Delhi High Court
60,724 judgments
Himani Malhotra v. Indraprastha College of Women and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to expedite constitution of the Appeal Committee and process subsistence allowance for a terminated teacher during the pendency of her appeal under Ordinance XII-A.
DLF LTD. v. IL&FS ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator against IL&FS group companies, holding that the NCLAT moratorium under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act bars arbitration proceedings during the resolution process.
Sh. Subhash Chand Jain & Anr. v. Smt. Savita Devi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed appellants to retain possession of the suit property till a specified date on undertaking to pay rent arrears and restrained them from harassing the respondents.
M/S RPG ENTERPRISES LIMITED v. RPG DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to RPG Enterprises Limited against RPG Developers for unauthorized use of the well-known 'RPG' trademark, holding it to be infringement and passing off.
Inderjeet Singh v. Seema Khattar
The Delhi High Court held that procedural applications under Order XI CPC and Section 151 CPC are maintainable in eviction petitions under the Delhi Rent Control Act and must be taken on record and decided on merits.
MS BBR (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. MS ATS DREAM ZONE PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes between MS BBR (India) Pvt Ltd and MS ATS Dream Zone Pvt Ltd arising from a work order.
Hamdard National Foundation (India) & Anr. v. Sadar Laboratories Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted an injunction restraining the respondent from using the deceptively similar trademark 'SHARBAT DIL AFZA' for syrups and beverages, holding it infringed the appellants' well-known 'ROOH AFZA' mark.
Bhartiya Chikitsa Kendriya Parishad v. P.O. Industrial Tribunal No-III & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Council of Indian Medicine qualifies as an industry under the Industrial Disputes Act but upheld the lawful termination of a probationer employee, setting aside the Labour Court's reinstatement award.
Gulshan Khanna v. Bharat Kalra
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to take the respondent's written statement on record subject to an additional cost of Rs. 10,000, modifying the Trial Court's order accordingly.
Ansari v. Union of India
Delhi High Court directed filling of unfilled vacancies from next-in-merit candidates in SSB and CAPF recruitments, emphasizing merit and category criteria despite absence of explicit wait list provisions.
Komal Chadha v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a woman accused under section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, holding that the proviso to section 212(6) exempts women from stringent bail conditions and that judicial custody requires specific justification absent here.
M/S ICICI BANK LTD v. M/S WINNER CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal to set aside an ex parte order by construing Order IX Rule 7 CPC liberally, emphasizing adjudication on merits over technicalities.
XERICA WIDENING HORIZONS LLP v. QR PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the competent Commercial Court to consider the petitioner's application expeditiously after the plaint was returned for lack of jurisdiction, disposing of the petition without further orders.
Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment orders and notices issued without granting a mandatory personal hearing under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, remitting the matter for fresh proceedings.
Bharat Agro Overseas (India) v. ACIT Circle 34(1) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices issued without furnishing material to the petitioner and directed the Assessing Officer to provide relevant information before proceeding further under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
KAIRA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD. & ANR v. AMUL BRUSH ENTERPRISES & ANR
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining defendants from using the AMUL marks, ordering seizure of infringing goods, and awarding actual costs against the defendants.
Bijender Mehto v. GNCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of sexual offences under POCSO, balancing the presumption of guilt with the accused's right to fair trial and considering the consensual nature of the relationship and victim's stance.
Archaeological Survey of India v. Presiding Officer, CGIT & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Archaeological Survey of India is an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and that termination of a casual worker without compliance of Section 25-F was illegal, awarding monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement.
GDR Finance and Leasing Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 10(1), New Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside tax reassessment notices due to erroneous identification of the entity involved in alleged accommodation entries, emphasizing the necessity of correct naming alongside PAN for valid tax proceedings.
Rakesh Kumar & Ors. v. Vijay Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed revival of execution proceedings for eviction, holding that executing courts must follow Order XXI Rules 35 and 36 CPC and the Supreme Court's ruling in Shreenath (1998) despite restrictive clauses in settlement deeds.