Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
M/S Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking enforcement of a tender agreement, holding that conditional acceptance does not create a binding contract and courts must exercise restraint in reviewing administrative tender decisions involving policy and technical matters.
M/S Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking enforcement of a tender agreement, holding that conditional acceptance with additional terms does not form a valid contract and courts must exercise restraint in reviewing administrative tender decisions.
Dinesh Kumar @ Khali v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions of three appellants for murder based on a reliable dying declaration and common intention under Section 34 IPC, dismissing challenges to witness credibility and ballistic evidence.
Allergan Inc and Anr. v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trade Marks and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Section 36E(5) of the Trade Marks Act does not permit deeming of protection for international registrations where timely opposition has been filed, setting aside Registrar orders abating oppositions due to communication failures.
Dhani Loans and Services Limited & Anr. v. WWW.DHANIFINANCE.COM & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against a defendant for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off involving deceptively similar marks and domain name, awarding summary judgment due to defendant's non-appearance.
Rajesh Kathpal v. M/S Shubh Steel
The Delhi High Court held that the written statement filed within the Supreme Court's COVID-19 extension of limitation period is timely and refused to strike it off, dismissing the petition under Article 227.
Salim v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for armed robbery and murder, holding that use of deadly weapons by each offender attracts Section 397 IPC individually and firing causing death during escape amounts to murder under Section 302 IPC.
Sunil Kumar Saini v. The District and Sessions Judge
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of court staff for forging judicial orders, affirming that departmental inquiries require proof on preponderance of probabilities and that absence of handwriting expert opinion does not vitiate disciplinary findings.
Coronation Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the unilateral appointment of a Sole Arbitrator violating Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 results in de jure disqualification, mandating termination of his mandate and appointment of a substitute Arbitrator.
Coronation Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a Sole Arbitrator unilaterally appointed in violation of Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is de jure disqualified, mandating termination of his mandate and appointment of a substitute Arbitrator under Section 14.
Saiyid Sirajul Hasan v. Syed Murtaza Ali Khan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's belated amendment application to enhance suit valuation and alter shares, holding it was not necessary for real controversy determination and motivated to retain jurisdiction, and ordered transfer of the suit to the competent District Court.
VAG Educational Services v. Aakash Educational Services Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that once arbitral proceedings are terminated on claimant's withdrawal, the arbitrator's mandate ends and he cannot recall the termination order or revive the proceedings.
Manish Gupta v. Ameeka Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld IRDA regulations restricting premature release of insurance proceeds, allowed deposit of disputed amounts with the Court, and directed supervised virtual interaction between the appellant and children residing abroad.
Allergan Inc and Anr. v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trade Marks and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the deeming provision under Section 36E(5) of the Trade Marks Act applies only where no opposition is filed, and the Registrar's failure to communicate opposition to WIPO cannot abate opposition or grant protection to an international registration.
Ashish Windwani v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted suspension of sentence and bail to the appellant convicted under Section 376(2)(n) IPC, holding that patent infirmities in conviction justified bail pending appeal without re-assessing evidence.
Prem Kumar Shrivastava v. Meenu Verma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a licensee challenging ownership and possession rights of the registered owner under the Benami Transactions Act, upholding the decree for mandatory injunction and recovery of license fee arrears.
Nanoo v. Vikas Sharma & Ors.
The High Court held that Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act does not bar impleadment of legal representatives of a deceased plaintiff under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC, and dismissed the petition challenging such impleadment.
Sandeep Kumar Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to an ex-IAF personnel discharged on obtaining a civil post, in line with established legal precedents.
Rajbir Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondents to provide the de novo inquiry record and outcome, emphasizing procedural completeness before challenging disciplinary actions.
Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension to the petitioner for his past service in the Indian Air Force in line with applicable rules and judicial precedents.