Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
G P Chobey v. Ishwar Industries Ltd; K.K Golyan v. Ishwar Industries Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals seeking clarification on whether monetary amounts imposed in a contempt order were fines or costs, stayed the original order, and directed the Single Judge to clarify the nature and consequences of the payments.
Nagesh Trading Co. v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-47-1, Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices issued under Section 148A(b) post-expiry of limitation where an earlier valid notice under unamended Section 148 was served, clarifying the limited applicability of Supreme Court directions in Ashish Agarwal.
SM GD Santosh Kumar and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the pending pension and seniority claims of petitioner number 2 within a stipulated time, affirming the right to challenge any adverse decision.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. LATE ASHOK KUMAR SINGH
The Delhi High Court held that compassionate allowance under Rule 41 CCS Pension Rules is discretionary and may be granted retrospectively from the date of representation but not necessarily from dismissal, modifying the Tribunal's order accordingly.
Rajpal Singh v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging the rejection of a police constable's representation against dismissal, holding that no new material or error apparent on record justified review under limited grounds.
Vipin Garg v. Rajesh Garg
The High Court allowed the petitioners to move an application for condonation of delay after their written statement was refused record for lack of extension application, emphasizing procedural fairness under Article 227 CPC jurisdiction.
Karuna Nidhan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide the petitioner's pending service benefit claims within three months, disposing of the writ petition without adjudicating the substantive issues.
Kush Raj Bhatia v. M/S DLF Power and Services Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of arbitrator, holding that the courts at Gurgaon and Chandigarh have exclusive jurisdiction over disputes under the lease deed, clarifying the distinction between seat and venue of arbitration.
V. K. Malhotra v. Union Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of a time-barred charge sheet and pension withholding order against a retired bank officer, remanding the remaining disciplinary matter for fresh consideration while affirming the necessity of criminal conviction for gratuity forfeiture.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Bengaluru-5 v. M/S NTT DATA GLOBAL DELIVERY SERVICES LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision allowing deduction of incidental interest income under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Triumphant Institute of Management Education Pvt. Ltd. v. Times Coaching Centre
The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff's dominant trademark feature 'T.I.M.E.' is deceptively similar to the Defendant's 'TIMES' marks, granting injunction against infringement and passing off.
Rajan Sethi v. Sajan Sethi
The Delhi High Court upheld that the petitioner must construct an additional door to access his share of the second floor as per a final partition decree and cannot use any existing door, reaffirming the limited jurisdiction of executing courts.
S.K. Saraswat & Ors. v. Chief Secretary, Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees entitled under MACPS must receive upgraded pay with arrears and interest from the scheme's notified implementation date or their eligibility date, setting aside the Tribunal's order limiting retrospective payment.
Vijay Mahajan v. Parvesh Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld that a commercial suit seeking urgent interim relief under CPC is exempt from mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing the petitioner's challenge under Article 227.
Management of CPWD v. SH, Narayan Singh
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing an appeal under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and remanded the matter to the Appellate Authority for adjudication on merits, staying recovery proceedings meanwhile.
Coronation Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a sole arbitrator unilaterally appointed in violation of Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is de jure ineligible, mandating termination of his mandate and appointment of a substitute arbitrator under Section 14(1).
Coronation Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a Sole Arbitrator appointed unilaterally in violation of Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is de jure disqualified, terminated his mandate under Section 14, and appointed a substitute Arbitrator to continue the proceedings.
Charan Singh & Anr. v. Shri Phool Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 to set aside the closure of evidence order after the petitioner complied with court-imposed costs, granting one final opportunity to complete evidence.
Rajesh Kathpal v. M/S Thukral Steel Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's order rejecting the petitioner's application to strike off the respondent's written statement filed within the extended limitation period granted due to the COVID-19 pandemic.