Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Sh. K.D. Sharma v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court held that employees compulsorily retired as a penalty are entitled to Leave Encashment benefits under Regulation 38, directing Bank of Baroda to release such benefits to petitioners.
Kala Ram @ Kamlesh v. The State
The Delhi High Court set aside the declaration of the petitioner as a Proclaimed Offender under Section 82 CrPC since he had offered to surrender pursuant to the Supreme Court's direction, holding that such declaration is impermissible while surrender application is pending.
Prashant Kumar Jha & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a decade-old FIR involving allegations of harassment and child labour after the complainant and her guardian expressed no grievance and the parties settled the matter amicably.
Ravinder Rawat & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following a bona fide settlement and voluntary withdrawal of objections by the complainant in a matrimonial dispute.
Harkrishan Singh v. Pargat Singh
The Delhi High Court restored a criminal complaint dismissed for non-prosecution due to a clerical error in noting the date and technical filing issues, subject to costs and conditions.
Shri Honey Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and voluntary waiver of claims by the complainant in a matrimonial dispute.
Vijay Kansal Prop. Aarti Steels v. ITO, Ward 35 (1) Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices and order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2013-14, holding that reassessment must be based on thorough examination of material beyond Investigation Wing reports and granting liberty for fresh proceedings in accordance with law.
Dipty Arora & Ors v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC following a voluntary settlement between parties and the complainant's withdrawal of objections to prosecution.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 v. M/S Nokia Solutions and Networks OY
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, holding that no profits can be attributed to the respondent's permanent establishment in India under the India-Finland DTAA when the respondent records a global net loss.
Praveen Aggarwal v. State
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly attested and uncontested will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, allowing Letters of Administration to the petitioner.
VK Arora v. Cement Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a public sector employee in disciplinary proceedings despite delay and procedural lapses, emphasizing evidence on preponderance of probabilities and absence of prejudice.
Queen Marry S School v. Kavita Mishra
The Delhi High Court recorded an amicable settlement awarding monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement to a terminated employee who had attained superannuation.
Babita Gulati & Anr. v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. & Anr.
Delhi High Court directs electricity authority to grant fresh connection to tenant without landlord's NOC, emphasizing electricity as an essential service and without prejudice to ownership disputes.
Pankaj v. State
Bail was denied to the accused found in conscious possession of commercial quantity of ganja under the NDPS Act, as the stringent conditions under Section 37 of the Act were not satisfied.
Shyam Bharteey v. Central Board of Film Certification Regional Officer Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court clarified that appeals against refusal of film certification under the Cinematograph Act now lie before the High Court as Regular First Appeals following abolition of the Appellate Tribunal.
Chand Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to keep the petitioner's transfer order in abeyance till 30.04.2023 on humanitarian grounds considering his wife's medical treatment and children's education.
Kalyan Singh Bachhil v. M/s Utility Powertech Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a suit for recovery filed beyond three years from the last payment or bill date is barred by limitation, and reminders or undisclosed certification dates do not extend the limitation period.
Banarsi Lal v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Banarsi Lal for murder based on last seen evidence, motive, recovery of the deceased's mobile phone at his instance, and a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the accused's failure to explain the circumstances of death under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.
INSP /GD Sandeep Kumar Dubey v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that pay fixation and increments depend on actual appointment date and completion of service period, dismissing a petition seeking pay parity for delayed appointment despite seniority fixed as per merit.
Ajay Rawat v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the BSF dismissal order, holding that the petitioner’s delay was inordinate and the SSFC proceedings were conducted lawfully with limited scope for judicial interference.