Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Dinesh Maidasani v. State
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a Will after the petitioner proved its valid execution and testamentary capacity, with all objections withdrawn or abandoned and no suspicious circumstances found.
TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. THAKUR COMPUTER SOLUTIONS AND TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in a trademark infringement suit where the defendant acknowledged infringement and undertook to cease use and destroy infringing goods, leading to dismissal of further adjudication.
Sonya Surabhi Gupta v. Jamia Millia Islamia
The Delhi High Court dismissed as premature a writ petition challenging suspension of a university professor pending a statutory appeal before the Executive Council, directing expeditious disposal of the appeal.
MBL Infrastructures Ltd v. Telecommunication Consultants of India
Delhi High Court set aside a Single Judge's partial modification of an arbitral award, reaffirming that courts under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act can only set aside but not modify awards.
Sharad Mehra v. Sanjay Mehra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal concerning segregation of credit facilities and assets between company divisions under a family settlement, directing expeditious NCLT disposal of the demerger petition and leaving enforcement of agreements open for future court intervention.
Samsung Electronics India Pvt Ltd v. Trell Experiences Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act directing the respondent to furnish a bank guarantee securing the admitted debt to prevent frustration of arbitral award enforcement.
Riveria Commercial Developers Ltd v. Brompton Lifestyle Brands Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted eviction to the landlord based on admitted month-to-month tenancy arising from an unregistered lease deed, held the suit exempt from pre-institution mediation due to urgent interim relief, and rejected the defendant’s objections on maintainability and evidentiary grounds.
Prateek Arora v. CBI Through Its Director
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a cyber fraud case involving cryptocurrency due to the seriousness of offences, absconding status, and necessity of custodial interrogation, applying the principles of Arnesh Kumar regarding arrest procedures.
Virendra Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the respondent to reimburse medical expenses upon submission of duly verified bills for knee replacement surgery.
Gulam Mahabub v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that government hospitals cannot discriminate against non-residents in providing medical treatment, directing immediate MRI for the petitioner and reaffirming the constitutional right to health without residence-based discrimination.
Armour Security Pvt. Ltd. v. Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to reduce the Local Commissioner's fee from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 3,000 per sitting, emphasizing that fees must be reasonable and recording evidence through a Local Commissioner requires parties' consent.
Rushmika Chatterji v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a cheque dishonour complaint against a company director, holding that vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires evidence of control or neglect and cannot be decided at the pre-trial stage.
M/S RELX INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 78(1) DELHI & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking refund and stay of tax recovery, directing expeditious disposal of the pending appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
JOYVISION ELECTROMEC v. FIRST FEEL INTERNATIONAL; JOYVISION ELECTROMEC v. SALASAR EXIM LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a suit dismissed in default due to a mistaken hearing date, emphasizing that parties should not be deprived of remedies on technical grounds and directing the trial court to proceed with the suit after restoration.
Dr. Asmita Kabra v. Ramjas College & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed Ramjas College to disburse pension and retiral benefits to Dr. Asmita Kabra with interest for delayed payment following Governing Body approval.
Ms Vasudha Srivastava v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions against Air India Ltd. are not maintainable post-disinvestment as it ceased to be a public authority amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.
Saroj v. Surat Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of an application to reject a plaint on limitation grounds, holding that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law not decidable at the threshold without evidence.
Bharat Seeds Corporation v. ACIT Circle 34(1) New Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices and order for lack of reasoned consideration under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, directing the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh reasoned order after hearing the assessee.
Amit Goel v. Central Vigilance Commission
The Delhi High Court held that the CVC must independently investigate complaints against its own officers and cannot delegate such complaints back to the same official, upholding the principle of natural justice.
Sushma Singh v. Ram Bhajan Pal
The Delhi High Court held that a written promise to pay a time-barred debt under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act revives the creditor's right to sue, allowing recovery of the full loan amount despite limitation objections.