Delhi High Court
59,941 judgments
Dilip Singh Kapoor & Ors. v. Neeraj Khanna & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on the ground of bona fide requirement by landlords for business expansion, emphasizing the necessity of suitable alternative accommodation and respecting the landlord's subjective choice once bona fide need is objectively established.
Sandeep Bhalla and Ors. v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld RBI's withdrawal restrictions on PMC Bank depositors under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, rejecting claims of negligence, arbitrariness, and discrimination.
Brajendra Singh Bhadouriya v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a government servant accused of assisting in creation of fake sale deeds in a large-scale Ponzi scheme, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and parity with co-accused.
Md. Riyaz Alam Ansari (Shaurya Chakra) & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioners' representation on vacancy calculation under CRPF Recruitment Rules, directing fresh consideration and communication within a stipulated timeframe.
STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. v. WATCHONLINEMOVIESHD.ONLINE & ORS.
Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunction against rogue websites infringing copyright, directing domain suspension and ISP blocking to prevent unauthorized streaming of the Plaintiff's film.
Joginder Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant was required to vacate Key Personnel Accommodation upon transfer and no valid conversion to General Pool Accommodation occurred, justifying eviction.
Rahul Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement and divorce decree, holding that such compromise justifies quashing criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes.
Rajender Pahwa v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an industrial tribunal award for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the appropriate forum is the High Court where the original adjudicatory authority is situated.
Brij Bhushan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to pass the final order in the petitioner’s departmental enquiry within two weeks, emphasizing adherence to DOPT guidelines for timely disposal.
Gulshan Kumar Chawla v. Vijay Kumar Chawla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to summon relevant witnesses to support his defence in a probate petition, emphasizing the necessity of examining material witnesses for fair adjudication.
Sandeep Thakur v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a contract employee guilty of misconduct can be lawfully terminated without renewal or show cause notice, and the settled principle barring replacement by another contract employee does not apply in such cases.
Ankush Sood v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a voluntary settlement and withdrawal of complaint by the complainant in a matrimonial dispute.
Narinder Kumar Jain v. Simmi Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed legal representatives of a deceased petitioner to file a written statement after closure of the right, subject to costs, and directed the Trial Court to proceed accordingly.
Vijay Kumar & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement and withdrawal of complaint by the complainant during divorce proceedings.
Sh. Mahaveer Prasad Saini v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties settled amicably and the complainant withdrew the complaint voluntarily.
Adobe, Inc v. Namase Patel and Others
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and damages to Adobe Inc. against Defendant 1 for trademark infringement and cyber squatting involving confusingly similar domain names and misuse of catch-all email services.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. State Bank through Rajinder Kumar Dhingra
The Delhi High Court set aside the Special Judge's order denying jurisdiction and rejecting search warrants, holding that invocation of the PC Act at the investigation stage is not premature and remanded the matter for proper disposal.
PUMA SE v. D.K. ARORA
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint alleging trade mark infringement must not be rejected under Order VII Rule 10 CPC if it discloses a cause of action within territorial jurisdiction, and set aside the order returning the plaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Asif Raza Khan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for pension restoration based on a 55% disability certificate as a representation and decide it within a stipulated time.
Phool Singh @ Phool Chand v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to recall a mentally disabled child victim for cross-examination after a three-year delay, balancing the accused's fair trial rights with POCSO Act protections.