Delhi High Court

95,726 judgments

Year:

Garg Builders v. Hindustan Prefab Limited & Anr.

10 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6801
Cites 4 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that failure of a designated authority to appoint an arbitrator does not preclude court appointment under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, and pre-arbitral protocols must be exhausted before invoking arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Pre-arbitral protocol Appointment of arbitrator

Pawan Kumar Kakaria v. Anil Kumar Rai

07 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4128

The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with the trial court's order seeking clarifications and expunged adverse remarks against counsel, emphasizing judicial restraint and respect in court proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Order XII Rule 8 CPC adverse remarks against counsel judicial restraint

Ashok Kumar v. Addl.C.P. Delhi & Ors.

07 Oct 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Yashwant Varma · 2022:DHC:4075-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a police employee in disciplinary proceedings, holding non-supply of preliminary enquiry report does not vitiate proceedings if it was not relied upon and the employee admitted guilt.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant preliminary enquiry report Rule 15(3) Delhi Police Rules departmental enquiry disciplinary proceedings

Panchi @Panchpal v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

07 Oct 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4069-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence despite inconsistencies and absence of direct recovery of the weapon from the appellant.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Eyewitness testimony Section 27 Indian Evidence Act Homicidal death

Boutique International Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 4 (2)

07 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4118-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment notice and order under Sections 148 and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for lack of specific details and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after allowing the petitioner to respond to additional information.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(d) reassessment proceedings

HC/M Kushalveer Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

07 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4138-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to decide the petitioner's pending representation within a stipulated time, refusing to quash the impugned administrative orders at this stage.

administrative other writ petition representation quashing administrative orders

IJM Gayatri JV v. National Highways Authority of India

07 Oct 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4080-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting loss of profits and compound interest, clarifying the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and distinguishing claims for overheads from loss of profits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 loss of profits overhead expenses

The District & Sessions Judge (HQS) & Anr. v. Narender Kumar; The District & Sessions Judge (HQS) & Anr. v. Neeraj Kumar Sangwan

07 Oct 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:4076-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that judicial review permits correction of calculation errors in examination marks but not re-evaluation of answer sheets, dismissing review petitions challenging the impugned judgment that set aside the re-evaluation of typing test marks.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review re-evaluation re-calculation of marks typing test

M-Power Energy India (P) Ltd & Anr. v. Sumana Mazumdar

07 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4137
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the continuation of a wrongful termination suit by the deceased plaintiff's legal heir, holding that the right to sue survives death to the extent the claim is contractual, and refused to interfere under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 3(1) CPC right to sue survival actio personalis moritur cum persona Section 306 Indian Succession Act

SNG Developers Limited v. Vardhman Buildtech Private Limited

07 Oct 2022 · Vibhu Bahkru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4077-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's admission of an insufficiently stamped Agreement to Sell, holding that belated objections to stamping are barred once the document is admitted in evidence under agreed procedural rules.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Section 36 Indian Stamp Act admission of documents in evidence

Amit Kumar v. Union of India

07 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4144-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation regarding his transfer, directing respondents to consider it promptly and maintain status quo meanwhile.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition transfer order posting extension status quo

Jeetu Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.

07 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4140-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding rejection of his medical examination application within a stipulated time, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative other writ petition medical examination application Assam Rifle Examination representation

Sachin Hindurao Waze v. Union of India & Ors.

07 Oct 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4070-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a UAPA sanction order for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the Bombay High Court was the appropriate forum considering the principle of forum conveniens and locus of cause of action.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction forum conveniens Unlawful Activities Prevention Act Section 45(1) UAPA

Sh. Prithvi Singh and Anr v. Union of India

07 Oct 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4125
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a passenger traveling beyond the destination with a valid ticket remains bonafide and that death by falling from a train constitutes an untoward incident under the Railways Act, entitling compensation under strict liability provisions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant bonafide passenger Railways Act 1989 Section 124A untoward incident

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. MRS CHITRA SINGH

07 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4126-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Tribunal erred in relaxing the eligibility criteria prescribed in the recruitment advertisement, emphasizing that courts cannot override employer-prescribed conditions absent express power of relaxation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant eligibility criteria relaxation of qualifications recruitment advertisement appointing authority discretion

M/S GOPAL LIFESCIENCES (UNIT-II) v. EMPLOYEE STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ORS.

07 Oct 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Yashwant Varma · 1 ESIC 2022:DHC:4074

The Delhi High Court upheld ESIC's rejection of a bidder's tender for failure to provide complete technical details, ruling that material non-compliance cannot be condoned as a minor irregularity under procurement rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender evaluation technical eligibility minor irregularity Manual for Procurement of Goods 2017

DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED v. ALPHA SCIENCES PTE LIMITED

07 Oct 2022 · Prateek Jalan · 2022:DHC:4156

The Delhi High Court granted a mandatory injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act directing the respondent to issue a no-objection certificate for appointment of a new distributor after expiry of the distributorship agreement, emphasizing the court's wide power to grant interim relief pending arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act mandatory injunction no-objection certificate interim relief

Shubham Verma v. Union of India and Others

07 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4139-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks and restrained coercive action pending such decision.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition service conditions military training ante-date seniority

BASF SE v. GSP CROP SCIENCE PRIVATE LIMITED

07 Oct 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:4117

The Delhi High Court decreed a patent infringement suit restraining the defendant from commercially launching a fungicide product covered by the plaintiff's patent until expiry or invalidity, based on the defendant's undertaking.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patent IN 271338 Crystalline Complex Thiophanate Methyl Pyraclostrobin

Peps Industries Private Limited v. Kurlon Limited

07 Oct 2022 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4095-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed PEPS's appeal, holding that KURLON was estopped from challenging the descriptiveness of the registered trademark 'NO TURN' and granted interim injunction restraining KURLON from using the mark.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Interim injunction Descriptive mark Estoppel