Delhi High Court

59,941 judgments

Year:

Manoj Kumar Bisht v. Ankit Somani

29 Nov 2022 · Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:5210

The Delhi High Court held that a complaint under Section 138 NI Act filed through a power of attorney holder is maintainable even without specific averment of personal knowledge, and the competency of the attorney is to be tested at trial, not at summoning.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 142 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC Power of Attorney

Swiss Bike Vertrjevs Gmbh Subsidiary of Accell Group v. Imperial Cycle Meg. Co.

29 Nov 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5248

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark 'RALLIES' for bicycles due to its deceptive similarity with the plaintiff's registered trademark 'RALEIGH', allowing limited time to clear existing stock.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off interim injunction phonetic similarity

Shri Narender Kumar Gulati v. V.K. Gulati & Ors.

29 Nov 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · CS(OS) 1666/2009

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition of a property held benami, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove the property was held in trust and that the suit was barred under the Benami Property Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit benami property burden of proof registered sale deed

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. PEC Ltd.

29 Nov 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's ruling that CSR expenditure incurred before assessment year 2015-16 is deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, as the amendment excluding such expenses is prospective.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Corporate Social Responsibility Section 37 Income Tax Act deduction Explanation 2

Pallab Chakraborty v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

29 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5286

The Delhi High Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application after chargesheet filing, directing the petitioner to seek regular bail before the trial court.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail chargesheet custodial interrogation regular bail

Supertech Realtors Private Limited v. Bank of Maharashtra

29 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:5243-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition cannot be used to alter the terms of a One-Time Settlement contract, affirming that the moratorium period must be calculated from the original sanction date and dismissing the appellant's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant One-Time Settlement moratorium period contract modification Article 226

Power Grid Corporation of India Limited v. Deepak Cables (India) Limited (In Liq)

29 Nov 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:5272

The Delhi High Court upheld the Sole Arbitrator's right to revise arbitration fees under the Fourth Schedule after stay of multiple arbitration proceedings, dismissing the petition seeking termination of his mandate.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration fee Section 14 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Fourth Schedule Sole Arbitrator

Raj Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

29 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5370

The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the accused in a serious economic offence involving illegal gratification, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and thorough investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. illegal gratification economic offence

Naveen alias Akshay v. State and Anr.

29 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5307

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354A, and 506 IPC after the complainant married the accused and they were living together peacefully without coercion.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 354 IPC Section 354A IPC Section 506 IPC

Smt Madhu v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 Nov 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:5252

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of investigation into a death alleged to be murder, holding the police inquiry was adequate and no foul play was established.

criminal petition_dismissed writ of mandamus investigation transfer of investigation independent agency

M/S Jansevak Textile Mill v. Chanchal Trading Company

29 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1713

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by directing release of fixed deposit amounts to the parties as per their amicable settlement.

civil appeal_allowed amicable settlement fixed deposit receipt release of funds appeal disposal

Ms. Shreeya Sud v. Aman Singh

29 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that while courts generally defer to expert medical boards in police recruitment, a re-review medical examination may be directed on individual merits where procedural irregularities or injustice are shown, and such re-review shall be final and binding.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical fitness recruitment Delhi Police Medical Board

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Anil Luthra

29 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1700-DB

Failure to exercise option to continue under CPF within stipulated time results in automatic inclusion in Pension Scheme, and acceptance of CPF benefits thereafter does not bar pension entitlement.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Pension Scheme Contributory Provident Fund Deemed pension optee Office Order 1992

Madhu Jain v. Shashi Rani

28 Nov 2022 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:5297
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of the landlady's bona fide requirement of the premises for conducting tutorial classes post-retirement, affirming the Rent Controller's order and limiting revisional interference.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement landlord-tenant relationship eviction Delhi Rent Control Act

Sh. Ranjeet Kumar Ram v. Union of India & Anr.

28 Nov 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:5209
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the railway is strictly liable to compensate a bona fide passenger injured in an untoward incident, even if contributory negligence is present, and remanded the claim for compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Railways Act 1989 Section 124-A strict liability

Bennett, Coleman and Company Limited v. E1 Entertainment Television, LLC and Anr.

28 Nov 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:5230

The Delhi High Court held that a rectification petition against a trademark registration is maintainable independently if the trademark is not the subject matter of any pending suit and no invalidity defense under Section 30(2)(e) is pleaded, dismissing the respondent's application to reject the petition.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 124 Section 30(2)(e) rectification petition

Sanjeev Kumar v. Mohammad Mobeen and Anr.

28 Nov 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:5208

The Delhi High Court upheld the penalty imposed on an employer under the Employees’ Compensation Act for failure to timely submit the claim form to the insurer, affirming the limited scope of appeals under Section 30 of the Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Section 30 appeal Section 4-A(3)(b) penalty scope of appellate jurisdiction

Punjab National Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement

28 Nov 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:5212-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal against interim orders under PMLA, directing the tribunal to consider the appellant's case expeditiously without commenting on merits.

criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural Prevention of Money Laundering Act interim orders tribunal constitution expeditious disposal

Kapil Goel v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India and Anr.

28 Nov 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5221

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the suspension of a Resolution Professional for misusing the name 'IBBI' in his private firm, upholding the disciplinary action under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and IBBI Regulations.

administrative petition_dismissed Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Resolution Professional IBBI Disciplinary Committee

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S Suncon Soma (JV)

28 Nov 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:5224

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting compensation exceeding the DRB recommendation, affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration and the non-binding nature of DRB recommendations when arbitration is initiated.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Dispute Review Board Concession Agreement Section 34 challenge