Delhi High Court
60,983 judgments
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks
The Delhi High Court directed the CGPDTM to enhance hearing capacity and regularly report on pendency to ensure timely disposal of trademark opposition matters.
Gurvinder Pal Singh v. Ravinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s limited cross-examination of the respondent under Section 311 Cr.P.C. on fresh income affidavit material to ensure a just decision in a maintenance proceeding.
Sunil v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to denial of effective legal aid and failure to prove essential ingredients of dacoity, emphasizing the constitutional right to fair trial and legal representation.
Union of India and Anr. v. M/S Indian Agro Marketing Co-operative Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award holding that invocation of a bank guarantee without proof of loss and without prior notice was illegal, affirming limited scope for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Manak Shoe Company Pvt. Ltd. v. HCL Comnet Systems and Services Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a judgment debtor cannot unilaterally adjust a security deposit against an Arbitral Award without adjudication or admission, dismissing applications seeking to record such adjustment as certified under Order XXI Rule 2 CPC.
KLEENOIL FILTRATION INDIA PVT LTD v. UDIT KHATRI & ORS.
The court held that a suit cannot be decreed straightaway under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC solely due to non-filing of written statement without the court first being satisfied that no disputed factual issues require proof.
Ravi @ Anil Chaudhary v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged with murder and conspiracy, holding that prima facie evidence did not implicate him directly and that bail is the rule, not the exception.
Jumah Khan v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an undertrial accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case after prolonged custody exceeding half the minimum sentence, applying constitutional principles overriding statutory bail restrictions.
Suresh Puri v. State Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the bank's disciplinary penalties and appropriation of the petitioner's terminal benefits without due process were unlawful, directing release of withheld salary and reversal of unauthorized deductions.
Saad Ahmed Siddiqui & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that the period between conviction and sentencing must be reasonable, directed expeditious compliance with procedural timelines for victim compensation, and emphasized balancing accused's rights with victims' interests.
Koshar Ali v. State of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused involved in a conspiracy to cheat by multiple sales of the same property, as custodial interrogation was necessary for investigation.
Neeraj Bhatt v. The State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a POCSO convict to file a Special Leave Petition, holding that the right to access legal remedies constitutes special circumstances warranting parole despite adverse jail conduct.
Hoti Lal v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant under Section 308 IPC due to insufficient and contradictory prosecution evidence, emphasizing the need for corroboration beyond sole testimony.
State v. Mohd. Naved @ Pilla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's application to cancel bail granted to the accused, holding that subsequent independent offences do not justify bail cancellation absent impact on the fair trial or violation of bail conditions.
Satya Dev Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending representation on seniority within a stipulated time, without quashing the gradation list or altering seniority at this stage.
Kamlesh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellant for raping a 2-year-old minor, affirmed the reliability of medical and testimonial evidence despite delay and contradictions, and granted set-off benefits under Section 428 Cr.P.C. for life imprisonment.
Shabbir Malik v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that minor contradictions in witness statements do not justify discharge at the charge framing stage under Section 239 Cr.P.C. and restored the charge of criminal intimidation under Section 506 IPC against the accused.
AIWA Co. Ltd. v. AIVVA Enterprises Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court confirmed an interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'AIVVA', holding that use without written consent from the registered proprietor amounts to trademark infringement and passing off.
M/S GRAND AUTO CAPITAL AND ORS v. M/S JINDAL DYECHEM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an ex-parte eviction decree, upholding modification of mesne profits and emphasizing expeditious resolution under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
MS Rangoli Resorts Private Limited & Anr. v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious completion of land demarcation and permitted temporary boundary wall construction post-deadline, clarifying such construction does not confer rights if land is forest land.