Delhi High Court

59,941 judgments

Year:

Rinku v. Union of India

01 Dec 2022 · Rekha Palli

The Delhi High Court held that while scientific analysis to detect unfair means in exams is valid, candidates must be given notice and opportunity to respond before their candidature is withheld or cancelled.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant unfair means natural justice scientific methodology IBPS

Deepak Raj v. The Principal Apeejay School and Ors.

01 Dec 2022 · C. Hari Shankar

The Delhi High Court held that schools cannot refuse admission to EWS students shortlisted by the Directorate of Education unless a reduction in seats has been allowed by the DoE, and adjourned the matter for further hearing on the school's entitlement to refuse admission.

administrative other Significant EWS admission Directorate of Education computerized draw of lots reduction of seats

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. CYRIAC MATHEW

01 Dec 2022 · C. HARI SHANKAR; SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN · 2024:DHC:8056-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing pay fixation of Assistant Accounts Officers under Rule 11 of the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, where pay revision follows exercise of option under Rule 5, dismissing the writ petition challenging this approach.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 Rule 5 option Rule 7 pay fixation Rule 11 pay fixation

Krishan Chand Gupta v. Sub Registrar VI-B & Ors.

30 Nov 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5337

The Delhi High Court held that penalty for delay in registration cannot be imposed when the delay is not attributable to the executant and directed registration of the lease deed without enhanced fees.

property petition_allowed Significant Indian Registration Act, 1908 Section 25 Delhi Registration Rules, 1976 penalty for delay

Syed Abu Dojana v. Central Bureau of Investigation

30 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5376

The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 91 Cr.P.C. requiring personal attendance and production of documents is valid and enforceable, and mere submission of documents does not exempt personal appearance.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 91 Cr.P.C. Notice to produce documents Personal attendance Investigating officer summons

Farida Begum v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi through Dy Labour Commissioner & Anr.

30 Nov 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5280

Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition to de-seal a property sealed due to tenant's child labour violations, holding the landlord not liable and permitting use subject to cooperation with investigation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant child labour property sealing tenant misconduct landlord liability

Fateh Chand v. CBI

30 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5320

The High Court held that trial judges may question witnesses under Section 165 of the Evidence Act but must avoid prejudicial findings during evidence, setting aside the trial court's observation and leaving objections open for final adjudication.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural Section 165 Indian Evidence Act trial judge powers cross-examination contradiction in evidence

Vikas Rathor and Ors. v. State of GNCT of Delhi and Anr.

30 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5375

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following a voluntary settlement and withdrawal of allegations by the complainant in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute settlement

Rajeev v. The State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)

30 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5290

The Delhi High Court granted interim bail on humanitarian grounds of the petitioner's mother's serious illness, applying the principle of parity with earlier bail granted, subject to conditions to prevent misuse.

criminal bail_granted interim bail humanitarian grounds serious illness principle of parity

HC/GD M RAMABHUPALA REDDY v. Union of India

30 Nov 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:5275-DB

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against recovery to the petitioner pending final adjudication on his claim for financial upgradations under the ACP and MACP Schemes.

administrative other financial upgradation ACP Scheme MACP Scheme service record

Sahil Mittal and Ors. v. The State N.C.T. of Delhi and Anr

30 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5289

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC following a voluntary settlement and withdrawal of objection by the complainant in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 406 IPC Section 498-A IPC mutual settlement

Suchita Shrivastava v. Reserve Bank of India

30 Nov 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5548

The Delhi High Court held that pregnancy-related medical complications requiring prolonged treatment may qualify for advance sick leave under RBI's Master Circular, directing reconsideration of the petitioner's leave application.

administrative other Significant advance sick leave pregnancy complications maternity leave Reserve Bank of India Master Circular

P.C AGRAWAL v. B.N CHAKRAVORTY & ORS

30 Nov 2022 · CHANDRA DHARI SINGH · 2022:DHC:5335

The Delhi High Court dismissed a belated application to amend issues in a civil suit concerning alleged forgery and privity of contract, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and materiality in framing issues.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XIV Rule 5 CPC amendment of issues framing of issues forgery

Gurudwara Shri Guru Singh Sabha v. Shailendra Singh & Ors.

30 Nov 2022 · Manmeet Pritam Sing Arora · 2022:DHC:5279

The Delhi High Court directed strict compliance with its orders to remove illegal encroachments and obstructions at Gurudwara premises, highlighting contemptuous conduct by private respondents and ordering enforcement by local authorities.

civil other court orders compliance Gurudwara premises illegal encroachment obstruction of access

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -01 v. M/S. C.S. Leasing Pvt. Ltd.

30 Nov 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:5673-DB

The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act requires a satisfaction note recording seized documents or assets belonging to the assessee, and mere association with the searched person is insufficient to initiate proceedings.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153C Income Tax Act Assessing Officer jurisdiction Satisfaction note Seized documents

PLUSPLUS LIFESCIENCES LLP & ANR. v. DR. SHIWANI SINGH & ORS.

30 Nov 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:5217
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court vacated the interim injunction against defendants accused of misusing confidential information and passing off, holding that plaintiffs failed to prima facie establish misuse or deceptive similarity, especially given adverse patent office reports concealed by plaintiffs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant confidential information interim injunction passing off trade mark similarity

STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. AIRHDX.COM & ORS.

30 Nov 2022 · Navin Chawla · CS(COMM) 54/2020
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions against rogue websites illegally streaming copyrighted cricket content, directing domain blocking and ISP compliance to protect exclusive broadcasting rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Summary Judgment Rogue Websites Copyright Infringement Exclusive Broadcasting Rights

AAP KI PASAND & ANR v. HIMALAYAN LEAF PVT LTD

30 Nov 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:5214
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a defendant in a commercial suit must file all relevant documents with the Written Statement or within the granted time, and late filing without reasonable cause after plaintiff's evidence is closed is impermissible and prejudicial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order XI Rule 12 CPC Order VIII Rule 1-A CPC additional documents

Rohit Dubey @ Sunny v. State

30 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma

The Delhi High Court reduced the appellant's sentence for robbery under Sections 394 and 397 IPC to the period already undergone, emphasizing the reformative purpose of sentencing and satisfactory jail conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery Section 394 IPC Section 397 IPC sentence reduction

World Sales Corporation v. Joint Commissioner of Police Licensing

30 Nov 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5281

The Delhi High Court directed the Lieutenant Governor to decide the pending appeal against rejection of an air weapons dealership license by 31st March 2023, dismissing the writ petition while emphasizing the need for a reasoned and expeditious order.

administrative petition_dismissed dealership license air weapons blank firing firearms Arms Act, 1959