Delhi High Court
60,196 judgments
Mohd Kashif v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the Look Out Circular against a petitioner involved in customs smuggling proceedings, permitting his travel abroad subject to conditions, holding that LOCs should only be issued against accused deliberately evading investigation or arrest.
Ravi Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his transfer within two weeks, without interfering with the transfer order itself.
Brij Mohan v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of an employee following a valid disciplinary inquiry conducted by the competent authority under the Transfer Scheme, finding no violation of natural justice or procedural irregularity.
Rajan Kumar v. Lajja Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s dismissal of a suit for permanent injunction by an unlicensed vegetable seller, holding that inherent powers under Section 151 CPC can be invoked to summarily dismiss frivolous suits lacking prima facie legal right.
Lizbeth Simon & Anr. v. Binu Thomas & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Additional District Judge to expeditiously hear and decide a pending review application in execution proceedings and granted liberty to the petitioners to re-approach if aggrieved.
M/S LABH CONSTRUCTION & INDUSTRIES LTD v. CENTRAL GOVT EMPLOYEES WELFAR HOUSING ORGANISATION
The Delhi High Court held that courts cannot modify arbitral awards by granting pendente lite and post-award interest beyond what the Arbitral Tribunal awarded, setting aside the Single Judge's directions and allowing the appeal.
Priyanka Kumari v. Staff Selection Commission
The Delhi High Court directed the Staff Selection Commission to reconsider the petitioner's claim for two additional marks as per revised answer keys and grant consequential appointment benefits if found fit.
Pardeep v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's application under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC for appointment of a Local Commissioner to demarcate disputed land, clarifying that the provision aids elucidation of matters in dispute and facilitates expeditious resolution.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Delhi v. GEE ISPAT PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, upholding the ITAT's deletion of income additions based on insufficient diary evidence and the Revenue's failure to prosecute a foundational appeal.
Nitesh Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a belated writ petition challenging medical disqualification in a police recruitment process after the final selection list was declared.
Dinesh Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of causing non-grievous injuries, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and noting the unexplained delay in FIR lodging.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 v. M/S. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that advertisement, market and business promotion expenses do not constitute international transactions under Section 92B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dismissing the Revenue's appeal for AY 2010-11.
Ram Charan & Ors. v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation to legal heirs, holding that major and married children are entitled to 'Loss of Dependency' compensation and clarified principles for calculating compensation and allowances under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Miric Biotech Ltd. v. Anil Kumar Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for possession in favor of the purchaser landlord, holding that the tenant cannot challenge the landlord's title under Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act and dismissed the appeal.
Alamgir v. Abdul Rahim Ansari
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation to Rs. 19.53 lakhs for a motor accident victim with 78% permanent disability, emphasizing just and adequate compensation including loss of income, future prospects, and pain and suffering.
Sh. Rajat Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that absence of a post-mortem report alone cannot deny death compensation under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act if medical evidence establishes causation, and remanded the matter for reassessment of compensation.
Vikash Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the medical boards' declaration of the petitioner as 'Unfit' due to Cubitus Valgus and Umbilical Hernia, affirming the binding nature of medical fitness findings supported by original reports.
Naresh & Anr. v. Vijay Ram
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Trial Court's decree for recovery of possession and injunction in favor of the Respondent, holding that the Appellants failed to prove a concluded oral agreement for sale of immovable property.
Bagender Manjhi v. State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for penetrative sexual assault on his one-year-old niece, affirming the reliability of parental testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence despite minor discrepancies.
Narender Khanna v. CVC and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the disciplinary inquiry and termination of an insurance company employee, holding that the inquiry was conducted fairly without bias or violation of natural justice.