Delhi High Court

95,726 judgments

Year:

Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. The Senior Examiner of Trade Marks Delhi

14 Oct 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4338

Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the trademark registration refusal of 'ENTREPRENEUR' for fresh consideration, emphasizing distinctness of goods and consent letters under Section 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 11(1) likelihood of confusion trademark registration

Tabish Khan & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi

14 Oct 2022 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:4335

The High Court held that a Magistrate must apply judicial mind and assign reasons when summoning accused placed in column no.12 of the charge-sheet, setting aside the orders summoning petitioners without such reasons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Cognizance Application of judicial mind Charge-sheet columns

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4327

The Delhi High Court remanded a pay arrears and regularization dispute to the Labour Court for fresh adjudication after finding a senior officer's statement unauthorized and stayed recovery certificates pending the decision.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33-C(2) regularization pay arrears

Vipin Kumar Tyagi v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4315-DB

The Delhi High Court directed sympathetic consideration of the petitioner's request for a transfer closer to his residence due to personal hardship, while dismissing interim protection against the transfer order.

administrative appeal_dismissed transfer order interim protection sympathetic consideration service tenure

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Abhishek Verma & Anr.

14 Oct 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:4681

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial Court’s order relaxing bail conditions allowing accused to travel within India subject to informing the Court, dismissing the CBI’s revision petition challenging the modification.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail conditions modification of bail revision petition interlocutory order

M/S AGL LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (NFAC), DELHI AND ANR

14 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4328-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authorities to dispose of the petitioner's appeal within six months after finding non-compliance with a prior court order and rejecting a cryptic stay order.

tax petition_allowed stay application Income Tax appeal compliance with court order reasoned order

M/S SPSS MEDILINE v. Union of India & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4407

The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of the petitioner's GeM account pending disposal of the appeal, emphasizing the requirement of natural justice and due process in administrative actions.

administrative appeal_allowed GeM Incident Management Policy benami identity account suspension natural justice

Johney Reberio v. Union of India & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:4345

The Delhi High Court upheld the bar on legal representation before the Internal Complaints Committee under Rule 7(6) of the Sexual Harassment Rules, dismissing the petition seeking representation by a person of legal background during the enquiry.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act, 2013 Rule 7(6) Sexual Harassment Rules 2013 legal representation Internal Complaints Committee

Rajesh Kumar v. CBI

14 Oct 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:4687

Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges against a junior accountant for knowingly submitting a false stock statement to defraud a bank, rejecting his plea for discharge.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal conspiracy cheating false stock statement prima facie evidence

Seal For Life Industries US LLC v. The Registrar of Trade Marks

14 Oct 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4437

Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remitted the trademark 'ANODEFLEX' registration refusal for fresh consideration, holding that descriptiveness alone cannot bar registration if the mark has acquired distinctiveness through use.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 9(1)(b) descriptive mark acquired distinctiveness

M/S Young Men S Tennis Club v. NDMC

14 Oct 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4416

The Delhi High Court clarified that under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971, appeals must be heard by the District Judge or a judicial officer with at least ten years standing in the district, not necessarily as an Additional District Judge, and accordingly reassigned the appeals for proper disposal.

civil other Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 Section 9 Appeal Appellate Officer

M/S RADIANT HOTELS PRIVATE LTD v. UDAY PILANI

14 Oct 2022 · C. HARI SHANKAR · 2022:DHC:4403
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that its jurisdiction under Article 227 is supervisory and limited, refusing to interfere with the NCDRC order and directing the petitioner to seek reconsideration of the jurisdictional issue before the NCDRC.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission jurisdictional challenge

Azure Hospitality Private Limited v. Phonographic Performance Limited

14 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2561-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld an injunction restraining Azure Hospitality from using PPL's copyrighted sound recordings without license, affirming that copyright assignees can independently grant licenses notwithstanding the requirement of registration as a copyright society under Section 33.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Copyright Act, 1957 Section 18 assignment Section 30 license Section 33 copyright society

State Bank of India v. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd

14 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2025:DHC:8450
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Delhi High Court dismissed SBI's application to recall its order disposing of an appeal based on a Settlement Agreement, holding that the restoration of Maxwell Securities Pvt Ltd. by the NCLT and subsequent Board Resolution validated the agreement and indemnity bond.

civil petition_dismissed Settlement Agreement Board Resolution Restoration of company Section 252(3) Companies Act

Chattan Dabas v. State (NCT of Delhi)

14 Oct 2022 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10056
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail application in a murder case, holding that prima facie evidence and gravity of offence outweigh the petitioner's prolonged custody and hostile witnesses at the bail stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail murder circumstantial evidence CCTV footage

State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Pappu

13 Oct 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4227-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the statutory minimum sentence under Section 10 of the POCSO Act must be imposed, set aside the trial court's probation order, and enhanced the sentence to five years rigorous imprisonment with compensation to the victim.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act Section 10 POCSO minimum sentence probation

Rakhi v. Staff Selection Commission

13 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4276-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an agreed hospital to conclusively determine the petitioner's medical fitness for recruitment, making the report final and binding.

administrative other medical examination recruitment medical fitness distance vision

PCIT, DELHI-7 v. RATNAGIRI GAS AND POWER PVT. LTD.

13 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4282-DB

The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against ITAT's order on interest capitalization disallowance, holding that concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed without a substantial question of law.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Appeal Section 36(1)(iii) Income Tax Act capitalization of interest concurrent findings of fact

Ex ASI/GD Nikaji Sopan Raghunath v. Union of India

13 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4278-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation for APAR upgradation within four weeks, ensuring timely administrative action without adjudicating on the merits.

administrative other writ of mandamus Annual Performance Appraisal Report APAR upgradation Modified Assured Career Progression

Amiteshwar Singh v. Kamal Nain & Anr

13 Oct 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:4213

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint alleging HUF ownership of property cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely on defendant's contentions and that the question of benami property exception requires trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 Hindu Undivided Family Karta