Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Laxmi Devi & Ors. v. Rashid & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the insurance company is liable to pay compensation awarded under the Employees’ Compensation Act when the vehicle was insured at the time of the accident, setting aside the order directing the employer to pay first.
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Joint Venture of M/s Sai Rama Engineering Enterprises & M/s Megha Engineering & Infrastructure Limited
The Delhi High Court held that procedural defects in filing an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act do not render it non est, allowed condonation of delay within the 30-day grace period, and remanded the matter for consideration on merits.
Noor Alam v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his retirement order within eight weeks and communicate the decision in writing.
Mahendra Kumar Verma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a government employee is entitled to full reimbursement of bona fide medical expenses incurred at government-recognized hospitals, even if charges exceed approved rates, and the government must recover any excess from the hospital, not the employee.
SanDisk LLC & Anr. v. Laxmi Mobiles & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against defendants for unauthorized sale of counterfeit products infringing SanDisk's registered trademarks and copyrights.
M/S GKA IMPEX PVT LTD v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Banking Ombudsman's order, holding that the bank was not liable for a mistaken RTGS transaction caused by the remitter's error and that writ jurisdiction is not appropriate for disputed factual issues where alternate remedies exist.
V-Guard Industries Ltd v. Rakesh Malhotra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that suits involving substantially the same trademark issues pending appeal in another court must be stayed under Section 10 CPC to prevent conflicting judgments.
KLEENOIL FILTRATION INDIA PVT LTD v. UDIT KHATRI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiff's suit for trademark infringement and passing off against defendants who failed to contest, granting permanent injunctions restraining use of the marks "KLEENOIL" and "CLEANOIL" and dealing in counterfeit products.
Dhanesh Gupta and Ors. v. Reserve Bank of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act possession proceedings are not maintainable where an efficacious remedy under Section 17 exists before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
Tushar Jarwal and Anr. v. State Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that disputed factual and contractual issues regarding loan interest and tenure cannot be adjudicated under writ jurisdiction and must be resolved through civil proceedings.
CEPCO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. TEWARI RESTAURANT PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that non-compliance with procedural requirements under the Commercial Courts Act is curable and a suit wrongly filed as non-commercial can be re-numbered and proceeded with as a commercial suit without rejection.
Shri Ramsujan Patel & Ors. v. Shri Dayanand Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the MACT's order on territorial jurisdiction and condoned delay to allow the petitioners' motor accident claim to be adjudicated on merits.
Dabur India Limited v. The Advertising Standards Council of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of interim injunction against ASCI's communication, holding that health-related advertisement claims must be scientifically substantiated and self-regulatory bodies have recognized authority to enforce advertising codes.
Sukruti Dugal v. Jahnavi Dugal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to vacate the interim status quo order in a partition suit involving alleged HUF properties, holding that factual disputes including the validity of a prior settlement decree require trial and cannot be decided at the interim stage.
Sh. Subhash Arora v. M/S Dimension Architecture (P) Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an auction purchaser under the SARFAESI Act is neither a necessary nor proper party to a suit for specific performance and dismissed the application for impleadment.
M/S SHIVSHAKTI ENTERPRISES Engineer & Contractor v. M/S TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of an 85-day delay in refiling a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, emphasizing the Court's discretion to condone delay in refiling when the initial filing was within limitation and the delay was reasonably explained.
V-Guard Industries Ltd v. Rakesh Malhotra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that suits involving the same parties and substantially the same subject matter pending in another court must be stayed under Section 10 CPC to avoid conflicting judgments and multiplicity of proceedings.
Namita Gupta v. Suraj Holdings Limited
The Delhi High Court held that Section 24 CPC applies to suits relating to commercial disputes and that only the High Court can transfer such suits to Commercial Courts, setting aside unauthorized transfers by lower courts and directing transfer under Section 24 CPC to preserve proceedings.
Novartis AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the interlocutory injunction restraining Natco Pharma from exploiting Novartis's patent on Ceritinib, rejecting the defendant's plea to vacate the injunction based on non-disclosure of a refused Divisional Application.
Bijender@Vishnu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life-convict to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, affirming the right of a convict to pursue legal remedies through counsel of choice under the Delhi Prisons Rules.