Delhi High Court

28,224 judgments

Year:

MS Oxygun Health Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Pneumo Care Health Pvt Ltd & Anr.

06 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3897-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismisses appeal against decree for trademark and design infringement, upholding injunction, damages, and evidentiary principles under amended CPC and Trade Marks Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off registered design Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Neelam Agnihotri v. State

05 Apr 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:2358

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings against a petitioner accused of employing a minor domestic help, holding that the victim was not a minor and no prima facie offence was made out under Section 75 JJ Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 75 Juvenile Justice Act Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR ossification test

Precitech Enclosures Systems Pvt Ltd v. Rudrapur Precision Industries & Anr.

04 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2025:DHC:1677
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed Precitech's Section 9 petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the Rent Agreement confers jurisdiction solely on courts at Rudrapur, despite consent to Delhi as arbitration venue.

civil petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction exclusive jurisdiction clause arbitral seat arbitral venue

7d431e07f16782e39486f86f36658bbb5f2ea178753808e74a92ffd2cc2925e9

30 Mar 2022 · Vidnesh Maheshwari; Avinrudh Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of unilateral valuation and recovery orders passed without jurisdiction and proper procedure under the UP VAT Act, affirming principles of natural justice and territorial jurisdiction.

tax appeal_allowed Significant unilateral valuation order jurisdiction natural justice VAT Act

Priya alias Pooja v. Hari Chand and Ors.

28 Mar 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2186
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a first appellate court's order for erroneously exercising second appellate jurisdiction and failing to re-appreciate evidence, condoned delay in filing the second appeal, and remitted the matter for de novo consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant first appeal Section 96 CPC second appeal Section 100 CPC

Bristol Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company & Ors. v. Jigs Chemical Limited & Anr.

25 Mar 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:9428

The Delhi High Court decreed the suit against both defendants, upheld a court-mediated settlement with Defendant 2, dismissed Defendant 1's application to set aside ex parte order, and awarded costs to the plaintiff.

civil appeal_dismissed patent infringement settlement agreement Order VIII Rule 10 CPC ex parte order

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. United Trading Company

15 Mar 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5564

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate a loan repayment dispute governed by a valid arbitration agreement.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 Section 12(2)

Kasturba Nagar Residents Welfare Association v. Government of NCT Delhi

14 Mar 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:1932-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that only slum clusters identified and notified by DUSIB under the 2010 Act are entitled to rehabilitation under the 2015 Policy, dismissing the appeal of residents of an unnotified cluster against demolition.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant DUSIB Act 2010 Delhi Slum Rehabilitation Policy 2015 Jhuggi Jhopri Basti Slum rehabilitation

J.S. Builder v. Dr. Girish Gupta

12 Mar 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5382

The Delhi High Court directed reference of a contractual financial dispute to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that objections on overpayment do not negate the arbitration agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 Section 12

Union of India v. Surender Singh Rathore

11 Mar 2022 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3302-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting invalid pension to an army personnel invalided out before completing 10 years of service, relying on a government circular extending pension benefits and striking down exclusionary provisos as unconstitutional.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant invalid pension Army Pension Regulations 1961 qualifying service disability pension

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. AND ANOTHER v. INDER TRAVESLS PVT.LTD. & ORS

10 Mar 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:5632

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs' partial application to file additional documents in a commercial suit after establishing reasonable cause for non-disclosure, emphasizing a liberal approach to procedural compliance to ensure substantial justice.

civil other Significant Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC reasonable cause additional documents commercial suit

Rekha Devi @ Babi v. State

06 Mar 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:1672

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping a minor girl under Sections 366/34 IPC, dismissing the appeal but reducing the sentence from three years to one year imprisonment with an increased fine.

criminal appeal_dismissed kidnapping Section 366 IPC minor girl inducement

VPS Healthcare Private Limited & Anr. v. Prabhat Kumar Srivastava & Anr.

04 Mar 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2023:DHC:2922
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that respondents' indemnity obligation under a consent award arises only after liability is confirmed by the highest court of appeal, dismissing the enforcement petition as premature.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Consent award enforcement Contract of indemnity Interpretation of contract

Asian Hotels North Ltd v. Yes Bank Ltd & Ors.

03 Mar 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:1574

The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of all consortium lenders as defendants under Order I Rule 10 CPC to ensure complete adjudication of a loan restructuring dispute involving multiple parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order I Rule 10 CPC Order I Rule 8 CPC impleadment One-Time Restructuring

Harsh Ajay Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

27 Feb 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Agnipath Scheme and dismissed petitions challenging its introduction and cancellation of prior recruitment processes, emphasizing limited judicial review in national security matters.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Agnipath Scheme constitutional validity national security judicial review

National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Limited v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.

22 Feb 2022 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:1272

The Delhi High Court upheld the revisional court's order allowing partial release and defreezing of seized shares and D-MAT accounts of a non-accused company under section 451 CrPC, balancing investigative interests with property rights pending trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 451 CrPC D-MAT account freezing Proceeds of crime Seizure of property

Vikas Pandey v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

20 Feb 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:1220

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of attempted murder and arms offences, emphasizing bail as the rule and imposing conditions to safeguard the trial.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. Section 307 IPC Arms Act

Anaysha Dhika v. Maxfort School & Anr.

18 Feb 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2262
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed provisional admission of a disadvantaged child to a school as per the Directorate of Education's draw of lots, rejecting the binding nature of a cut-off date for admission fixed by a Single Judge.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant school admission draw of lots disadvantaged group provisional admission

Master Arpit v. Adriel High School & Anr.

18 Feb 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3516
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a school must admit a child shortlisted through the DoE's computerized draw of lots under EWS category and that the 31 December cut-off for provisional admissions is not a binding rule where Division Bench orders permit admissions beyond that date.

administrative petition_allowed Significant EWS admission Directorate of Education computerized draw of lots provisional admission

M v. State

13 Feb 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:1561

The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition challenging an FIR registered under IPC and POCSO provisions after the petitioner chose not to pursue it, directing police to ensure the petitioner’s safety.

criminal petition_dismissed FIR registration Section 323 IPC Section 506 IPC Section 195A IPC