Delhi High Court
60,196 judgments
Md. Riyaz Alam Ansari v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' pending representation regarding alleged miscalculation of recruitment vacancies under CRPF Recruitment Rules, 2010, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Dayawati & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternative plot allotment application under the Scheme of 1961 due to delay, ownership of remaining land, and procedural non-compliance, affirming the conditional nature of entitlement under the Scheme.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Daikin Shri Ram Aircon Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the allowance of depreciation on exclusive business rights and intellectual property rights under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, rejecting Revenue's challenge that goodwill and unregistered trademarks are not eligible for depreciation.
Praveen Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with interest to a petitioner discharged from the Indian Air Force before joining the Central Armed Police Forces, in line with binding precedents.
Mehendiram Foods Products Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the prequalification conditions of a government tender requiring bidders to have an existing running kitchen, holding that such conditions are reasonable and not arbitrary under Article 14.
Sushil Kumar Chauhan v. The State NCT Delhi
Bail was denied to the accused in a gang rape and murder case due to strong prima facie scientific evidence and the gravity of the offence.
MUFG BANK, LTD. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, DELHI AND ORS
Delhi High Court directs Income Tax authorities to comply with Tribunal's order on carry forward of losses and issue refund with interest within eight weeks.
Shahana Parveen v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a woman accused of extortion and related offences, emphasizing compliance with arrest procedure and balancing rights under Section 437(1) CrPC and Arnesh Kumar guidelines.
Honasa Consumer Limited v. RSM General Trading LLC
Delhi High Court grants interim injunction restraining enforcement of Dubai Court decree obtained in breach of arbitration and exclusive jurisdiction clauses, upholding the sanctity of arbitration agreements under Indian law.
Briskworld Ventures Private Limited v. Central Warehousing Corporation and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a tender bid for non-compliance with essential technical bid requirements, affirming limited judicial interference in administrative tender decisions.
Sanjeev Kapoor v. NTPC Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an NTPC transfer order of an employee to an equivalent post in another location, holding that judicial interference in transfers is limited to cases of mala fide or policy violation.
Dr. Sarbesh Bhattacharjee v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs against a retired medical officer due to inordinate delay in investigation violating his constitutional right to a speedy trial, holding the FIRs to be mala fide and an abuse of process.
M/S M. Sons Gems N JJewellery Private Limited & Ors. v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Chapter II of the SARFAESI Act, affirming that borrowers have an effective remedy under Section 17 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal against Asset Reconstruction Companies, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the absence of a separate judicial remedy.
Harshidhi Security Services v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a tender due to ambiguity in worker categorization, emphasizing limited judicial interference in administrative tender decisions absent arbitrariness or mala fide.
Dr. Sarbesh Bhattacharjee v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs against a retired medical officer due to inordinate delay in investigation violating his constitutional right to a speedy trial, highlighting abuse of process and mala fide prosecution.
Deputy Commissioner of Police & Anr v. Neelam Rani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside an ex-parte decree under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, holding that sufficient cause for non-appearance must be liberally construed to ensure substantial justice.
Delhi Development Authority v. Shreya
The Delhi High Court set aside a writ order directing DDA to accept payment from a successful bidder, holding that disputes over e-auction payments and communication must be resolved through arbitration as per the contract.
Pawan Kumar and Ors. v. Divisional Commissioner Department of Revenue Govt of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of sons from a property under the Senior Citizens Act, prioritizing the senior citizen's welfare over disputed property ownership in summary proceedings.
UMA HADA v. SUNIL GUPTA
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC awarding mesne profits at the last paid rent without trial, rejecting the defendant's sham oral sale defense and pandemic-related rent reduction plea.
Manish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to constitute a Medical Board to assess the petitioner’s medical condition and fitness for duty, allowing the petitioner to seek appropriate deployment or challenge the decision.