Delhi High Court
60,196 judgments
M/S RADIANT HOTELS PRIVATE LTD v. UDAY PILANI
The Delhi High Court held that its jurisdiction under Article 227 is supervisory and limited, refusing to interfere with the NCDRC order and directing the petitioner to seek reconsideration of the jurisdictional issue before the NCDRC.
Azure Hospitality Private Limited v. Phonographic Performance Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an injunction restraining Azure Hospitality from using PPL's copyrighted sound recordings without license, affirming that copyright assignees can independently grant licenses notwithstanding the requirement of registration as a copyright society under Section 33.
State Bank of India v. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed SBI's application to recall its order disposing of an appeal based on a Settlement Agreement, holding that the restoration of Maxwell Securities Pvt Ltd. by the NCLT and subsequent Board Resolution validated the agreement and indemnity bond.
Chattan Dabas v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail application in a murder case, holding that prima facie evidence and gravity of offence outweigh the petitioner's prolonged custody and hostile witnesses at the bail stage.
State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Pappu
The Delhi High Court held that the statutory minimum sentence under Section 10 of the POCSO Act must be imposed, set aside the trial court's probation order, and enhanced the sentence to five years rigorous imprisonment with compensation to the victim.
Rakhi v. Staff Selection Commission
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an agreed hospital to conclusively determine the petitioner's medical fitness for recruitment, making the report final and binding.
PCIT, DELHI-7 v. RATNAGIRI GAS AND POWER PVT. LTD.
The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against ITAT's order on interest capitalization disallowance, holding that concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed without a substantial question of law.
Ex ASI/GD Nikaji Sopan Raghunath v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation for APAR upgradation within four weeks, ensuring timely administrative action without adjudicating on the merits.
Amiteshwar Singh v. Kamal Nain & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint alleging HUF ownership of property cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely on defendant's contentions and that the question of benami property exception requires trial.
Vasundhra Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirat Vinodbhai Jadvani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant's composite device trademarks containing 'VASUNDHRA' do not confer exclusive rights over the word alone, and respondent's use of 'VASUNDHRA FASHION' is not deceptively similar or infringing.
Sunil Kumar v. Directorate General Sashastra Seema Bal
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding restoration of his 2018-19 PAR within a stipulated time, ensuring timely administrative action.
Santosh Trust & Anr. v. National Medical Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed MARB’s disapproval of seat increases in petitioner’s medical courses, emphasizing the binding nature of assessors’ reports and the requirement of natural justice before denying permissions.
Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. v. Shri Narender Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award due to non-compliance with mandatory notice under Section 21 and nondisclosure by the arbitrator under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Vijay Malhan v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary removal of a bank officer, holding that procedural irregularities did not prejudice the petitioner and principles of natural justice were complied with.
Dassault Systemes S.E. and Anr. v. Automobile Corporation of Goa Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Commercial Court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain a copyright infringement suit filed by a parent company through its wholly owned subsidiary, and set aside the order dismissing the suit for lack of jurisdiction.
Hakim & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 326A IPC for an acid attack, affirming that substances with corrosive or burning nature causing grievous hurt fall within the definition of acid and emphasizing victim compensation.
Analjeet Meenaksh Arora v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Rohini
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Analjeet; Meenakshi Arora; Avneet; Rinkubhat; Bidya Jha; Renu Raina; Poonam Kumar; Mamta; Saraswathy v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Rohini
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Analjeet; Meenakshi Arora; Avneet; Rinkubhat; Bidya Jha; Renuraina; Poonam Kumar; Mamta; Saraswathy v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Roirni and Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Analjeet; Meenakshi Arora; Avneet; Rinkubhat; Bidya Jha; Renu Raina; Poonam Kumar; Mamta; Saraswathy v. Managing Committee St Angel's School Rohini and Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as not pressed following an amicable settlement between the parties.