers v. Munna Prasad
The Delhi High Court disposed of connected writ petitions following a court-mediated settlement, directing release of deposited funds to the petitioner-management for payment to workmen as agreed.
MS M K Engineers v. Munna Prasad
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions following an amicable settlement through court mediation, directing release of deposited funds to the petitioner-management for payment to workmen.
Maj. Yugan Prakash (Retd.) v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the priority scheme for PG seats under AFMS, holding that allocation priorities are policy decisions not subject to judicial interference.
Bolt Technology OU v. Ujoy Technology Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act is mandatory except where urgent interim relief is sought, and allowed the Plaintiff's suit for trademark infringement without prior mediation due to the urgent nature of relief and Defendants' refusal to mediate.
Satyam & Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a permanent injunction flowing from a declaratory decree in a suit involving disputed title is a consequential relief requiring ad valorem court fees on the full value of the property.
Harinder Kumar v. Girish Peshoria
The Delhi High Court upheld the execution of a consent decree ordering payment and possession, dismissing objections based on delayed deed registration and fraudulent property transfer.
Dr. Sunil Yadav v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the respondent to consider the petitioner for appointment with age relaxation, holding that exclusion based on a false complaint and uninitiated disciplinary proceedings was unjustified.
Delhi International Airport Limited v. Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Appeals Delhi II
The Delhi High Court held that the CESTAT cannot dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution without hearing the appellant and restored the appeal for adjudication on merits after setting aside dismissal orders passed without proper notice.
Punjab and Sind Bank v. New Found Land Enterprises Pvt Ltd
The High Court set aside an ex-parte order closing the petitioner's evidence due to late appearance and granted a final opportunity to complete evidence after receipt of police records.
Rakesh Kumar v. Saraswati Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's closure of the defendant's right to cross-examine the senior citizen plaintiff after repeated adjournments, dismissing the petition under Article 227 for lack of merit.
Gurjit Singh Talwar v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal of sine die adjournment of an appeal, holding that pendency of related regularisation proceedings does not mandate adjournment and the learned ADJ’s discretionary order was not liable to interference under Article 227.
Monu @ Seth v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. due to his involvement in further criminal activities during bail and multiple pending cases.
Kamil Kureshiyan v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence in a POCSO and IPC sexual offence case, holding that consent of a minor is immaterial and the serious nature of the offences precludes suspension.
DISHA ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS [PREVENTIVE] & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed the customs authority to treat the writ petition as an application for refund and pass orders for refund of appropriated customs duty along with interest.