Delhi High Court
28,224 judgments
Hewlett-Packard Financial Services (India) Private Limited v. Kuber Digital Studio
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing an arbitrator and referring the disputes to arbitration, confirming the limited scope of court's jurisdiction in such matters.
Goyal Housing Developrs LLP v. K. L. Rathi Steels Limited
The Delhi High Court held that allegations of fraud in an arbitration agreement must be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Union of India v. Jagdish Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld that the post of Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (NFSG) is a promotional post under statutory IRS Rules, entitling seniors to promotion alongside juniors despite contrary executive instructions.
Ved Prakash v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to pay the petitioner arrears of pay revision and retiral benefits under the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions along with interest, enforcing entitlement by operation of law under the Delhi School Education Act.
Deepak Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings against a BSF officer for acting beyond jurisdiction on verbal orders, holding that the inquiry and further evidence gathering were lawful and the Court would not interfere at the interlocutory stage.
Tata Capital Limited v. Aryan Pharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court's role is limited to verifying the arbitration agreement and timeliness, without adjudicating on the merits.
Balbir Singh Bisht v. M/S. A V Workshop Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that illegal termination does not automatically entitle reinstatement, enhanced retrenchment compensation was awarded instead, and reinstatement was denied due to loss of trust and confidence.
Sonia v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed applications under Section 151 CPC seeking directions for amendment approval and leave, holding that such applications cannot reopen or review a disposed writ petition and must be exercised with judicial restraint.
Handeep Singh Kharbanda and Ors. v. M/S T.R.E. Institute of Hotel and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that KSOU's distance education programs outside Karnataka were unauthorized, denied degree issuance, but directed refund of fees to students who enrolled in good faith.
Medeor Hospital Limited v. Ernst and Young LLP
The Delhi High Court upheld a majority arbitral award awarding success fees to EY, holding that an award signed by the majority of arbitrators is valid despite dissent and that the share sale fell within the engagement scope.
Subhash Chandra Tripathi & Ors. v. Directorate General, Indo Tibetan Border Police Force & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that seniority between direct recruit and promotee Assistant Commandants in ITBP must be fixed strictly by their dates of appointment as per statutory CRPF Rules, quashing a seniority list that placed promotees senior retrospectively.
M/S Ramacivil India Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The court held that interest on an arbitral award amount ceases from the date of deposit with the court under Section 36(3) of the Arbitration Act or Order XXI Rule 1 CPC, and the decree holder is not entitled to additional interest during the deposit period despite conditions on withdrawal.
Pradeep Kumar Aggarwal v. Anoop Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator as directed by the Supreme Court and refused to allow a party who voluntarily joined arbitration proceedings to withdraw at this stage.
Comptroller and Auditor General of India & Ors. v. Nirbhay Kumar Santosh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Principal Bench's jurisdiction to entertain a transfer-related OA based on part of the cause of action arising in Delhi and affirmed the Chairman's power to retain cases under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunals Act.
Subrat Kumar Panigrahi v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitrary adverse remark and the consequent '3' grading in the appellant’s 2018-2019 ACR, directing a fresh assessment, while upholding the rejection of challenge to the 1996-1997 grading.
Krishna Kishore Singh v. Sarla A Saraogi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a film clearly depicting the life of deceased actor SSR infringed his posthumous personality and publicity rights vested in his legal heir, entitling the plaintiff to injunction against its streaming despite defendants' disclaimer.
Manish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the appointment of a GM Legal on deputation and direct recruitment, holding that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the appointment was not illegal.
Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. B K Podder Printing Pvt Ltd and Ors.
Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act based on arbitration clauses fixing seat at Delhi, limiting its inquiry to existence of arbitration agreement and timeliness of petition.
Khandelwal Edible Oils Limited v. Landsmill Agro Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the defendant's use of the mark "CHAKRA KOLHU" infringes the plaintiff's registered trademark "CHAKRA" and copyright in its label, granting permanent injunction against such use while dismissing claims against other marks.
State of Haryana v. Bhagwan Mahaveer College of Engg. and Management and Anr
The writ petition against Bhagwan Mahaveer College was disposed of as not pressed after the college merged with another institute, rendering the petition infructuous.