Delhi High Court
60,983 judgments
Tej Singh v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court quashed disciplinary penalty and recovery imposed on an FCI employee for storage losses, holding that procedural lapses and lack of evidence of his liability warranted setting aside the orders.
Ved Prakash @ Mistri v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an undertrial accused in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity after five years of custody, applying Supreme Court guidelines with conditions to ensure trial attendance.
Parsu Ram v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted parole to a convict to enable him to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, affirming the right to engage counsel of choice despite availability of free legal aid in jail.
Laxmi Kant Sharma & Anr. v. Kela Devi @ Kailashi Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' civil revision petition seeking to set aside an ex parte decree, holding that their negligence and lack of sufficient cause did not justify interference under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
Nishant Khatri v. Bar Council of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that advocates cannot be debarred for failing to clear the AIBE within two years due to non-conduct of the exam and upheld the Bar Council of India's exemption of the affected period.
Virendra Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 92(i) of the Air Force Act, 1950 and Air Force Order 03/2013, dismissing the petition challenging a maintenance order granted to the petitioner’s wife and child.
Parvez Alam v. State of Delhi (NCT) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 279 and 337 IPC following a voluntary settlement between the parties in a motor vehicle accident case, emphasizing the court's power to quash proceedings in private disputes where continuation serves no useful purpose.
Gaurav Baisoya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent specialist board for a Coast Guard recruitment candidate due to contradictory medical reports, making the board's decision final and binding.
M/S V-GUARD INDUSTRIES LTD. v. M/S LIVGUARD ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD AND ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that a brief delay in submitting opposition evidence due to technical issues does not amount to abandonment under the Trade Marks Rules.
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited v. Solitaire Automotive & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a loan and guarantee agreement involving Tata Capital and Solitaire Automotive.
Darshan Investment Pvt Ltd v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the maintainability of an appeal under the Delhi Land Reforms Act challenging ejectment proceedings involving urbanization issues is to be decided by the appellate authority, and the High Court will not entertain a writ petition on this ground if an efficacious remedy exists.
Vikram Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed a petitioner in judicial custody for murder limited supervised visits outside jail to complete urgent pension formalities but declined interim bail for an extended period.
Ritu Sethi v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition challenging acquittal under Section 498A IPC, affirming that appellate interference in acquittal is warranted only if the judgment is perverse or based on incorrect appreciation of evidence.
Gaurav Paliwal v. Central Warehousing Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of candidature for failure to produce a mandatory No Objection Certificate and concealment of employment during recruitment.
Raman Kwatra & Anr. v. M/S. KEI Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim injunction restraining the appellant's use of the trademark 'KEI', holding that the respondent's registered marks do not cover the appellant's goods and remanded the matter for consideration under Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act.
Govind Singh v. M/s Satya Group Pvt Ltd and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award on the ground that the arbitrator was unilaterally appointed and ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing that waiver of such ineligibility requires express written agreement.
General Manager Northern Railway v. Pioneer Publicity Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding the railway liable to provide the entire contracted advertising area or refund proportionate fees, dismissing the appellant's challenge for patent illegality.
Amit Brothers v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination and forfeiture of performance guarantee for non-commencement of contractual work, upholding the employer's right to terminate and recover dues under the contract.
Raj Kumar Gupta v. M/s Narang Constructions & Financiers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that procedural defects in the initial filing of a Section 34 petition do not render it non-est for limitation purposes and condoned a 52-day delay in re-filing to cure such defects.
Suraj Bhan Arya v. Kishan Singh Arya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an oral partition of ancestral property effected in 1995 was valid and final, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for partition filed in 2012 as barred on merits though not by limitation.