Inderjeet Singh v. Seema Khattar

Delhi High Court · 21 Dec 2022 · 2022:DHC:5779
Tushar Rao Gedela
CM(M) 1412/2022
2022:DHC:5779
civil appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that procedural applications under Order XI CPC and Section 151 CPC are maintainable in eviction petitions under the Delhi Rent Control Act and must be taken on record and decided on merits.

Full Text
Translation output
Neutral Citation Number 2022/DHC/005779
CM(M) 1412/2022 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 21.12.2022
CM(M) 1412/2022
INDERJEET SINGH ..... Petitioner
versus
SEEMA KHATTAR ..... Respondent For the Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Suri and Ms. Komal Chhibber, Advocates.
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Respondent : None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
JUDGMENT
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)
[ The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode ]

1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 54392/2022 (for exemption)

2. The application is disposed of.

3. Mr. Praveen Suri, learned counsel appears for the petitioner and submits that the learned Additional Rent Controller (‘ARC’) has refused to take the application under Order XI Rules 1, 2, 12, 13 and 14 r/w Section 151 of the CPC, 1908, on record on the basis that the aforesaid application is not maintainable in the eviction petitions, filed under Section 14 (1) e r/w Section 25 B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1957. CM(M) 1412/2022 & CM APPL. 54393/2022 (for stay)

4. Learned counsel submits that on that basis, the ARC refused to even take the application on record. Neutral Citation Number 2022/DHC/005779 CM(M) 1412/2022 2

5. By way of the present petition, all that the petitioner seeks is that the application under Order 11 of the CPC, 1908, be taken on record and decided in accordance with law.

6. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Court is of the considered opinion that in such matters, where the Trial Court has not even taken on record the application and decided the same in accordance with law, no useful purpose would be served in issuing notice to the respondent for the reason that it will entail delay in disposal of the eviction petition pending before the ARC.

7. The right of a litigant to file and maintain an application is indelible unless barred by law and this Court is of the opinion that the rights of a litigant to agitate their particular issue cannot be diluted, subject however, to the limitations under any law as well as the power conferred upon the courts to decide the same.

8. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the ARC to take on record the application under Order XI Rules 1, 2, 12, 13 & 14, CPC, 1908 and decide the same in accordance with law.

9. It is informed that the eviction petition is listed on 04.01.2023.

10. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter and the ARC is at liberty to deal with the application on its own merits.

11. The petition along with pending application stands disposed of in the above terms.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J DECEMBER 21, 2022