Delhi High Court
28,224 judgments
International Hospital Limited v. DCIT Circle 12 (2)
The Delhi High Court held that assessment notices issued in the name of amalgamating companies dissolved by operation of law are void and not curable under Section 292B of the Income Tax Act, affirming the Supreme Court's ruling in Maruti Suzuki.
Raj Kumari Taneja v. Rajinder Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act to resolve partnership disputes, holding that questions of settlement are for the arbitrator to decide.
Raj Kumari Taneja v. Rajinder Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act, the Court must appoint an arbitrator if an arbitration agreement exists and the petition is timely, leaving factual disputes such as settlement to the arbitrator.
Pawan Daubey v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that a subsequent licensee must be heard before cancellation of a license affecting their rights, setting aside the High Court order and directing fresh hearing.
Ritu Maheshwari v. Promotional Club
The Supreme Court held that termination of a development scheme extinguishes allotment rights under it, upheld Noida's new scheme allotments, and set aside High Court orders directing consideration under the closed scheme.
Chhavi v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the University of Delhi's restriction limiting the number of papers in the Second Centenary Chance examination, holding that academic policy decisions are within the university's exclusive discretion and not subject to judicial interference absent arbitrariness.
CLN ENERGY PVT. LTD. v. E ASHWA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve disputes arising from a contract containing a valid arbitration clause after the respondent failed to cooperate.
TOMMORROWLAND LIMITED v. SHAKTI AND CO.
The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition under Order XXI CPC based on the judgment debtors' counsel's undertaking to pay the remaining decretal amount within two weeks.
Rathesh Babu Unnikrishnan v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The High Court correctly refused to quash summons under Section 138 NI Act at the pre-trial stage, emphasizing the limited scope of quashing and the applicability of legal presumptions requiring trial to determine the existence of debt.
Rathesh Babu Unnikrishnan v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings under Section 138 NI Act cannot be quashed at the pre-trial stage on mere factual disputes about debt existence, affirming the need for trial to adjudicate such issues.
Angela Rani Bhasin @ Angela Sharma v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement between the parties safeguarding minor children's rights.
Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd v. Dr. Ashish Jain and Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that limitation and other preliminary objections must be decided by the arbitral tribunal, thereby preserving arbitral autonomy.
SPORTA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR. v. DREAMZ11 AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off of the registered mark "Dream11" and restrained use of the confusingly similar mark "dreamz11" and domain name.
Simmi Arora & Anr. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 468, 471, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, directing costs to be paid by the petitioners.
Narender Singh & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under sections 354A/509/34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between parties and the complainant's no-objection, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Ritu Johari v. Vineet Taneja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court suspended visitation rights pending final custody adjudication, emphasizing the child's emotional wellbeing and allowing confidential use of counsellors' reports in legal proceedings.
Vikash Saini & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under sections 498A/406/34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing courts' duty to encourage such settlements.
Jasvinder Singh v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court refused to quash the FIR alleging forgery and fraud in a property dispute, holding that title issues are for civil courts and criminal proceedings should continue.
Amarjit Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related criminal proceedings under Sections 380, 427, and 442 IPC following an amicable settlement and considering the petitioner’s medical condition and bleak prospects of conviction.