Delhi High Court

60,196 judgments

Year:

Dr. Sarbesh Bhattacharjee v. State NCT of Delhi

14 Oct 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:4281

The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs against a retired medical officer due to inordinate and unexplained delay in investigation violating his constitutional right to a speedy trial.

criminal petition_allowed Significant right to speedy trial inordinate delay quashing of FIR Prevention of Corruption Act

Diamond Entertainment Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Religare Finvest Limited

14 Oct 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:4272

The Delhi High Court held that subsequent disputes arising after a final arbitration award under a loan agreement are arbitrable despite ongoing SARFAESI proceedings and appointed an independent arbitrator to adjudicate the matter.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 SARFAESI Act Loan Agreement Non-Performing Asset

Diamond Entertainment Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Religare Finvest Limited

14 Oct 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:4271

The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising after a prior arbitration award are arbitrable despite ongoing SARFAESI proceedings and appointed an independent arbitrator to adjudicate the loan-related disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 SARFAESI Act Non-Performing Asset Loan Agreement

Ruba Ahmed & Ors. v. Hansal Mehta & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:4263
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application restraining the release of the movie "FARAAZ," holding that the right to privacy does not survive death and the defendants' freedom of expression rights prevail absent concrete infringement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Privacy Interim Injunction Freedom of Speech and Expression Article 21

Delhi Public School Dwarka v. Sarika Prasad and Others

14 Oct 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4293-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that suspension of a private school employee lapses if Director of Education's approval is not obtained within 15 days, and retrospective approval cannot revive a lapsed suspension.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant suspension Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 8(4) Director of Education approval

Adlec Power Pvt. Ltd. v. Apex Homes Pvt. Ltd.

14 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4358

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to lead plaintiff evidence despite delay caused by COVID-19 and corporate merger, setting aside the order closing evidence subject to payment of costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 10(1) CPC Article 227 Constitution of India plaintiff evidence COVID-19 pandemic delay

Sube Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

14 Oct 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4373

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed after 20 years challenging rejection of an alternative plot allotment application due to non-submission of documents, holding the petition barred by delay and lacking merit.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition limitation alternative plot allotment non-submission of documents

Shanti Anand v. Hemant Anand

14 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4363

The Delhi High Court held that a defendant may adopt a written statement filed prior to amendment of a suit as response to the amended suit and allowed cross-examination despite prior procedural closure.

civil petition_allowed Significant amended suit written statement Section 151 CPC Order VI Rule 17 CPC

MBL Infrastructures Ltd. v. Rites Limited & Anr.

14 Oct 2022 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2022:DHC:4467

The Delhi High Court held that an order rejecting amendment of claims in arbitration is not an interim award and thus not challengeable under section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 interim award amendment of claims section 34 challenge

Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. The Senior Examiner of Trade Marks Delhi

14 Oct 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4338

Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the trademark registration refusal of 'ENTREPRENEUR' for fresh consideration, emphasizing distinctness of goods and consent letters under Section 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 11(1) likelihood of confusion trademark registration

Tabish Khan & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi

14 Oct 2022 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:4335

The High Court held that a Magistrate must apply judicial mind and assign reasons when summoning accused placed in column no.12 of the charge-sheet, setting aside the orders summoning petitioners without such reasons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Cognizance Application of judicial mind Charge-sheet columns

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4327

The Delhi High Court remanded a pay arrears and regularization dispute to the Labour Court for fresh adjudication after finding a senior officer's statement unauthorized and stayed recovery certificates pending the decision.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33-C(2) regularization pay arrears

Vipin Kumar Tyagi v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4315-DB

The Delhi High Court directed sympathetic consideration of the petitioner's request for a transfer closer to his residence due to personal hardship, while dismissing interim protection against the transfer order.

administrative appeal_dismissed transfer order interim protection sympathetic consideration service tenure

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Abhishek Verma & Anr.

14 Oct 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:4681

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial Court’s order relaxing bail conditions allowing accused to travel within India subject to informing the Court, dismissing the CBI’s revision petition challenging the modification.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail conditions modification of bail revision petition interlocutory order

M/S AGL LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (NFAC), DELHI AND ANR

14 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4328-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authorities to dispose of the petitioner's appeal within six months after finding non-compliance with a prior court order and rejecting a cryptic stay order.

tax petition_allowed stay application Income Tax appeal compliance with court order reasoned order

M/S SPSS MEDILINE v. Union of India & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4407

The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of the petitioner's GeM account pending disposal of the appeal, emphasizing the requirement of natural justice and due process in administrative actions.

administrative appeal_allowed GeM Incident Management Policy benami identity account suspension natural justice

Johney Reberio v. Union of India & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:4345

The Delhi High Court upheld the bar on legal representation before the Internal Complaints Committee under Rule 7(6) of the Sexual Harassment Rules, dismissing the petition seeking representation by a person of legal background during the enquiry.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act, 2013 Rule 7(6) Sexual Harassment Rules 2013 legal representation Internal Complaints Committee

Rajesh Kumar v. CBI

14 Oct 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:4687

Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges against a junior accountant for knowingly submitting a false stock statement to defraud a bank, rejecting his plea for discharge.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal conspiracy cheating false stock statement prima facie evidence

Seal For Life Industries US LLC v. The Registrar of Trade Marks

14 Oct 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4437

Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remitted the trademark 'ANODEFLEX' registration refusal for fresh consideration, holding that descriptiveness alone cannot bar registration if the mark has acquired distinctiveness through use.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 9(1)(b) descriptive mark acquired distinctiveness

M/S Young Men S Tennis Club v. NDMC

14 Oct 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4416

The Delhi High Court clarified that under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971, appeals must be heard by the District Judge or a judicial officer with at least ten years standing in the district, not necessarily as an Additional District Judge, and accordingly reassigned the appeals for proper disposal.

civil other Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 Section 9 Appeal Appellate Officer