Delhi High Court

95,726 judgments

Year:

Vasundhra Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirat Vinodbhai Jadvani & Anr.

13 Oct 2022 · Vibhu Bahkru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4255-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant's composite device trademarks containing 'VASUNDHRA' do not confer exclusive rights over the word alone, and respondent's use of 'VASUNDHRA FASHION' is not deceptively similar or infringing.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off VASUNDHRA device mark

Sunil Kumar v. Directorate General Sashastra Seema Bal

13 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4269-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding restoration of his 2018-19 PAR within a stipulated time, ensuring timely administrative action.

administrative other Performance Appraisal Report service benefits representation administrative delay

Santosh Trust & Anr. v. National Medical Commission & Ors.

13 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:4240

The Delhi High Court quashed MARB’s disapproval of seat increases in petitioner’s medical courses, emphasizing the binding nature of assessors’ reports and the requirement of natural justice before denying permissions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Medical Commission Act, 2019 Medical Assessment and Rating Board increase in medical seats assessors’ reports

Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. v. Shri Narender Singh

13 Oct 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:4239-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award due to non-compliance with mandatory notice under Section 21 and nondisclosure by the arbitrator under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12 disclosure Section 21 notice Section 34 setting aside award

Vijay Malhan v. UOI & Ors.

13 Oct 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4231

The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary removal of a bank officer, holding that procedural irregularities did not prejudice the petitioner and principles of natural justice were complied with.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry natural justice amendment of chargesheet disagreement note

Dassault Systemes S.E. and Anr. v. Automobile Corporation of Goa Limited and Ors.

13 Oct 2022 · Vibhu Bahru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4229-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Commercial Court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain a copyright infringement suit filed by a parent company through its wholly owned subsidiary, and set aside the order dismissing the suit for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC Copyright Act 1957 Section 62(2) Copyright Act

Hakim & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi)

13 Oct 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4223-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 326A IPC for an acid attack, affirming that substances with corrosive or burning nature causing grievous hurt fall within the definition of acid and emphasizing victim compensation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acid attack Section 326A IPC corrosive substance chemical burns

Analjeet Meenaksh Arora v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Rohini

13 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:5930

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.

other petition_dismissed amicable settlement writ petitions disposal as not pressed petitioners

Analjeet; Meenakshi Arora; Avneet; Rinkubhat; Bidya Jha; Renu Raina; Poonam Kumar; Mamta; Saraswathy v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Rohini

13 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:5929

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.

other other amicable settlement writ petitions disposal as not pressed High Court of Delhi

Analjeet; Meenakshi Arora; Avneet; Rinkubhat; Bidya Jha; Renuraina; Poonam Kumar; Mamta; Saraswathy v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Roirni and Anr

13 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:5928

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.

civil petition_dismissed amicable settlement petition not pressed writ petition disposal of petition

Analjeet; Meenakshi Arora; Avneet; Rinkubhat; Bidya Jha; Renu Raina; Poonam Kumar; Mamta; Saraswathy v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Rohini and Anr

13 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:5927

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.

other other amicable settlement writ petitions disposal as not pressed High Court of Delhi

Analjeet; Meenakshi Arora; Avneet; Rinkubhat; Bidya Jha; Renu Raina; Poonam Kumar; Mamta; Saraswathy v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Rohini and Anr

13 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:5926

The High Court of Delhi disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.

other other Procedural amicable settlement writ petitions disposal as not pressed High Court of Delhi

Analjeet Meenakshi Arora Avneet Rinkubhat Bidya Jha Renu Raina Poonam Kumar Mamta Saraswathy v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Rohini

13 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:5925

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.

other other amicable settlement disposal of petitions writ petitions not pressed

Analjeet Meenakshi Arora Avneet Rinku Brat Bidya Jha Renu Raina Poonam Kumar Mamta Saraswathy v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Rohini and Anr

13 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:5924

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.

other other writ petitions amicable settlement disposal as not pressed High Court of Delhi

Vishal @ Goldi v. Sanjay Kumar

13 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4275

The High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a civil suit, emphasizing a lenient approach to ensure the right to defend is not denied.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India written statement

Harish Tiwari v. The State

13 Oct 2022 · Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:4285

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused involved in a serious extortion and blackmail case due to misuse of interim bail, threats to witnesses, failure to surrender, and ongoing investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail interim bail misuse of bail threat to witnesses

Brite Neon Signs Private Limited v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

13 Oct 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:4509

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to transfer a pending Section 9 petition to the appointed arbitrator for treatment as a Section 17 application, maintaining interim deposit directions until further orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition Section 17 application Section 11(6) appointment

Sh. Kishore Kumar v. The Estate Officer, Directorate of Estates and Anr

13 Oct 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4399

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction orders under the Public Premises Act, holding that unchallenged license cancellation and non-compliance with regularization policy preclude relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 license cancellation regularization policy

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Somnath Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

13 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4607-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision allowing certain indirect expenses of a real estate developer as revenue expenditure under AS-7, rejecting Revenue's claim for capitalization.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Revenue expenditure Capital expenditure Accounting Standard AS-7

Wockhardt Limited v. Union of India

13 Oct 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4368-DB

The Delhi High Court held that manufacturers selling scheduled formulations below revised ceiling prices are not required to reduce prices further due to WPI decline, deleting conflicting notification provisions with retrospective effect.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Drugs (Prices Control) Order 2013 Wholesale Price Index ceiling price maximum retail price