Noor Alam v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 09 Jan 2023 · 2023:DHC:169-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna
W.P.(C) 192/2023
2023:DHC:169-DB
administrative other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his retirement order within eight weeks and communicate the decision in writing.

Full Text
Translation output
Neutral Citation Number: 2023/DHC/000169
W.P.(C) 192/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 09.01.2023
W.P.(C) 192/2023
NOOR ALAM ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Abhay Kumar Bhargava & Mr.Satyaarth B. Sinha, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms.Aishwarya (GP) & Mr.Devvrat
Yadav, Advs. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Sh.Paramveer Singh, AC (LAW)
BSF.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to adjudicate the representation dated 20.11.2022 preferred by the petitioner against his retirement order dated 20.12.2021 passed by the Commandant of 124 BN BSF under Rule 26 of the BSF Rules, 1969 in a time bound manner.

2. In view of the prayer sought, we hereby dispose of the present petition by giving direction to the respondents to adjudicate the representation dated 17:21 Neutral Citation Number: 2023/DHC/000169 W.P.(C) 192/2023 20.11.2022 within eight weeks from today as per law and the decision taken thereon shall be communicated to the petitioner in writing within one week thereafter.

3. Needless to say that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

4. In view of aforesaid directions, petition is disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA)

JUDGE JANUARY 09, 2023 17:21