Delhi High Court

95,726 judgments

Year:

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Raj Kumari Devi & Ors.

11 Oct 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4485
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay enhanced compensation to motor accident victims despite the driver lacking a valid license, allowing recovery from the insured for breach of policy conditions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Insurance liability Breach of policy conditions Valid driving license

M/S GRAPHISADS PRIVATE LIMITED v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIAL CORPORATION

11 Oct 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:4463-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a blacklisting order lacking an end date and directed payment of dues with interest at 8% per annum, facilitating recall of the blacklisting upon settlement.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant blacklisting order end date interest rate surcharge

Saddam v. Union of India

11 Oct 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4474
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay and set aside the Railway Claims Tribunal's finding that the appellant was not a bonafide passenger, remanding the matter for compensation determination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay bonafide passenger railway accident Railway Claims Tribunal

H.R. Choudhury v. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.

11 Oct 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4321
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary demotion of a Power Grid officer, holding that the inquiry was fair, findings were supported by evidence, and the Court will not reappreciate evidence under Article 226 absent perversity or illegality.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry Article 226 natural justice Power Grid Rules

Shri Yash Pal Singh v. The Secretary (Land & Building Department)

11 Oct 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4337

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of an alternative plot under the 1961 Scheme, holding that ownership of any residential property disqualifies entitlement under the Scheme.

property petition_dismissed Significant alternative plot allotment Scheme of 1961 land acquisition eligibility criteria

UFLIX INDUSTRIES v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

10 Oct 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:4302-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court directed lifting of a provisional attachment under the CGST Act after the petitioner reversed the alleged fraudulent ITC and the revenue failed to act within the statutory timeframe.

tax appeal_allowed Significant provisional attachment Section 83 CGST Act input tax credit fraudulent ITC

Zuleikha Karnik v. Avtar Kaur

10 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4141-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of a 1132-day delay in filing an appeal, holding that the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay limitation period appeal execution petition

M/S WELSPUN ENTERPRISES LTD. v. M/S NCC LTD.

10 Oct 2022 · Vibhu Bahkru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4127-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for invoking arbitration commences only after exhaustion and failure of the agreed pre-arbitration dispute resolution process, dismissing Welspun's appeal against the arbitral award rejecting its claims as time-barred.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration limitation period pre-arbitration dispute resolution cause of action

Aroon Aviation Services Pvt Ltd v. Union of India

10 Oct 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:4152

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application to refer the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, holding that disputes involving both arbitrable and non-arbitrable matters cannot be partially referred to arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act excepted matters arbitrability bifurcation of suit

Som Prakash v. State and Anr.

10 Oct 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4123

The Delhi High Court held that an application to revoke Letters of Administration is barred by a three-year limitation period from the date of grant under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and set aside the revocation order accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Letters of Administration Probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Limitation Act, 1963

Sneha v. Union of India and Ors.

10 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:4208
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking admission to IIT Indore due to unsubstantiated technical glitch claims and invalid OBC candidature under JoSAA rules.

administrative petition_dismissed JoSAA seat acceptance fee technical glitch OBC certificate

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Satkar Infrastructure (P) Ltd.

10 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4149-DB

The High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, holding that concurrent factual findings on genuineness of share capital cannot be disturbed absent a substantial question of law.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act unexplained share capital share premium concurrent findings of fact

Som Prakash v. State and Anr.

10 Oct 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4124

The Delhi High Court held that the revocation of Letters of Administration granted under a Will is barred by a three-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and set aside the revocation order on this ground.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Letters of Administration Probate Indian Succession Act Limitation Act Article 137

Kirori Mal College v. Kusum Lata

10 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4109-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed release of voluntarily deposited monetary benefits with interest to a disabled employee and clarified procedures for resolving disputes on additional arrears following retrospective confirmation of permanent appointment.

labor petition_allowed Significant monetary benefits voluntary deposit Persons with Disability Act, 1995 seniority

Unnati Goyal v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr.

10 Oct 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4245

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging CBSE’s rejection of pro rata marks relief under its Scheme, holding the petitioner’s illness did not qualify as serious illness requiring hospitalization and procedural requirements were not met.

constitutional petition_dismissed Article 226 Article 14 Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation CBSE Scheme 2022

Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 19(1) Delhi & Ors.

10 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4238-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening notice and order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2013-14 due to non-consideration of assessee’s submissions and remanded the matter for fresh decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(d) reopening of assessment

Mona Mamtani v. Mohinder Kaur Bedi

10 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4179

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an order directing the petitioner to deposit arrears of rent under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC and upheld the interim relief permitting continued possession on payment of rent.

civil petition_dismissed Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC deposit of money in court lease agreement arrears of rent

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. Moviesflix.net & Ors.

10 Oct 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:4176 CS(COMM) 457/2019
Cites 2 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and blocking orders against rogue websites illegally streaming Warner Bros.' copyrighted films, allowing summary judgment due to undisputed infringement.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement rogue websites cinematograph films permanent injunction

WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC v. HTTPS://XMOVIES08.RU & ORS

10 Oct 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:4175
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions against rogue websites illegally streaming Warner Bros.' copyrighted films, directing ISPs and government departments to block access and allowing impleadment of mirror sites to prevent copyright infringement.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement rogue websites permanent injunction summary judgment

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc v. HTTPS://WW2.MOVIERULZFREE.COM & Ors.

10 Oct 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:4174 CS (COMM) 407/2019
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions against multiple rogue websites illegally streaming plaintiff's copyrighted films, directing ISPs and government authorities to block access and allowing dynamic impleadment of mirror sites.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement rogue websites summary judgment permanent injunction