Delhi High Court

60,724 judgments

Year:

Armour Security Pvt. Ltd. v. Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd.

20 Dec 2022 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5772

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to reduce the Local Commissioner's fee from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 3,000 per sitting, emphasizing that fees must be reasonable and recording evidence through a Local Commissioner requires parties' consent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Local Commissioner Section 151 CPC Recording of evidence Reasonable fees

Rushmika Chatterji v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.

20 Dec 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:5832

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a cheque dishonour complaint against a company director, holding that vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires evidence of control or neglect and cannot be decided at the pre-trial stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 vicarious liability director liability

M/S RELX INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 78(1) DELHI & ORS

20 Dec 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:5865-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking refund and stay of tax recovery, directing expeditious disposal of the pending appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

tax petition_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 226(3) stay of demand recovery of tax

JOYVISION ELECTROMEC v. FIRST FEEL INTERNATIONAL; JOYVISION ELECTROMEC v. SALASAR EXIM LTD

20 Dec 2022 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5773

The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a suit dismissed in default due to a mistaken hearing date, emphasizing that parties should not be deprived of remedies on technical grounds and directing the trial court to proceed with the suit after restoration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 9 Rule 4 CPC restoration of suit dismissal in default procedural error

Dr. Asmita Kabra v. Ramjas College & Anr.

20 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5758

The Delhi High Court directed Ramjas College to disburse pension and retiral benefits to Dr. Asmita Kabra with interest for delayed payment following Governing Body approval.

civil petition_allowed pension retiral benefits writ of mandamus interest on delayed payment

Ms Vasudha Srivastava v. Union of India and Anr.

20 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh

The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions against Air India Ltd. are not maintainable post-disinvestment as it ceased to be a public authority amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 disinvestment Air India

Saroj v. Surat Singh

20 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5760

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of an application to reject a plaint on limitation grounds, holding that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law not decidable at the threshold without evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC limitation rejection of plaint mixed question of law and fact

Bharat Seeds Corporation v. ACIT Circle 34(1) New Delhi & Anr

20 Dec 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2023:DHC:120-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices and order for lack of reasoned consideration under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, directing the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh reasoned order after hearing the assessee.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d) Section 148

Amit Goel v. Central Vigilance Commission

20 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5708

The Delhi High Court held that the CVC must independently investigate complaints against its own officers and cannot delegate such complaints back to the same official, upholding the principle of natural justice.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Central Vigilance Commission Chief Vigilance Officer natural justice nemo judex in causa sua

Sushma Singh v. Ram Bhajan Pal

20 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5680
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a written promise to pay a time-barred debt under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act revives the creditor's right to sue, allowing recovery of the full loan amount despite limitation objections.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 25(3) Indian Contract Act Section 18 Limitation Act time barred debt promise to pay

Pradeep Kumar and Anr. v. The Chamber Allotment Committee and Ors.

20 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh

The Delhi High Court directed that chamber allotment seniority lists must include only original applicants from 2009 without disturbing their inter-se seniority, and upheld petitioners' rights against an impugned settlement.

administrative petition_allowed Significant chamber allotment seniority list Karkardooma Court Complex lawyers chambers

Kartika Grover v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:28

The Delhi High Court held that eviction of a daughter-in-law from senior citizen parents' property under the MWPSCA must be balanced with her rights under the Domestic Violence Act, directing eviction with provision of alternate accommodation or maintenance.

family appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 eviction daughter-in-law rights

State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Manoj Kumar @ Meenu & Ors.

20 Dec 2022 · Amit Sharma · 2022:DHC:5684
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal, holding that the trial court's judgment was a possible view based on evidence and not perverse, reaffirming the limited scope of appellate interference in acquittal cases under Section 378 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 378 CrPC appreciation of evidence presumption of innocence

Manjeet Singh Ahlawat v. Union of India and Ors.

20 Dec 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:5727-DB

The Delhi High Court directed constitution of a specialist medical board to reassess the petitioner's fitness for recruitment, making its report final and binding.

administrative petition_allowed medical examination specialist medical board fitness for recruitment constable GD

Arun Kumar Gupta v. Union of India

20 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5709
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that in pending criminal cases, passport renewal without a specific court order is limited to one year, and a ten-year renewal requires explicit trial court permission.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant passport renewal Passport Rules, 1980 Passport Act, 1967 notification dated 25.08.1993

Welspun One Logistics Parks Fund I v. Mohit Verma & Ors.

19 Dec 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:5687
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration agreement in a 'Non-Binding Term Sheet' is severable and enforceable, directing appointment of an arbitrator while leaving issues of enforceability and legality to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Non-Binding Term Sheet Section 11 Arbitration Act Separability Doctrine

Vedanta Ltd. v. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-26(1), New Delhi

19 Dec 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2023:DHC:88-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act against Vedanta Ltd. for lack of valid grounds and proper application of mind, relying on prior judicial and tribunal findings.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act reassessment notice one-time settlement Debt Recovery Tribunal

Anil Yadav v. State & Anr.

19 Dec 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:5658
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Sessions Court had jurisdiction to try an Army personnel accused of rape, as he failed to prove active service in a notified area, and non-compliance with procedural rules did not vitiate the trial when military authorities were aware and did not opt for court-martial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Army Act 1950 Section 70 Army Act court-martial jurisdiction active service

Ajay Tyagi v. B9 Beverages

19 Dec 2022 · Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:5718

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of interim compensation under Section 143A NI Act, emphasizing the need for reasoned discretionary orders based on the accused's dilatory conduct.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 143A Negotiable Instruments Act interim compensation dishonoured cheque dilatory tactics

Delhi Pollution Control Committee v. Raj Kumar Gupta

19 Dec 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:5660

The Delhi High Court held that an appellate court cannot uphold conviction and simultaneously remand the case solely for reconsideration of sentence, setting aside such remand and directing the appellate court to decide sentence in accordance with law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 386 Cr.P.C. Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 Effluent Treatment Plant Environmental pollution