Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
SHO, ACB v. Vijay Kataria
The Delhi High Court set aside a Magistrate's order directing FIR registration and investigation for corruption allegations due to lack of prior sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act and failure to consider status reports with reasons.
New Bharat Overseas v. Kian Agro Processing Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining defendants from using the 'TAJ MAHAL' trademark in India or for export, holding that affixation of a registered mark for export constitutes infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Siddharth Rao v. The Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that the Speaker of Delhi Legislative Assembly lacks authority to appoint or promote staff without Lt. Governor's approval and recruitment rules, validating the termination of the petitioner whose appointments were illegal.
Pradeep Ramdanee v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's interim bail application on medical grounds, directing jail authorities to provide adequate treatment and facilitate cataract surgery in custody as per prior judicial orders.
Videocon Industries Limited v. Ram Raj Bhandari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction over company share disputes governed by the Companies Act, 2013, and such matters must be adjudicated by the NCLT, dismissing the civil suit accordingly.
Kanwar Bhan Hans & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the demolition of unauthorized encroachments on Khasra No. 216, holding that petitioners lacked locus standi and that DDA was empowered to act under court directions while protecting religious structures.
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited v. ABB India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding that the appellant could not withhold payments or bank guarantees under the Bhawana contracts towards claims pending adjudication under a separate contract, affirming limited judicial interference with arbitral awards.
Vinay Rathi and Ors. v. Dhananjay Rathi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of an appeal challenging an ex-parte trademark injunction, directing the successor Court to decide pending amendment and interlocutory applications, emphasizing procedural compliance under Order XXXIX Rule 3A CPC.
M/S. ICON SLEEPER TRACK PRIVATE LIMITED v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that the contractually agreed price variation formula including excise duty in base cement cost was correctly applied and not subject to judicial interference.
N.V. Satheesh Madhav and Anr. v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal of a patent application for a bio-bed using non-absorbent cotton due to lack of reasoned analysis on inventive step and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with due process.
Vijay Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Ministry cannot impose new eligibility criteria or delay appointments after UPSC's recommendation and Court's direction, dismissing the Ministry's application to modify the appointment order.
Suraj @ Sonu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony, mobile phone records, ATM withdrawals, and forensic findings.
Dr. Abhishek Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the administrative discretion in posting a General Duty Medical Officer and clarified that grant of Equated Teaching Designation requires prescribed teaching experience and university approval, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for exclusive specialty posting and automatic teaching designation.
Mukesh Jain v. Rajender Prasad Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed elections to proceed subject to restrictions and directed the Trial Court to re-hear the injunction application considering all relevant resolutions.
Karanvir Singh v. Dy. General Manager
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of regularization to a temporary employee who failed to prove valid appointment and application under the employer’s regularization scheme.
Sanjay Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of an employee for unauthorized absence and misconduct, ruling that voluntary retirement under VRS requires formal acceptance and disciplinary proceedings post-application are valid if the employee remains in service.
SH KALE RAM v. SH AJAY & ORS
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by awarding future loss of income despite continued employment, full leave period compensation, and future medical expenses based on permanent disability impact.
Vikram @ Manoj v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for abduction and murder based on consistent circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony, recoveries, and call records, dismissing the appeal.
Dhankalash Distributors Private Limited v. Union of India through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs IBBI to dispose of pending complaints against Resolution Professional within prescribed timelines under Regulation 7 of the 2017 Regulations.
Defsys Solutions Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr
Delhi High Court stayed the Ministry of Defence's suspension of business dealings with Defsys Solutions Pvt. Ltd. pending disclosure of investigation details, protecting ongoing contracts from suspension.