Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Jasbeer Singh v. Kishori Mahey & Ors.

12 Oct 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4319
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of an employees’ compensation claim for lack of reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial orders under the Employees’ Compensation Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 compensation claim injury arising out of employment dismissal without reasons

Vishal Kaushik v. Jyoti Gupta

12 Oct 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · RFA(OS) 75/2018

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a compromise decree, holding that no appeal lies against a consent decree and that delay and non-payment of court fees warranted dismissal.

civil appeal_dismissed compromise decree appeal barred Section 96(3) CPC delay in filing appeal

Naman Madan v. DCIT Central Circle 30 Delhi & Anr.

12 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4346-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging income tax notices and held that statutory remedies must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153C Section 143(2) writ petition

Raj K P Sinha v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

12 Oct 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:4688

Bail was denied to the accused director of an unrecognised organisation charged with cheating multiple victims through fraudulent job offers and fake appointment letters, due to the seriousness of the offence and risk of evidence tampering.

criminal petition_dismissed bail cheating criminal breach of trust Section 406 IPC

Siddhant Tomar v. State

12 Oct 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:4322

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a dowry death case, holding that the factual matrix did not prima facie establish cruelty soon before death and balancing the right to liberty against trial considerations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail dowry death Section 304-B IPC contradictions in FIR

New Balance Athletics Inc. v. New Balance Immigration Private Limited

12 Oct 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4355

Delhi High Court granted temporary injunction restraining Defendant from using Plaintiff's registered trademarks NEW BALANCE and NB, holding such use amounts to infringement and passing off despite dissimilar services.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off temporary injunction Trade Marks Act 1999

Sombir v. Staff Selection Commission

12 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4307-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation and debarment of a candidate by SSC, holding that forensic evidence did not conclusively prove malpractice during the examination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant cancellation of candidature debarment Staff Selection Commission forensic handwriting verification

Kiran Kumar Anand v. Aakanksha Anand & Ors.

12 Oct 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:4318
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that interim maintenance under the DV Act cannot be extended to a father-in-law as Karta of HUF without specific pleadings or proof, modifying the appellate order accordingly.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 interim maintenance Hindu Undivided Family Karta liability

Vijender Tanwar v. Girwar LR and Another

12 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4496

The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of an impleadment application by one person does not bind a non-party claiming through him, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with reasons.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 1 Rule 10 CPC impleadment judicial order binding effect non-party to order

Preeti Katiyar v. Union of India and Ors.

11 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4279-DB

The Delhi High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to seek advancement of the Tribunal hearing and directed sympathetic consideration of interim relief and leave applications, disposing of the writ petition with procedural directions.

administrative petition_allowed advancement of hearing date interim relief Tribunal procedure leave application

Omega Finvest LLP v. Direct News Private Limited

11 Oct 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:4243
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause in the expired Second Rent Agreement survives and governs disputes notwithstanding subsequent settlement agreements, and appointed a sole arbitrator accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition Arbitration clause Expiry of contract

MS. BYGGING INDIA LIMITED v. MS BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD

11 Oct 2022 · V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. · 2022:DHC:4242

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator due to lack of jurisdiction, holding that the arbitration seat was Noida as per the contract, and only courts at that seat could entertain such petitions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration clause jurisdiction venue vs seat Section 11(6) Arbitration Act

M/S Cell Page Communication v. Vijay Shankar Pandey

11 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4241
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that warrants of arrest in execution of a money decree cannot be issued without prior show cause notice as mandated by Section 51 and Order XXI Rules 37 and 40 CPC, and quashed the warrants issued without following this procedure.

civil petition_allowed Significant execution of decree money decree warrant of arrest Section 51 CPC

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 v. IFFCO Ltd.

11 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4191-DB

The Delhi High Court held that expenditure incurred in relation to dividend income exempt under the India-Oman DTAA cannot be disallowed under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A Income Tax Act Dividend income Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement Tax sparing credit

The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Central -1 v. R.J. Corp. Ltd.

11 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4190-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that additions under Section 153A cannot be made in respect of concluded assessments without incriminating material found during search, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act incriminating material completed assessment search and seizure

Dr. Rashi Satyanarayan Soni & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:4146
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Ministry of Health's policy that FCPS qualifications from CPS Mumbai are recognized but not equivalent to MD/MS degrees, dismissing petitions challenging exclusion from DNB examinations.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant FCPS courses MD/MS equivalence Diplomate of National Board National Board of Examinations

Sunshine Teahouse Pvt. Ltd. v. MTRM Global Pvt. Ltd.

11 Oct 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:4185

The Delhi High Court approved a consent settlement requiring the Defendant to cease use of the infringing mark 'CHAIOPS' and adopt 'ChaiApps' within specified timelines, thereby resolving the trademark dispute with the Plaintiff 'CHAAYOS'.

civil settled trademark infringement permanent injunction trade name amicable settlement

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-2 v. M/S Boeing India Pvt. Ltd.

11 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4188-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal upholding the ITAT's deletion of transfer pricing adjustments on receivables and disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia), while leaving open the question on the validity of a draft order issued in the name of a non-existent company.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 144C(1) Section 40(a)(ia) Section 195

M/S JBM Ecolife Mobility Private Limited v. Union of India

11 Oct 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:4155-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that debarment of JBM Electric under the PLI Scheme without proper notice and hearing was unjustified, quashed the debarment, and restored JBM Ecolife's eligibility to participate in tenders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant debarment blacklisting Production Linked Incentive Scheme Global Group Revenue

Vikrant Kapila & Anr. v. Pankaja Panda & Ors.

11 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4153-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the absolute bequest of property shares to the four children under the Will, declaring subsequent restrictive clauses void and dismissing the appeal challenging the partition and sale of the property.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Will interpretation absolute bequest restrictive clause Indian Succession Act, 1925