Delhi High Court

94,906 judgments

Year:

Pragati Engineers v. Government of NCT Delhi

05 Dec 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:5323-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a tender bid for non-submission of mandatory OEM authorization documents, holding that judicial interference in tender decisions is limited to cases of illegality or arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender rejection OEM authorization certificate eligibility criteria

Pradip Goswami v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Dec 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:5340-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that injuries sustained by a CISF member during sanctioned leave travel are attributable to official duties, entitling him to Work Related Illness and Injury Leave under DoP&T rules.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Work Related Illness and Injury Leave CISF Special Disability Leave Authorized Leave Travel

Anup Kapoor v. Pradeep Roy

05 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · CRL.L.P. 83-84/2021

The Delhi High Court allowed petitions to restore complaints dismissed in default under Section 138 NI Act due to medical emergency, imposing costs on the petitioner.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dismissal in default non-prosecution medical emergency

Nishant Khatri v. Bar Council of India & Anr.

05 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5413
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that advocates cannot be debarred from practice for failing to clear the All India Bar Examination within two years when the exam was not conducted due to administrative delays, directing the Bar Council of India to conduct the exam promptly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant All India Bar Examination AIBE Rules 2010 Bar Council of India provisional enrolment

Divya Jain v. State Bank of India & Ors.

05 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5456

The Delhi High Court upheld the SBI’s rejection of a compassionate transfer request where the petitioner was not the sole child, emphasizing limited judicial interference in transfer decisions absent mala fide or policy violation.

administrative petition_dismissed compassionate transfer inter-circle transfer transfer policy judicial review

FMC Corporation & Ors. v. Natco Pharma Limited

05 Dec 2022 · Vibhu Bahru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:5311-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed FMC's appeal, holding that Natco's process using thionyl chloride does not infringe FMC's process patent requiring sulfonyl chloride, applying the doctrine of equivalents with an element-by-element analysis.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant patent infringement process patent doctrine of equivalents sulfonyl chloride

Sheela Devi v. Office of Commissioner Excise Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

05 Dec 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:5330-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, holding that the appellant exhausted all statutory remedies and the writ petition was maintainable despite the bar under Section 60 of the Delhi Excise Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Excise Act confiscation writ petition Article 226

Ram Charan Bansal Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Jal Board

05 Dec 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:5322-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the tender award to the lowest bidder despite non-submission of bidding capacity, holding that the specific tender clause exempted such submission for projects below Rs. 25 crores and courts should defer to the tendering authority’s interpretation absent mala fide.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender bidding capacity financial eligibility criteria technical eligibility criteria

Meinhardt Australia Pty Ltd v. Airport Authority of India & Anr.

05 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5412

The Delhi High Court held that disputes over reduction of performance bank guarantees under a contract with an arbitration clause must be resolved through arbitration, dismissing the writ petition challenging the Dispute Resolution Committee's rejection of the petitioner's claim.

administrative appeal_dismissed performance bank guarantee reduction of security deposit Government circular 12 November 2020 Dispute Resolution Committee

Latifun Nisha v. Union of India & Anr.

05 Dec 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:5379

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that recovery of a valid journey ticket establishes the deceased as a bona fide passenger, entitling the claimant to compensation for death due to fall from a moving train under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 valid journey ticket bona fide passenger untoward incident

New India Assurance Company Limited v. Khanna Paper Mills Limited

05 Dec 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:5304

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting insurer's plea of accord and satisfaction, holding that a blank discharge voucher signed under financial duress does not extinguish insurance claims.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Joint Discharge Voucher Accord and Satisfaction

Ram Kumar and Anr. v. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.

05 Dec 2022 · Vibhu Bahru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:5313-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award due to the arbitrator's failure to make mandatory disclosures under Section 12(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and held that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator without consent is impermissible.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(1) disclosure Section 12(5) ineligibility unilateral appointment

Syed Jabir Ahamed v. Central Industrial Security Force

05 Dec 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:5343-DB

The Delhi High Court held that dismissal disqualifying an employee from future government employment does not bar private sector employment unless explicitly stated.

administrative petition_dismissed dismissal from service disqualification for future employment government employment private employment

Union of India v. M/s Parishudh Machines Pvt. Ltd.

05 Dec 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:5336

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award favoring the supplier, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 Arbitration Act is limited and the award was neither perverse nor beyond contract terms.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Judicial Interference Public Policy

National Commodities Management Services Limited v. Food Corporation of India

02 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5357

The Delhi High Court directed FCI to release original bank guarantees upon receipt of equivalent amounts in cash from the petitioner, preventing double recovery under the contract.

civil petition_allowed bank guarantee performance security invocation of bank guarantee release of bank guarantee

Nand Kishore v. State Election Commissioner & Ors.

02 Dec 2022 · Vikas Mahajan · 2022:DHC:5291

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging election symbol allotment during ongoing municipal elections, holding that such disputes must be raised through election petitions post-results and judicial interference at intermediate stages is barred by Article 329(b) of the Constitution.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant election symbol allotment Article 226 Article 329(b) writ petition

Zafar Mohd v. Vaseem Saifi

02 Dec 2022 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5383

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to hear and decide consolidated applications under Section 39 CPC by a fixed date without adjournments, disposing of the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Procedural Section 39 CPC application consolidation adjournment restriction trial court directions

Kunal Bhandari @ Rocky v. State

02 Dec 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:5267-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of appellants for kidnapping and murdering a minor for ransom, relying on credible eyewitness testimony corroborated by circumstantial and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant kidnapping for ransom murder common intention eyewitness testimony

Sanjay v. State & Anr.

02 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:212
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Rahul Suri & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

02 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5626

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on the complainant's voluntary settlement and withdrawal of allegations in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 498-A IPC Section 406 IPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute